Practical examples of using descriptive, emotional language to arouse

[Francis]

Other thread was KJ karma it seems...

Expecting this one to stay empty cause barely anyone even posts field reports.

***

Francis on forum hiatus

I'll be back...

...with lady killing, flowery language.

 

[James Cruse]

Have you actually started using the language on any women yet or finished reading the book?

If so, write your experiences down here.

 

[Kshatrap A.V.]

Can poems be an example of this?

Men since history became poets to woo women.

 

[Glow]

Example From an old lay report:

"We spoke of Guilty Pleasures(a topic i often nudge the convo into) - mine is warm baths and indulging in these which i describe in detail, you know when ypu slide down naked into the warm waters, letting it fully cover every part of you body, how you feel as the warmth encompass youre entire being and how you just indulge.. fully.. letting the warmth sweep everything away allowing you to surrender into it.. that voice in your head saying THIS IS for you... and you just feel... GREAT.."

Could be i ask her if she has any guilty pleasures along a convo - often girls will mirror the question back to me where i am prepared - i can shoot things like above riff style(a flow you can use smartly). or i just lead it myself. But ntoice the leading into a GOOD Seduction-related topic via questioning.

FYI This is a SOT+ - a seduction oriented topic that is a good transfer between regular talk and feely states this one more adjacent to the sexual side of feelings. Aka not the first i do mostly. But just an example.

When a woman listens to something like this - She will have to feel to understand it. Means she will slide away from judging you/being more intellectual into a more feely state. + She will understand that you understand the feel side of things making you more interesting as you get that side important for women. Not all men do. Takes a few more to fully get her to see this but you get the idea. And she will feel a very strong feeling getting her in a nice state, something that happens to her when around you.

btw - i would prob shortn it today and you have a lot stronger verbal people in here like teevster - i would recommend to look through his articles and posts for stronger stuff. His Gambit collection is literally what youre asking for at a very high level and he explains it detailed in breakdown articles.

 

[Warped Mindless]

Not the “sexual key nlp method” you are referring to OP but something related to (as in the language is emotional, descriptive, and designed to arouse) it I’ve been using a lot, in person and over text, is telling women I’m writing a fiction book. That’s the bait.

If you timed if right and the girl is at least someone interested she will ask about it.

This is where you tell her that it’s “to dirty for her” and tease her about sticking to PG-13 things due to “inability to handle it.”

Tease her about it and then make her jump thru hoops before you show her anything.

Then I show her a less sexual passage I wrote that leads up to a sexual encounter between two characters. I take it away righr when it gets good.

Should note; this passage is short. Women don’t really want to read a while book!

This always leads to them wanting to read the sexual scene that happens next.

Again tease her.

Then I hand her my phone (or text it to her) and let her read the 6 paragraph extremely graphic, detailed, and emotional sex scene where the male uses expert foreplay on the female character.

This is also a form of sexual prizing because any woman who reads it will instantly understand that I have to be good in bed to be able to write it.

They often want to read the rest of the scene. I tel them “it’s not written yet. I’m still looking for…. Inspiration….” Then shut up and look DEEP into her eyes and eye fuck her.

Works better in person for that reason. Still works over text too.

Can go so many places after that and women get very aroused from it.

 

[Francis]

@Glow that is a perfect example. I will re-review Teevster's stuff. I went through his sticky before with a mental filter for non-explicit gambits, mostly for covert day game or dates without ideal isolation. So I may have skipped too quickly over some of the descriptive language if it was categorized as bold.

@Warped Mindless that is extremely clever. There's so much good stuff packed into that, also "instant value demonstration"... I think Karea and Vision use that term IVD, like a DHV "display". Incredibly efficient, law of least effort as well. Almost like if a girl put on porn lol

 

[James Cruse]

Can poems be an example of this?

Men since history became poets to woo women.

I think the issue with alot of poems, that aren't as appealing to women, is they don't contain any direct emotional content.

The passage written above by Glow is the same - very little emotional content but a good amount of sensory content.

Ideally aim for both Emotional and sensory content, or if you had to pick one or the other, it would be more directly emotional content (as per the SK book).

That's gotten me better results with women so far, whereas focusing fully or mostly on sensory aspects isn't as effective.

Most men choose to emphasize sensory content predominantly because that's alot easier for men to remember and use more naturally, with less thought.
Whereas alot of men find emotional content more unwieldly for them to use and remember (because men are naturally more logical and so are their memories).

 

[Kshatrap A.V.]

I think the issue with alot of poems, that aren't as appealing to women, is they don't contain any direct emotional content.

The passage written above by Glow is the same - very little emotional content but a good amount of sensory content.

Ideally you won't both Emotional and sensory content, or if you had to pick one or the other, it would be more directly emotional content (as per the SK book).

That's gotten me better results with women so far, whereas focusing fully or mostly on sensory aspects isn't as effective.

Most men choose to emphasize sensory content predominantly because that's alot easier for men to remember and use more naturally, with less thought.
Whereas alot of men find emotional content more unwieldly for them to use and remember (because men are naturally more logical and so are their memories).

Need more on emotional vs sensory content in verbals.

 

[Francis]

Here's Franco's example from the other thread.

I used bold text for what seems to be emotions, and underline for sensory words.

So it seems to be a good example of light on the tangible and heavy on the emotional. I still need to read the book in depth. Very interesting distinction.

Women are hedonists of the emotions. This is a banal example, but imagine if you
were to answer in the following way to a male friend, when he asks what kind of work
you do:

“This is a very exciting and interesting question. Your question shakes me so
deeply. Yes! My job! Every morning I wake up and go, full of joy into a warm subway full
of strangers. I feel happy when I go to the office. Yes. Think that I am a banker. I am a
particular, romantic banker. During the whole day some very exciting papers come
across my desk and I feel myself so important when I participate in the Nation’s destiny.
After all this is a work of extremely social interest and it makes me feel happy. I feel
fulfilled when I take care of all those papers.”

Your male friend will believe that you became crazy or will suspect that you are gay.

I remember Franco went on to talk about seeing the birds through the window and feeling a connection to nature despite working in the office.

Curious about the impact weights of sensory descriptions vs. emotions (and how to actually describe abstract emotions vs. simply labeling)....

 

[Kshatrap A.V.]

Here's Franco's example from the other thread.

I used bold text for what seems to be emotions, and underline for sensory words.

So it seems to be a good example of light on the tangible and heavy on the emotional. I still need to read the book in depth. Very interesting distinction.



I remember Franco went on to talk about seeing the birds through the window and feeling a connection to nature despite working in the office.

Curious about the impact weights of sensory descriptions vs. emotions (and how to actually describe abstract emotions vs. simply labeling)....

Regarding the example you gave, does it work on women and if it does then How can one make it look like he is not yapping. Cuz, sometimes that's why i kept what i had to say short cuz i was afraid of this.

 

[PaulieFlyn10]

Here's Franco's example from the other thread.

I used bold text for what seems to be emotions, and underline for sensory words.

So it seems to be a good example of light on the tangible and heavy on the emotional. I still need to read the book in depth. Very interesting distinction.



I remember Franco went on to talk about seeing the birds through the window and feeling a connection to nature despite working in the office.

Curious about the impact weights of sensory descriptions vs. emotions (and how to actually describe abstract emotions vs. simply labeling)....

Which of his books is this in?

 

[Francis]

Which of his books is this in?

2004 Manual of Seduction

Your male friend will believe that you became crazy or will suspect that you are gay.
Well. Talking to a woman in that way you will give her exactly what she wants.
Even if she is an executive in some company, if she is a modern woman trying to show
the “tough guy attitude”, don't let her fool you: the way to bring her into your bed is
exactly the same with her as with other women.
This is exactly the way you need to talk to a woman if you want to seduce her. Also,
this is one of the most important means for creating an attraction which is great for
proceeding slowly to the following phase of the seduction.
So in order to seduce her you need to:
- Color your speech with emotions, sensations and universal abstract concepts, not
necessarily great emotions but any emotion; both positive and negative ones are very
good.
- Even more important: you need to learn to follow the course of her emotions.
- And extremely important is to learn to exchange emotions with her.
An important concept about women: never keep women from feeling negative
emotions.
Women love negative emotions as much as positive ones.
This is very much different from what your parents and teachers told you, so if a
woman feels negative emotions, don't try to help her, don't try to keep her from feeling
these emotions or you risk coming across as an unattractive “nice guy” and breaking the
Rapport with her resulting in her slowly becoming your enemy.

 

[James Cruse]

Here's Franco's example from the other thread.

I used bold text for what seems to be emotions, and underline for sensory words.

So it seems to be a good example of light on the tangible and heavy on the emotional. I still need to read the book in depth. Very interesting distinction.



I remember Franco went on to talk about seeing the birds through the window and feeling a connection to nature despite working in the office.

Curious about the impact weights of sensory descriptions vs. emotions (and how to actually describe abstract emotions vs. simply labeling)....

This example from Franco is one of the many ways I knew he had closely read and used the Sexual Key book.
In the book, J.D. Fuentes uses an example of something you could say to a woman about working in a paper company and doing filing - using this job as an example of how you can transform the most boring, banal and uneventful topic into something so seductive and full of emotionality an that women would deeply enjoy and be stimulated by (while having almost no relevant content, information or point).

 

[Glow]

Not the “sexual key nlp method” you are referring to OP but something related to (as in the language is emotional, descriptive, and designed to arouse) it I’ve been using a lot, in person and over text, is telling women I’m writing a fiction book. That’s the bait.

If you timed if right and the girl is at least someone interested she will ask about it.

This is where you tell her that it’s “to dirty for her” and tease her about sticking to PG-13 things due to “inability to handle it.”

Tease her about it and then make her jump thru hoops before you show her anything.

Then I show her a less sexual passage I wrote that leads up to a sexual encounter between two characters. I take it away righr when it gets good.

Should note; this passage is short. Women don’t really want to read a while book!

This always leads to them wanting to read the sexual scene that happens next.

Again tease her.

Then I hand her my phone (or text it to her) and let her read the 6 paragraph extremely graphic, detailed, and emotional sex scene where the male uses expert foreplay on the female character.

This is also a form of sexual prizing because any woman who reads it will instantly understand that I have to be good in bed to be able to write it.

They often want to read the rest of the scene. I tel them “it’s not written yet. I’m still looking for…. Inspiration….” Then shut up and look DEEP into her eyes and eye fuck her.

Works better in person for that reason. Still works over text too.

Can go so many places after that and women get very aroused from it.

This is actually a really interesting idea on another front.

To be "a writer".. she discovers.

The rest of your story could be at home - you could invite her to go read it - you would really like to hear her thoughts... you have 3 that are in progress at your desk. I bet girls will invite themselves home to read it.

Build up a SDL model around being a writer - using intrique for her to want to elicit it out eg.

i used to use the theme of "sexual fantasies" which is a gambit-area for me but never thought about playing "a writer" along prizing.. Genius. easy to do it on fantasies and just adjust it to being a writer/reading them vs using it mainly as sex talk.