The numbers game + good looks can get you results.... to a CERTAIN extent.
Doing 75 lays a year would at LEAST result in a better theoretical understand of the game, social dynamics and women than you seem to show here (you show the most basic and superficial degree of understanding). Your technical understand of game is apparently very low, since "you just go for greens". For those who consider this a viable strategy understand that:
- Women need to be into you from the get-go to be obvious greens. Being good looking or high value helps here. so it is not "just go for greens". It is easier for some than others. Even good looking guys with high value will not get that many greens because most women will actually judge a man by his first impression by distance, but the real assessment of the man takes place WITHIN THE INTERACTION.
- Spotting those signs of interest can be HARD in chaotic environment - so it is not that easy to SPOT THEM - here we have an epistemic limitation.
- Women who may be into you, due to their submissive nature will RARELY display that much interest from the get-go - making it hard to see whether she is "red" or "green". Women would hold back signs of interest as a mean to test the man in question. This is ESPECIALLY the case for women of HIGH SMV (sexual market value). So even if the woman is into you from the get go, she may not show it.
- Women may be really into you, and actually be a GREEN without actually making things any easier for you. She may get overstimulated (female state control) or actually have very high levels of anti-slut defense.... making her "hard to get" despite being into you. The idea that "attraction" necessarily leads to sex is a flawed and over simplified view of pick up. Her showing strong signs of interest does not necessarily increase the odds of her going home with you.
- Now consider she is a sexually confident girl and also into you (no ASD and high level of interest) other contextual factors, which you NEVER EVER mention can also play in.
Naturalmikey method has a lot of theoretical flaws that would have to be answered in order to be seen as a legit method here. Until then, all his claims will remain questionable in my book.
I know people who pull approx as many girls a year, myself included, but he shares no similarities with them. They have technical understanding, theoretical understand and usually have a pretty advanced arsenal at their disposal. Naturalmikey has none of them.
My advice to readers of this forum, would be to take any statement about lay count with a serious grain of salt, and judge the skill and the value of the poster by the usefulness of the content. This is how it has been done historically, where people have gained ranks and respect in this community as a result of their content and the success others have had with it. Lay counts was never really a predominant factor (not claiming it does not matter - we simply barely talk about it - actually the pros talks about ratio over lay count. )
So no sorry to disappoint you gentlemen, there ain't no such a thing as a free lunch.
Best,