LR Easy Lay

[justonemoreperson]

Haven't posted an lr in a while, still was meeting and fucking girls but didn't see a point in posting.

Met this bitch on bumble, text game getting pretty good, she was very excited. Sending me lip biting gifs, heart emojis, etc. Just getting better at spiking excitement consistently and setting the right vibe.

We met for ice cream, got to know her a bit, used a teevster sexual gambit for the first time, the "seducing men vs women" one.

After saying the last line of the gambit, she thought about it a bit and went "oh yeah, that's true. where would you touch me instead though?"

So I said, "well, id work my way up, first id touch your hand(then i grabbed her hand and held it)... then, Id put my hand on your thigh(so i put my hand low on her thigh)... and then, I'll show you rest later"

It was early in the interaction so I didn't want to put my hand near her pussy yet but she was receptive.

After about 20 minutes I told her let's go walk in the park, she was excited about that.

We get to the park, she's looking around and asked me if there are bushes... I cheekily asked her why was she looking for bushes?... She smiles and says "you know why"

I tell her we don't need bushes, I'll take you to meet my cat. She agrees. I go to my place, within 5 minutes she is nude, I am nude. We bang for 2 rounds. I suggest we go grab wine and then round 3, she is down so we do that.

Then she says she's hungry, I tell her about a nice spot nearby, ask her if she's gonna treat me. She does, and we eat wings, pizza, fries, she's not penny pinching.

She still a bit buzzed from the wine when we finish so we go back to the park cus I told her she shouldn't drive yet. She told me she was daydreaming about me fucking her in the park earlier.

So i parked my car at the park made us go to back seat, she gave me head, then I fucked her one more time. Took her back to her car and I left.

 

[Skills]

Try to put links to the gambit and text screen shots otherwise the lrs are useless.. when people read lrs the goal is to learn what you did so others can replicate..

 

[James Cruse]

After saying the last line of the gambit, she thought about it a bit and went "oh yeah, that's true. where would you touch me instead though?"

So I said, "well, id work my way up, first id touch your hand(then i grabbed her hand and held it)... then, Id put my hand on your thigh(so i put my hand low on her thigh)... and then, I'll show you rest later"

The touching and physical escalation would have been the reason this got sexual like it did, not the sex talk.
Touching does the heavy lifting in arousing women, not the small amount of talk.

I think men (even on this forum) project too much about what they themselves like. I don't need to be touched by women, it's not that arousing to me.
But women being touched by men is highly arousing, far more than almost anything else we can do with women.

Men simply don't touch women enough, in my experience of seduction (especially in daygame).

 

[justonemoreperson]

The touching and physical escalation would have been the reason this got sexual like it did, not the sex talk.
Touching does the heavy lifting in arousing women, not the small amount of talk.

I understand that, I have only ever used non-verbal tools like touch, eye contact, and proximity to make women horny before this date and I have a very high first date lay ratio. I want to start implementing strategic sex talk into my tool box and see how it improves my game...

Also, starting to grow bored with my typical routine so I'm excited to have new things to test.

 

[James Cruse]

I understand that, I have only ever used non-verbal tools like touch, eye contact, and proximity to make women horny before this date and I have a very high first date lay ratio. I want to start implementing strategic sex talk into my tool box and see how it improves my game...

I understand, it's experimentation to see what's effective and how effective - everyone should be doing that and I've done alot of it myself (and continue to).

Take this perspective though:
it's better to use seduction techniques that lead to low (or no) resistance from her of the touching/physical escalation, rather than using verbals to sexually arouse women directly (as you were aiming to do).

So it sounds like a more indirect way of arousing a woman, but it's far more effective, reliable and ultimately faster in getting a woman aroused and moving towards sex soon.

Directly sexually arousing women with spoken words is very ineffective or very inconsistent, at best, from my experience.

 

[Jan]

it's better to use seduction techniques that lead to low (or no) resistance from her of the touching/physical escalation, rather than using verbals to sexually arouse women directly (as you were aiming to do).

Thanks for pointing this out. I have had exactly the same experience. I only saw chicks aroused from touch/proximity, never from verbals. I tried different gambits several times and since I assumed they were supposed to arouse her, I always concluded they didn't work. But if you think about verbals as the tool to remove resistance to touch, it's a different perspective all together.

 

[Jan]

We get to the park, she's looking around and asked me if there are bushes... I cheekily asked her why was she looking for bushes?... She smiles and says "you know why"

Dude, you took her fantasy away from her. You were lucky she was that horny. There are chicks out there who would let you fuck them in public/kinky/risky spots but refuse to go home with you. More arousing for them I guess.

 

[KnownUniverse]

Thanks for pointing this out. I have had exactly the same experience. I only saw chicks aroused from touch/proximity, never from verbals. I tried different gambits several times and since I assumed they were supposed to arouse her, I always concluded they didn't work. But if you think about verbals as the tool to remove resistance to touch, it's a different perspective all together.

you've never aroused a girl over text?

 

[Jan]

you've never aroused a girl over text?

actually, now once you mentioned this... I did

I remember when I described almost the full scenario what would I do to her, they indeed got aroused
but I don't recall anything similar in real life convo

 

[justonemoreperson]

Dude, you took her fantasy away from her. You were lucky she was that horny. There are chicks out there who would let you fuck them in public/kinky/risky spots but refuse to go home with you. More arousing for them I guess.

we fucked in the park the next day

 

[James Cruse]

Thanks for pointing this out. I have had exactly the same experience. I only saw chicks aroused from touch/proximity, never from verbals. I tried different gambits several times and since I assumed they were supposed to arouse her, I always concluded they didn't work. But if you think about verbals as the tool to remove resistance to touch, it's a different perspective all together.

Too many guys on here mistakenly believe words sexually arouse women and I can see why they (mistakenly) believe that.
Even Ross Jeffries promotes this idea, much to his detriment, which is perhaps where some of the users here got the idea that 'Words = (Female) Sexual Arousal".

I think people also got the idea from the Grandmaster Method - and mistakenly took away that he was saying sexual words to arouse them, when it was the relentless physical touching that did all the seduction heavy lifting for him, not his sexual jokes.
Grandmaster used sexual jokes to be different and challenge women, not for truly increasing their arousal. The jokes LED to touching (which led to arousal), not the words leading to arousal directly.

Using verbals as a 'Stepping Stone' to remove resistance to touch - touch is far more effective in arousing women than using words ever could or would arouse a woman, at any time.

 

[Skills]

Jesus christ! for all the missinformation

Grandmaster style:

sex talk

 

[justonemoreperson]

this girl got upset yesterday that apparently all my convos with her are about sex... I ignored her texts

Today we texted, she said she was stressed and asked if we could call, then also asked if we could meet this friday. I agree to meet and we call her, she point blank asks me "Do you only see me as pussy?" I just tell her "No, I dont." "I wanna hang out more with u"

She says she wants to hang out more with me too, do "other things"(suuure) and that she wanted to talk more about it on friday. I already know how the conversation will go, she's gonna question me on how I see her and what she means to me. Really easy stuff to deal with. Then after that, I'm gonna clap her cheeks and make her cum hard for me.

This chick is cute and she provides for me, buys me things. Only been with 3 guys, cute personality, cute body and I like the scent of her pussy. So I'm open to making her my girlfriend

 

[Francis]

open to making her my girlfriend

Monogamous?

What's the long term goal, as in years away?

She’ll Do What She Has to to Get What She Wants

Girls: pretty darn good at getting what they want from men. Apologies if this is a little rough-written. I haven’t slept in 36 hours (save a pair of 30-minute cat naps) and just spent 24 of those hours in a hospital emergency ward (not for myself; the injured party’s going to be fine we think)...

www.girlschase.com

Don't get me wrong... A lot is possible with enough sex-game value differential in the marketplace. Here's texts from this morning and afternoon. I haven't texted her in a month except to congratulate her getting an A in her class.

Master I want your cock in such a terrible way. I can hardly think about anything else. Please come fuck me before I go cross-eyed from horniness.
Please come fuck me soon Master. I think I've been such a good girl and deserve a reward. And I just want that cock of yours that I like so much deep inside me

Another article to check out:

The 2 Year Drop

Ever notice how fairytales and about ninety-nine out of a hundred romance tales you see or read are about how two people first got together? Cinderella meets her prince, against all odds, and he manages to find her again after he's lost her, against all odds, and the two of them ride off...

www.girlschase.com

But before "where do you see this going" even months from now, do you want to bring her outside eventually? I've found things can stretch out with lover dates. An example is going to the grocery store for ingredients, getting mini hot food at the back, and feeding her in line.

Here she's cooking again and I'm taking her out for a jaunt to lay around by the water. She texts "Good evening Francis" and said "Whatever time you're thinking works for me. As I know you have laid many good plans thus far" [note "laid" was innuendo in response to mine].

The point is you can show her you appreciate her as a person through continuing to deep dive on romantic dates. And the cheaper they are, the more romantic they can be. Chase recently posted stargazing on X.

I've got to ask though, do you enjoy her company and think she is an awesome girl?

 

[Francis]

Can't edit, but romantic dates are essentially outdoor sex. Otherwise you can take her to scout venues.

 

[justonemoreperson]

What's the long term goal, as in years away?

Usually with a girlfriend, my goal is to turn her into a live in caretaker. She needs to cook for me, clean for me, buy things for me, is pleasant to be around, lets me fuck her and give me head whenever I want, and doesn't bring me drama. I would still probably mess around with women on the side, especially if she's not living with me.

But before "where do you see this going" even months from now, do you want to bring her outside eventually? I've found things can stretch out with lover dates.

Yea she pays for dates so I don't mind going out with her and I enjoy her personality

The point is you can show her you appreciate her as a person through continuing to deep dive on romantic dates. And the cheaper they are, the more romantic they can be. Chase recently posted stargazing on X.

She has fantasies of getting fucked in the woods. I told her I would smash her brains out under the moonlight... I'll probably take her to explore the woods with me. I know those romantic dates can turn into sex very easily... She don't need much... Just something different than going to my house and getting railed

 

[Francis]

Usually with a girlfriend, my goal is to turn her into a live in caretaker. She needs to cook for me, clean for me, buy things for me, is pleasant to be around, lets me fuck her and give me head whenever I want, and doesn't bring me drama. I would still probably mess around with women on the side, especially if she's not living with me.



Yea she pays for dates so I don't mind going out with her and I enjoy her personality



She has fantasies of getting fucked in the woods. I told her I would smash her brains out under the moonlight... I'll probably take her to explore the woods with me. I know those romantic dates can turn into sex very easily... She don't need much... Just something different than going to my house and getting railed

Ok I would recommend getting that sterility suspicion confirmed by a urologist and make sure she knows... I meant like the five year plan at least.

So if she continues to be awesome, would you stay with her as a main indefinitely unless it blows up for some reason? Are you planning to online date for side chicks or is the plan to be going out like skills and have her know?

It seems a little early in your seduction career to focus most time on one woman and not continue to push the skill set. Can I ask how old you are generally?

I'm curious how this goes without kids in the picture... I can't imagine living with someone. If I had a family I'd need a separate bedroom.