- Joined
- May 27, 2013
- Messages
- 111
Is it ethical and legitimate to provide instruction on developing a skill, achieving something, or creating a lifestyle that you do not live or have not lived yourself? There are many people in the pick up community who teach how to consistently take home 10s, how to have multiple girlfriends at once, how to live a lifestyle like Dan Bilzerian. And this goes for girlschase and many more sites. But are their lessons legitimate if they have not done the things they are teaching themselves?
It goes back to the economist vs the hedge fund manager kind of discussion. One teaches it and one actually does it. But how valid can the professor's advice be if he is not accomplished in the field of investing himself? I believe this could be even more important when grading the validity of the advice from teachers of seduction since it is farther from an actual science.
One could assume that if you're able to master all the material on the girlschase website you would have multiple 10s in rotation as well as the ability to seduce high level people and celebrities. And if you agree that teachers should have accomplished what they are teaching you to accomplish, then all writers on Girlschase should have access to beautiful women at their beck and call all the time and also have a ridiculous level of social influence through all these girls' instagram followers and other platforms.
Do you think this is how it is for the GC writers, and do you think our teachers here and on other seduction sites should have their teachings mastered themselves? And also, if the writers would like to tune in here, is this the life you all are living?
I mean no disrespect to those running Girlchase. I am just curious as to how much of what is being taught is theory/conjecture/observatinos of other successful seducers versus lessons you have learned from your own experience mastering what you teach.
It goes back to the economist vs the hedge fund manager kind of discussion. One teaches it and one actually does it. But how valid can the professor's advice be if he is not accomplished in the field of investing himself? I believe this could be even more important when grading the validity of the advice from teachers of seduction since it is farther from an actual science.
One could assume that if you're able to master all the material on the girlschase website you would have multiple 10s in rotation as well as the ability to seduce high level people and celebrities. And if you agree that teachers should have accomplished what they are teaching you to accomplish, then all writers on Girlschase should have access to beautiful women at their beck and call all the time and also have a ridiculous level of social influence through all these girls' instagram followers and other platforms.
Do you think this is how it is for the GC writers, and do you think our teachers here and on other seduction sites should have their teachings mastered themselves? And also, if the writers would like to tune in here, is this the life you all are living?
I mean no disrespect to those running Girlchase. I am just curious as to how much of what is being taught is theory/conjecture/observatinos of other successful seducers versus lessons you have learned from your own experience mastering what you teach.
