What's new

The manosphere is dead but now we are back to lookism wtf!

James Cruse

Cro-Magnon Man
Cro-Magnon Man
Joined
Jun 5, 2020
Messages
327
This manosphere doco is about 4 years too late - all the interviews he did are years old, at the youngest. Theroux really missed the boat on this movement by a long way. I read that he tried another documentary on men but it wasn't controversial enough and came off as unintentionally sympathetic to men, so the funding was dumped for it and he salvaged parts of it for this documentary.

Theroux knew it would be Boomer slop for perpetually offended pearl clutchers, that's the only audience his shtick actually appeals to (ala Louis looking awkwardly to the camera with a perplexed silly glum look on his face while people do very uncontroversial things).

HSTikkyTokky called out Louis' weird staring down the barrel of the camera looking silly by doing the same thing himself, until Louis has to tell him to stop and talk to him rather than the camera (only Louis himself is allowed give looks to the camera haha).

I think the most telling part is they never addressed the women's participation in the manosphere or those men's lives or gave any balance to the fact that there are plenty of women involved, enjoying being there (for various motivations) and are actually attracted to these men.
The whole aim of the documentary would become moot if they actually investigated why the women were there or attracted to those men.
 

Ratata

Tribal Elder
Tribal Elder
Joined
Sep 14, 2024
Messages
171
if you are high value (money, looks etc..) but low status behaviors, you are not going to have success....(Neil mention this in the interview i posted)
QFT. I know some extremely handsome men who should do well with women, but who more often than not end up as depressed wallflowers. They get rejected often, and hard, because they are needy and uncalibrated. And due to that their self esteem is rock bottom.

Meanwhile I know some of the most nerdy looking guys who just slay with women, and would tool the handsome guy in the most fun and sympathetic way. So no wonder girls love those nerds! Like, guys who get mogged by these nerds love every moment of it, all the while being robbed of the girls they tried to pick up! And then they still wonder why they ended up alone that night, sigh... It's so poetic!

I think the lookosphere does one simple thing wrong. It's called "correlation does not imply causation." Cuz - sure - let's face it, looking good will get you some freebies now and then. But if you fuck up in a social circle, looks won't save you. Only social value will, and you can't buy that with money. And if you're really depressed or needy in the club, girls will shun you like the plague no matter how physically handsome you are.

Looks is just one advantage you can put in your tool belt, and it's not even the most important one.
 
a good date brings a smile to your lips... and hers

Francis

Cro-Magnon Man
Cro-Magnon Man
Joined
Mar 27, 2023
Messages
2,417
Ok so SNL referenced "frame-mogging"

Serious semantics question, did "mog" come from "amog", an acronym meaning alpha male of the group? I think Beckster renamed/framed it "alpha male other guy" for himself.

So it became a verb somehow? Like mogging is betaizing or dominating?

 

James Cruse

Cro-Magnon Man
Cro-Magnon Man
Joined
Jun 5, 2020
Messages
327
I think the lookosphere does one simple thing wrong. It's called "correlation does not imply causation." Cuz - sure - let's face it, looking good will get you some freebies now and then. But if you fuck up in a social circle, looks won't save you. Only social value will, and you can't buy that with money. And if you're really depressed or needy in the club, girls will shun you like the plague no matter how physically handsome you are.

Looks is just one advantage you can put in your tool belt, and it's not even the most important one.

I think this comes down to men not understanding that good looking men and above average looking men and average men can all fail seducing women for the EXACT SAME REASON: Poor nervous weird tense unconfident Body language

But on the flip side - those same good looking, above average or average men CAN do well with a HUGE help (just help, body language doesn't do the WHOLE seduction for you, obviously) from having great calm, relaxed body language.

Most men don't see or really understand the importance of body language, or dismiss it as nothing. Why? We're projecting our own masculine looks-based perception of the world onto women and their wants.

I know men don't care about body language because everywhere I go - so many men have horrid body language, even good looking men trying to seduce women.
I can count on one hand the amount of men that I've seen with truly good body language over the last year (or more). Those guys with that great body language - certainly aren't doing it intentionally.
They didn't coach themselves to get better body langauge, they didn't stretch, they didn't meditate or do yoga or build their own relaxation or confidence.
Whatever they're lifestyle and activities has led them to have great body language (by chance) - and they're using it to do better in the world and be seductive to women and their other pursuits.

Even coaches I see doing seduction have extremely poor body language - and they should know better and have been exposed to plenty of resources and prompting about improving their body language, so it happens even in the seduction sphere. Which may perhaps account for their inconsistent seductions.
What hope is there that normal guys watching these streamers will know about it or fix it?
 
Last edited:

Will_V

Chieftan
Staff member
tribal-elder
Joined
Jan 24, 2021
Messages
2,672
The original manosphere was the mrm, the mgtow and the seduction community:

- the seduction community died when rsd Julien did his stupid shit! and then continue to die till 6 feet under.

-mrm died and mgtow (around same time due to woke culture)

- puahate and the looks maxers (died).- tldr was dude to Eliot rogers Shooting

Then the red pill took over:

-Rollo, fresh and fit, tate,

^ all of that died (mainly over reaching, stupidity, scandals, prison,) and all them pretty much fraud.

There were similar manosphere light players:

Jordan Peterson (never understood his appeal) scandal of some sort
Dan Balzirian (similar to the above ^ with how inherit his stuff and the likes)
fitness community also died (after zyzz was gone till 6 feet under)

and the latest Joe Rogan (used to be independent/centrist sold out to Trump (this backfired) plus moving comedians into a weird right wing circle jerk in (austin texas). All of this backfired so he is rest in piece....

From forums, people went to private chats and youtube, to tiktok and to kick or whatever it is....

So it seems the stuff circle back to blackpill (for god sake) so now who is taking over is black pill, lookism looks maxes.... I just recently learn about him clav or whatever his name is.... So we are back on the looksmaxing silly cycle.... Which as a former participant of that community is the worst community there is to be honest... Pretty niolistic, limiting, belief, causation correlation shit, and pure trolling(and they don't really get laid even less than all of the other communities put together).... Anyways they are good with the look maxing stuff (but even them are not good with style and fashion maxing which i think is even more important, clav fashion is pretty basic/normie)



Shout out to Chase's mouse utopia article, one of my favourites.

Toward the end, only incel 'Beautiful Ones' male mice and non-reproducing females remained.
 

Duff

Space Monkey
space monkey
Joined
Mar 26, 2024
Messages
31
I think this comes down to men not understanding that good looking men and above average looking men and average men can all fail seducing women for the EXACT SAME REASON: Poor nervous weird tense unconfident Body language

But on the flip side - those same good looking, above average or average men CAN do well with a HUGE help (just help, body language doesn't do the WHOLE seduction for you, obviously) from having great calm, relaxed body language.

Most men don't see or really understand the importance of body language, or dismiss it as nothing. Why? We're projecting our own masculine looks-based perception of the world onto women and their wants.

I know men don't care about body language because everywhere I go - so many men have horrid body language, even good looking men trying to seduce women.
I can count on one hand the amount of men that I've seen with truly good body language over the last year (or more). Those guys with that great body language - certainly aren't doing it intentionally.
They didn't coach themselves to get better body langauge, they didn't stretch, they didn't meditate or do yoga or build their own relaxation or confidence.
Whatever they're lifestyle and activities has led them to have great body language (by chance) - and they're using it to do better in the world and be seductive to women and their other pursuits.

Even coaches I see doing seduction have extremely poor body language - and they should know better and have been exposed to plenty of resources and prompting about improving their body language, so it happens even in the seduction sphere. Which may perhaps account for their inconsistent seductions.
What hope is there that normal guys watching these streamers will know about it or fix it?
What is the best way u found to improve body language since u mentioned meditation and yoga
 

Francis

Cro-Magnon Man
Cro-Magnon Man
Joined
Mar 27, 2023
Messages
2,417
What is the best way u found to improve body language since u mentioned meditation and yoga
I am interested in the answer too.

Teevster has mentioned the product Beyond Words before. I believe it's a video lecture series from Love Systems, but not sure if it's available anymore.

Chase has a "fantastic fundamentals" video series on GC TV, and also articles with stuff like the Alexander Technique and other body language principles.
 

Skills

Tribal Elder
Tribal Elder
Joined
Nov 11, 2019
Messages
7,542
I think this comes down to men not understanding that good looking men and above average looking men and average men can all fail seducing women for the EXACT SAME REASON: Poor nervous weird tense unconfident Body language

But on the flip side - those same good looking, above average or average men CAN do well with a HUGE help (just help, body language doesn't do the WHOLE seduction for you, obviously) from having great calm, relaxed body language.

Most men don't see or really understand the importance of body language, or dismiss it as nothing. Why? We're projecting our own masculine looks-based perception of the world onto women and their wants.

I know men don't care about body language because everywhere I go - so many men have horrid body language, even good looking men trying to seduce women.
I can count on one hand the amount of men that I've seen with truly good body language over the last year (or more). Those guys with that great body language - certainly aren't doing it intentionally.
They didn't coach themselves to get better body langauge, they didn't stretch, they didn't meditate or do yoga or build their own relaxation or confidence.
Whatever they're lifestyle and activities has led them to have great body language (by chance) - and they're using it to do better in the world and be seductive to women and their other pursuits.

Even coaches I see doing seduction have extremely poor body language - and they should know better and have been exposed to plenty of resources and prompting about improving their body language, so it happens even in the seduction sphere. Which may perhaps account for their inconsistent seductions.
What hope is there that normal guys watching these streamers will know about it or fix it?
I disagree i know plenty of guys with poor body language that get laid...


Good looking guys a lot of them lack reps, a lot of them are entitled and lazy (with effort).... and again as i said they also have low value behaviors, and some have aa....


anyways i am not saying body language not Important is part of fundamentals, but is far away from the most important part, not even close.... But again that is why we have a forum everybody has different opinions....

Also i am pro look maxing, I just don't think the "look maxers/black pillers" are the right people to take over, they are worst than the red pillers by a mile..... (actually invisible(one of the original pua haters most popular guy, i have a video with him) used to call himself red piller and the look maxers, then they change the name to black pill to distance themselves from the now red pillers....


^ i know all of the above cause i was part of the communities a lot of my humor, and behavior (like a few people get mad at me from how i express myself recently james, cause i was heavily influence by that community) they are just no good on how to teach attractive behaviors, body language, fashion etc.... just good teaching asthetics...
 
Last edited:

Will_V

Chieftan
Staff member
tribal-elder
Joined
Jan 24, 2021
Messages
2,672
I disagree i know plenty of guys with poor body language that get laid...

What do you mean by poor body language?

IMO it's about what your body communicates about how you see yourself. I've never seen a guy with body language that communicates low self esteem, or body language that's stiff/inhibited, who's done well with women. Every guy I've seen who's done exceptionally well has body language that's at least expressive and fluid.

On the other hand stuff like a straight posture, chest out, etc, is less important, it's better to have but not really a determining factor.
 

Chase

Chieftan
Staff member
tribal-elder
Joined
Oct 9, 2012
Messages
6,891
Looksmax has been around since the incel forum days but it recently went super "mainstream."

There is always some thing that captures the zeitgeist, usually in blowback against the prior zeitgeist:

  • 1990s: every guy was trying to be women's friend to get laid.
  • 2000s: guys were getting sick of the friend zone, so PUA got big.
  • 2010s: guys were getting sick of cold approach rejections, so dating apps got big.
  • 2020s: guys were getting sick of being ignored on dating apps, so looksmaxxing got big.

The stuff is all useful for whatever it is (you can get laid as a girl's friend by doing the Tao of Steve method; PUA obviously works if you are not acting creepy or autistic or running neo-direct; dating apps work if you get your profile & messaging down; looksmax is useful if you also develop game and your other fundamentals besides the ones most looksmax guys focus on).

The problem is that whenever it goes mainstream, it becomes this "magic pill" that everyone flocks to thinking it will magically get them automatic results.

But, since most guys do not put the energy into understanding whatever it is and are looking for a quick fix, it doesn't work, and the masses of men get very frustrated with it and long for a solution.

Then the Next Big Thing comes along.

The problem is, once a thing is past its prime in the zeitgeist people get way too sour on it.

Honestly, with how isolated everyone is now, "be some girl's friend and deal with the friend zone" would actually be better for the average guy than what a lot of guys are doing now, which is "I'm not even going to interact with females! I will not stand to be insulted and toyed with!" and then they turn into incel monks. At least dudes in the friend zone would occasionally get laid and get girlfriends. Dudes with no women in their lives at all get zip.

A similar thing has happened to PUA. Once the zeitgeist switched to dating apps, nobody wanted to do pickup anymore. "Everyone knows that doesn't work" etc.

I am seeing the same thing with dating apps now. People are trashing apps hard. The app companies have lost money and stock valuation and done a bunch of layoffs (Tinder & especially Bumble are declining; the only one doing very well right now is Hinge).

The looksmax thing has been building for years though.

We've had guys coming onto Girls Chase articles since 2015 arguing that "none of this stuff works. Don't you guys know the only thing women care about is looks??!"

I spent forever trying to figure out how these guys started thinking like this... then realized they were all dating app rejects who didn't approach women in real life and had tried dating apps and flamed out... then concluded that the reason why was because "Chad's getting all the girls, leaving none for the rest of us."

Thus, looksmax gains steam ("If you can't beat Chad, become Chad!").
 

Skills

Tribal Elder
Tribal Elder
Joined
Nov 11, 2019
Messages
7,542
On the other hand stuff like a straight posture, chest out, etc, is less important, it's better to have but not really a determining factor.
^ that is what i am saying "no determinine factor"... maybe poor is not the right word, but no the best body language, i think for me goes like this:

hygine
neediness managment
fitness
style
humor
leadership
manliness(polarity)
'but not be like at the top" again we all have different opinions... I have poor body language for example (does not affect me at all).... Actually me able to read others vibe and body language even more important than my own...

But anyways is semantics, i just see it personally as you said not as "determining factor"
 

Skills

Tribal Elder
Tribal Elder
Joined
Nov 11, 2019
Messages
7,542
Looksmax has been around since the incel forum days but it recently went super "mainstream."

There is always some thing that captures the zeitgeist, usually in blowback against the prior zeitgeist:

  • 1990s: every guy was trying to be women's friend to get laid.
  • 2000s: guys were getting sick of the friend zone, so PUA got big.
  • 2010s: guys were getting sick of cold approach rejections, so dating apps got big.
  • 2020s: guys were getting sick of being ignored on dating apps, so looksmaxxing got big.

The stuff is all useful for whatever it is (you can get laid as a girl's friend by doing the Tao of Steve method; PUA obviously works if you are not acting creepy or autistic or running neo-direct; dating apps work if you get your profile & messaging down; looksmax is useful if you also develop game and your other fundamentals besides the ones most looksmax guys focus on).

The problem is that whenever it goes mainstream, it becomes this "magic pill" that everyone flocks to thinking it will magically get them automatic results.

But, since most guys do not put the energy into understanding whatever it is and are looking for a quick fix, it doesn't work, and the masses of men get very frustrated with it and long for a solution.

Then the Next Big Thing comes along.

The problem is, once a thing is past its prime in the zeitgeist people get way too sour on it.

Honestly, with how isolated everyone is now, "be some girl's friend and deal with the friend zone" would actually be better for the average guy than what a lot of guys are doing now, which is "I'm not even going to interact with females! I will not stand to be insulted and toyed with!" and then they turn into incel monks. At least dudes in the friend zone would occasionally get laid and get girlfriends. Dudes with no women in their lives at all get zip.

A similar thing has happened to PUA. Once the zeitgeist switched to dating apps, nobody wanted to do pickup anymore. "Everyone knows that doesn't work" etc.

I am seeing the same thing with dating apps now. People are trashing apps hard. The app companies have lost money and stock valuation and done a bunch of layoffs (Tinder & especially Bumble are declining; the only one doing very well right now is Hinge).

The looksmax thing has been building for years though.

We've had guys coming onto Girls Chase articles since 2015 arguing that "none of this stuff works. Don't you guys know the only thing women care about is looks??!"

I spent forever trying to figure out how these guys started thinking like this... then realized they were all dating app rejects who didn't approach women in real life and had tried dating apps and flamed out... then concluded that the reason why was because "Chad's getting all the girls, leaving none for the rest of us."

Thus, looksmax gains steam ("If you can't beat Chad, become Chad!").
well again ^ yes, but the point is that the guys in that community are not good at getting people results per se....

people will be like " i am not like this and that" is over for me, or i will WAIT, till i be like this and that....

It is a pretty bad community, one of the worst i ever seen....

and again the point is that the new tate, is a blackpiller....
 

Francis

Cro-Magnon Man
Cro-Magnon Man
Joined
Mar 27, 2023
Messages
2,417
Good inner game I think can govern some of body language... Like when walking with a girl, how jerky are you, how much do you face her, how you look at her in response to her words, eye contact usage, do you have approval seeking needy quirks like nodding a lot, and every part of how you touch her...

Communicating moment to moment really... Also how you stand on the approach or sit on a date... micro escalation is all body language, etc.

Anyways I wonder if a new looksmaxx leader will rise from the ashes or if the media takedown will have an effect. Like they have painted him as ridiculous, but I don't know if it matters to those type of followers, same as tate
 

Will_V

Chieftan
Staff member
tribal-elder
Joined
Jan 24, 2021
Messages
2,672
^ that is what i am saying "no determinine factor"... maybe poor is not the right word, but no the best body language, i think for me goes like this:

hygine
neediness managment
fitness
style
humor
leadership
manliness(polarity)
'but not be like at the top" again we all have different opinions... I have poor body language for example (does not affect me at all).... Actually me able to read others vibe and body language even more important than my own...

But anyways is semantics, i just see it personally as you said not as "determining factor"

"Neediness management" is right at the top imo, I believe it all comes back to frame control as Mystery pointed out, whatever weakens frame is just bad. The worst would be:

- Neediness
- Incongruence
- Inhibition
- Reactiveness

I've not seen a guy do well with women whose body language communicates these. I've seen guys who are soft looking, a bit hunched maybe, definitely not 'alpha' looking, but their body language still expresses a very self-confident/self-absorbed, expressive, uninhibited, non-reactive frame.
 

Skills

Tribal Elder
Tribal Elder
Joined
Nov 11, 2019
Messages
7,542
"Neediness management" is right at the top imo, I believe it all comes back to frame control as Mystery pointed out, whatever weakens frame is just bad. The worst would be:

- Neediness
- Incongruence
- Inhibition
- Reactiveness

I've not seen a guy do well with women whose body language communicates these. I've seen guys who are soft looking, a bit hunched maybe, definitely not 'alpha' looking, but their body language still expresses a very self-confident/self-absorbed, expressive, uninhibited, non-reactive frame.
yeah all of that is good "attractive behaviors" subcommunications that are important, i do still think hygiene is tops.... But my point is body language is important (fundamentals) but to say the MOST important, is a bit of overhyped, is my point...

But again body language is important and part of fundamentals, and you need to maximaze body language, but is not the "main factor" is my point.... Maybe i get away with it cause of dancing, but my body language is not the best cause my hip socket is misplaced (due to martial arts) so i have a leg slightly longer than other (you can't really tell) but makes me wabble at times...

Best body language in the community is Cajun in my opinion btw....
 

James Cruse

Cro-Magnon Man
Cro-Magnon Man
Joined
Jun 5, 2020
Messages
327
I disagree i know plenty of guys with poor body language that get laid...


Good looking guys a lot of them lack reps, a lot of them are entitled and lazy (with effort).... and again as i said they also have low value behaviors, and some have aa....
IMO it's about what your body communicates about how you see yourself. I've never seen a guy with body language that communicates low self esteem, or body language that's stiff/inhibited, who's done well with women. Every guy I've seen who's done exceptionally well has body language that's at least expressive and fluid.

Respectfully Skills, Will is correct here:
I've never seen a natural seducer who didn't have top body language passively, and more importantly great body language when under pressure. They also need to actually approach aswell, but the great body language is a crucial part of being a natural.
It's relaxed, fluid, lacking in tension and is unreactive - even under pressure or in a tense situation.

Any other guy that I know (non-naturals) that does well seducing women has very good body language (perhaps not the best, but very good calm fluid body language).

The only people I've seen do well with average body language are extremely good looking men, but they didn't do better than guys with better body language around them (who are less attractive).
I think good looking men's non-exceptional body language is what stops them approaching and doing well with women or is simply a result of not approaching (the chicken or the egg).

When I go to a club, and I want to see who my (potential) competition is, I look for:

1. Who has the best body language (and are they approaching)?

2. Who is physically good looking (without good body langauge) and are they approaching?

3. Who are men (and women) positioning their body towards? Are they one of the people above or do they have something else these people want?

That's it. You don't need to know who the men of status are or who has what or wearing what - it's those factors which you can see fairly quickly in any venue to see what the landscape will be.

This is why women in nighttime venues see you and notice you long before you've approached her - she's seen your body language and how people respond to you and how your body language responds to them and has already assessed your social value from this.
Women are scanning these venues for the above, and much more, constantly in clubs and even at work, school, events, etc.

When I see any group of men now, I can pick out the one who is the leader, who's been successful seducing women (not usually the same guy) - it's very clear to me now from a small amount of observation.

The problem is that whenever it goes mainstream, it becomes this "magic pill" that everyone flocks to thinking it will magically get them automatic results.

But, since most guys do not put the energy into understanding whatever it is and are looking for a quick fix, it doesn't work, and the masses of men get very frustrated with it and long for a solution.

I think this has happened to seduction, even here, where guys forget what's useful and important in seduction because it becomes less spoken about or is dismissed because it's not being said anymore.

I've been looking through the old archives of masf and other seduction forums and there's so much value in what those guys were saying, that nobody talks about anymore in the seduction industry. Those guys figured out alot about seduction and women that solves alot of seduction issues that guys are even having on this forum.

I spent forever trying to figure out how these guys started thinking like this... then realized they were all dating app rejects who didn't approach women in real life and had tried dating apps and flamed out... then concluded that the reason why was because "Chad's getting all the girls, leaving none for the rest of us."

"Looksmaxxing" is purely motivated by men doing poorly in dating apps and deciding to (try to) get extremely good looking, rather than upskill themselves, fix their body language and cold approach.

There's another user on here, who is clearly black pill, who's constant reframe is "only good looking men do well with women" - it's dead giveaway that they never cold approach and haven't in a long time and solely rely on dating apps to meet women, no matter how much they protest that they approach.

"Neediness management" is right at the top imo, I believe it all comes back to frame control as Mystery pointed out, whatever weakens frame is just bad. The worst would be:

- Neediness
- Incongruence
- Inhibition
- Reactiveness

I've not seen a guy do well with women whose body language communicates these. I've seen guys who are soft looking, a bit hunched maybe, definitely not 'alpha' looking, but their body language still expresses a very self-confident/self-absorbed, expressive, uninhibited, non-reactive frame.

Exactly. I think @Skills - you thought we meant "good posture" by good body language, that's not the case. It's relaxed, calm, fluid, un-reactive body language (especially under tension filled situations).

yeah all of that is good "attractive behaviors" subcommunications that are important, i do still think hygiene is tops.... But my point is body language is important (fundamentals) but to say the MOST important, is a bit of overhyped, is my point...

I see hygiene as just another sensory factor in body language - a man's smell communicates alot of information to people around him, including health and testosterone levels (to women) in a passive way, whether people are conscious of it or not.
So, this is just 'body language by smell' essentially.

But again body language is important and part of fundamentals, and you need to maximaze body language, but is not the "main factor" is my point.... Maybe i get away with it cause of dancing, but my body language is not the best cause my hip socket is misplaced (due to martial arts) so i have a leg slightly longer than other (you can't really tell) but makes me wabble at times...

I think dance is as an active form of body language, Aaron Sleazy did the same and I use it in clubs aswell.
Women like men who dance well because it's an active form of body language.

Women say that dancing is about how good he is in bed, this is a lie. Women won't be logically aware that they're noticing great body language through dancing, which leads them to being attracted to his fluid relaxed movements. That doesn't register consciously with women, but they feel it.

Women seeing us interacting with other people and women in clubs and our body language in response to those people = Another Active form of Body language that people observe (like dancing).

I think women know they get a better sense of a man when they see his "Active forms of body language" rather than only his passive forms of body language (seeing a man only walking or standing by himself).

I think women see men with great body language but reserve their judgement of him and his value until they see a consistant active form of his body language as a baseline.

I think actors, in many ways, perform an active form of body language which they use to gain status. I suspect it's why so many former theatre kids and former trained actors become so powerful outside the entertainment industry later in life.


The point is: relaxed body language is a huge rate-limiter and determination of success in seduction. Many men have forgotten this because women aren't actually seeing their body language because they're only seeing their photos on dating profiles.
Men don't understand this for the same reason.


Many women I've met instinctively understand this and have met good looking men from apps and realised how awkward or weird these men are in person, because this is her first time observing his body language (on the first date from the app).
 
Last edited:

Will_V

Chieftan
Staff member
tribal-elder
Joined
Jan 24, 2021
Messages
2,672
The point is: relaxed body language is a huge rate-limiter and determination of success in seduction. Many men have forgotten this because women aren't actually seeing their body language because they're only seeing their photos on dating profiles.
Men don't understand this for the same reason.

Well put. You can get a very vague feeling of someone's frame control from a photo, especially in a group photo (though for obvious reasons guys aren't usually putting group photos on apps), but importantly it tells nothing about who he is under pressure as you pointed out.

So women can't really use it to determine what sort of guy he is, so she just defers to static variables such as how good looking he is or how tall he is.

That criteria radically changes in competitive social environments, where she can easily separate the wheat from the chaff.
 
Top