Going progressive with girls.

[ThePhoenix]

Not really, I'm still trying to learn from other people too.

This is good, but your approach to how best to learn from them is deeply flawed.

The fact that people are uncertain about if I have results is itself a clue to me.

If I understand you correctly, you are inferring from Fog and myself having asked you if you're getting results, that the two of us actually don't have any idea whether or not your proposed paradigm works.

This leads me to wonder if you've got an atypical neurology, some kind of ASD perhaps. The reason I say this is because for most people it would be readily apparent that Fog and I were asking you not because we're unsure of your results, but because we fully expect you're not getting results and wanted to draw your attention to that fact. The questions were rhetorical.

Getting anywhere with women requires dealing with a lot of social subtleties that can be hard enough even for a neurotypical person to master; if you have an ASD, I hate to say but it could be very uphill. I can't really help you much there, but maybe there are others on the forum who could help more if you post a question specifically about this.

In any case. You can't really draw meaningful conclusions from what other people do or don't know about utterly random methods of dealing with women.

And that's why I ask others the same questions on if the same methods work.

Ok, but rather than asking "does A work?"... "does B work?"... "does C work?"... is it not more efficient to just ask "what does work?" You save a lot of time!

If you ask an electronics teacher, "can I make an amplifier using only resistors?" It's basically an annoying and largely useless question, the answer of which is "no". It would take you a loooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong time to randomly guess the right question to ask in that fashion. Why don't you ask, "how do I make an amplifier?" This is a more efficient question!

But I specialize in things about women that most other guys don't.

The problem you're going to find here is that you may end up spending a lot of energy on specializations that don't actually get the end result you want. So, it makes more sense to, rather than look at some lifeless dusty corner of the room with a magnifying glass, to start by looking at the whole room and looking at where the action is. The guys who know what they're doing with women can show you the parts of the room that are most worth looking at.

For example, if you sit at the cafeteria by yourself, will women want sit in the same table as you?

This is actually not a bad question. But don't think nobody already knows this. If you post a question asking, "how can I maximize my chances of girls sitting at my table", you would probably get some pretty good advice. For starters, you need to work on "fundamentals" like style of dress, physique, posture, eye contact and body language. By working on those things you can increase the chances girls will become interested enough to want to position themselves near you.

Mind you, I would not put TOO much emphasis at this point on getting girls to position themselves near you. If you develop a strong enough sexy vibe they will do it more often, but it is still far more efficient to also approach them.

Either way, once you are "in set" with a girl - and this applies even in the very rare cases she approaches you, - you will need to take charge and move the interaction towards a date and sex. She expects you to be a man and do this. If you fail to do this, her interest in you will fade.