What's new

what is nlp? does it even work?

tornado

Space Monkey
space monkey
Joined
Dec 15, 2025
Messages
61
Lately I've been wanting to check out Ross Jeffries stuff. But I just can't actually believe that nlp works or not. Because people say that it has been debunked. But all the second gen verbals use nlp. What about countries that don't speak English (Fortunately in my country people speak decent English). I've been wanting to learn nlp because I am short of seduction material that I can use. My biggest sticking point is early game where you have to hook the girl after the opener. I also am very bad at improvising stuff. I have been wanting to learn Sex Talk gambits too but @Teevster says it is not for beginners. And many of the classic indirect routines seem to be built for countries like USA where they mention some things that only are relevant in USA (Like the calling girls powerpuff girls etc). So nlp patterns and stuff like Sex Talk seems to be relevant for every girl no matter what country. @West_Indian_Archie calls it a neuro-level game I guess. There is also no step by step guide for indirect daygame as it is there for night game. And my ratio because of direct game has been very bad (I only do walking sets on the street) So do you recommend learning it because it seems like the only option?
 
Last edited:

Teevster

Tribal Elder
Tribal Elder
Joined
Aug 23, 2013
Messages
2,431
And many of the classic indirect routines seem to be built for countries like USA where they mention some things that only are relevant in USA (Like the calling girls powerpuff girls etc).

The calling the girls the powerpuff girls is a hook gambit that I use, and that, unless I am mistaken, was invented by me.

I have never used it in the USA.

-Teevster
 

Maddash

Space Monkey
space monkey
Joined
Feb 3, 2026
Messages
21
Lately I've been wanting to check out Ross Jeffries stuff. But I just can't actually believe that nlp works or not. Because people say that it has been debunked. But all the second gen verbals use nlp. What about countries that don't speak English (Fortunately in my country people speak decent English). I've been wanting to learn nlp because I am short of seduction material that I can use. My biggest sticking point is early game where you have to hook the girl after the opener. I also am very bad at improvising stuff. I have been wanting to learn Sex Talk gambits too but @Teevster says it is not for beginners. And many of the classic indirect routines seem to be built for countries like USA where they mention some things that only are relevant in USA (Like the calling girls powerpuff girls etc). So nlp patterns and stuff like Sex Talk seems to be relevant for every girl no matter what country. @West_Indian_Archie calls it a neuro-level game I guess. There is also no step by step guide for indirect daygame as it is there for night game. And my ratio because of direct game has been very bad (I only do walking sets on the street) So do you recommend learning it because it seems like the only option?
NLP as a whole is pretty questionable scientifically and a lot of it is basically pseudoscience, so I definitely wouldn’t tell a beginner to go down the rabbit hole and start reading 800 page NLP books lol.


That said, there are useful pieces inside it. Ross Jeffries especially has some really good material on language, emotional association, framing and creating a certain vibe. Just don’t treat it like magic mind control.


If you’re still early in game, I’d focus way more on natural fundamentals first: creating a vibe, being playful, building tension, reading her reactions, escalating properly and actually getting comfortable talking to women.


Then later you can steal the useful NLP concepts and add them on top. NLP should be an extra tool, not the foundation of your game.
 

Teevster

Tribal Elder
Tribal Elder
Joined
Aug 23, 2013
Messages
2,431
NLP as a whole is pretty questionable scientifically and a lot of it is basically pseudoscience, so I definitely wouldn’t tell a beginner to go down the rabbit hole and start reading 800 page NLP books lol.

NLP is, as you say, a form of pseudoscience, but has shown practical benefits numerous times. Just because something is pseudoscience does not mean it does not work.

Also a lot of what you find within NLP already exists in different forms of psychology and many concepts are taken from for example linguistics. NLP is like a re-packaged system, made practical, for coaching and other practical purposes - with some religiosity in it (depending on which circle you enter).

In regards to patterns and verbal related stuff like the Milton model (derived from practice) is being researched now within a subfield called neuro-semantics.
 
the right date makes getting her back home a piece of cake

Jamster

Cro-Magnon Man
Cro-Magnon Man
Joined
Mar 11, 2026
Messages
366
One thing about NLP that seems to work well is using language that describes what you want.

I suspect embedded commands probably do not work well. Using the classic Ross Jeffries example "below me," where "below me"="blow me" probably doesn't work well.

OTOH, something like "The weekend was intensely exciting, but in the end, it was also comfortable," sets a good tone. That's an NLP thing, i guess?

It was suggested by someone back in mASF that the NLP schtick really does work - on the person using it.

So if you are telling some cute, big lipped girl "The end of the hike was a great climax because NOW the valley was BELOW ME," and the image in your head, as you triangular gaze at her eyes and her juicy mouth is "climax NOW, BLOW ME," she is unlikely to pick up on the pun, even unconsciously, but IS likely to see that you are excited to talk with her and sexual, too.

And when I tried it - decades ago - that's how it worked for me.

The calling the girls the powerpuff girls is a hook gambit that I use, and that, unless I am mistaken, was invented by me.

I remember that from mASF -because I had to google "powerpuff girls." @Teevster, if that was you, I salute you as the inventor!

.
 

TimeMachineDAD

Tool-Bearing Hominid
Tool-Bearing Hominid
Joined
Jun 4, 2026
Messages
95
NLP is, as you say, a form of pseudoscience, but has shown practical benefits numerous times. Just because something is pseudoscience does not mean it does not work.

Also a lot of what you find within NLP already exists in different forms of psychology and many concepts are taken from for example linguistics. NLP is like a re-packaged system, made practical, for coaching and other practical purposes - with some religiosity in it (depending on which circle you enter).

In regards to patterns and verbal related stuff like the Milton model (derived from practice) is being researched now within a subfield called neuro-semantics.

Yep, that pretty much summed it up.
Big bunch of useful stuff that has been assimilated into PUA already.

For example concept of holding frame and reframing was originally nlp-concept.

Some rapport(I suppose nowadays it's called comfort) stuff and such is useful even outside of seduction.

And honestly good storytellers and charismatic people use lot's of NLP already without knowing it, because NLP was modelled from them.

On the other hand reciting NLP patterns verbatim to chick is even more creepy than reciting some mystery method canned shit.
:ROFLMAO:

For beginners your time would be best used for just learning basic pua and becoming social person.

I used to use nlp for my own state control during approach back in the day before it came naturally anchored to opening process. So this might perhaps best use for it for beginner.
 

Destiny

Tool-Bearing Hominid
Tool-Bearing Hominid
Joined
Jun 3, 2021
Messages
30
Just wanted to chime in on the part about girls that can't speak english well.

The main key is to talk in a way that makes them recall experiences and feelings.

For example A girl from taiwan may not understand if you say some shit like "Ever go skydiving? You're standing there looking out, anxious and afraid, but then you take the leap and the freedom of soaring over the clouds is exhilarating, as you fall you find all your worries melting away and you feel the deepest joy and wonder in your heart as you get closer and closer"

likely she'll just stare at you like you had 5 heads then excuse herself and leave.

however if you go "ever go skydiving?" then spin her around and stand behind her, holding her like a skydiving instructor while making wooshing sounds with your mouth?

She understands that just fine, you still make her recall the positive experiences with skydiving and associates it with you.

Its been awhile since I read anything NLP related and I'm sure there are better ways to do it verbally but thats my personal experience on how to use it with girls that cant really speak english well.
 

tornado

Space Monkey
space monkey
Joined
Dec 15, 2025
Messages
61
If you’re still early in game, I’d focus way more on natural fundamentals first: creating a vibe, being playful, building tension, reading her reactions, escalating properly and actually getting comfortable talking to women.
I am not a complete beginner. I have done more than 200 approaches before I took a break. but they have been very inconsistent.
I had a mental breakdown and I was so sexually frustrated because I couldn't even close a girl that was actually interested in me. You can check out more about this girl in my journal. This has happened many times. I feel like I don't have a proper structure for what comes after opener to actually number closing the girl. My non verbals are good (I have the problem of talking too fast, but I slow it down consciously), fashion wise I am good. I am also very silly so my conversations are playful sometimes. I can open girls consistently but the problem resides in what happens after I open. Also whenever I ask for some level of compliance I always get resistance and I don't know how to deal with it. (example: asking for her number, signalling her to hold my hand before we walk, moving her etc)
 
Last edited:

Maddash

Space Monkey
space monkey
Joined
Feb 3, 2026
Messages
21
I am not a complete beginner. I have done more than 200 approaches before I took a break. but they have been very inconsistent.
I had a mental breakdown and I was so sexually frustrated because I couldn't even close a girl that was actually interested in me. You can check out more about this girl in my journal. This has happened many times. I feel like I don't have a proper structure for what comes after opener to actually number closing the girl. My non verbals are good (I have the problem of talking too fast, but I slow it down consciously), fashion wise I am good. I am also very silly so my conversations are playful sometimes. I can open girls consistently but the problem resides in what happens after I open. Also whenever I ask for some level of compliance I always get resistance and I don't know how to deal with it. (example: asking for her number, signalling her to hold my hand before we walk, moving her etc)
200 approaches is a lot, so if you’re still consistently getting resistance on simple things like numbers, moving locations, holding hands etc, I would start looking on how you are transitioning.


I’m not really a mass approach guy. I’m pretty selective and mostly open girls I’m genuinely attracted to or find interesting, and if the interaction goes well I can nearly always close the contact info.

For me, closing contact info or suggesting a new location should feel almost casual, like its the obvious next step, not like making some huge move.



The way I think about it is basically doors. She already walked through the first door by staying in the conversation and investing. Then I get a good vibe going, make her laugh, let her invest a little, and when the interaction is at a good point or I’m about to leave, I open another door, and see if she goes through it.


Where I’m from Snapchat is normal, so I’ll usually just ask if she has snapchat (Everyone here does). For you that might be phone number, Instagram, whatever people actually use.


The key is making it relevant to the interaction. If you talked about something funny, a place, music, a pet, whatever, use that. “You have to send me that,” “I’ll send you the picture,” “remind me to show you X.” Then exchanging contact feels like continuation, not some random “can I get your number?” moment. (Personally ill often just ask something like "Do you have snap" but in my language and the way i say it, it sounds super casual and almost like i expect her to say yes, the reason i go so direct is because i know she most likely will give it to me)


Same with moving her somewhere else. Listen to what she’s saying and use it to bridge naturally. For example, if she’s talking about what she studies:

“Damn, that actually sounds kinda interesting. I wanna know how you even figured out you wanted to study that, but I could really use a coffee. Why don’t you join me?”

Now you’re not randomly trying to move her somewhere. You’re continuing the conversation somewhere else, so the transition feels natural.


If she hesitates or gives you a reason she can’t, don’t make it a thing. Just stay relaxed, something like “all good, I’ll see you around,” and keep the interaction normal. The last thing you want is to make the moment awkward just because she didn’t go along with the next step.


Snapchat/IG can also be lower friction than a phone number depending on your age/country. Personally I prefer Snap over Instagram because IG can turn into her judging your whole profile unless your profile is actually helping you.


Shoot me a DM if you want, I’d be happy to look at a couple actual examples and tell you where I think the resistance is coming from.
 

Maddash

Space Monkey
space monkey
Joined
Feb 3, 2026
Messages
21
NLP is, as you say, a form of pseudoscience, but has shown practical benefits numerous times. Just because something is pseudoscience does not mean it does not work.

Also a lot of what you find within NLP already exists in different forms of psychology and many concepts are taken from for example linguistics. NLP is like a re-packaged system, made practical, for coaching and other practical purposes - with some religiosity in it (depending on which circle you enter).

In regards to patterns and verbal related stuff like the Milton model (derived from practice) is being researched now within a subfield called neuro-semantics.
Yeah, I definitely agree that there are parts of NLP that can be useful. My issue is more that the explanations for why they work are often a little shaky.


I see a lot of NLP as stuff you can layer onto already solid game for extra effect, rather than making your whole game NLP based. Things like getting her to imagine situations, evoking certain emotional states, amplifying feelings, anchoring and future pacing can all be useful concepts to experiment with, but they can take time and practice to use naturally.


Especially when you get her imagining something positive and naturally include yourself in that picture.


But IMO the foundation should still be normal social skills, attraction, tension, teasing, calibration and escalation. NLP should be an extra addition, not the entire toolbox.
 

Teevster

Tribal Elder
Tribal Elder
Joined
Aug 23, 2013
Messages
2,431
I remember that from mASF -because I had to google "powerpuff girls." @Teevster, if that was you, I salute you as the inventor!

.

Really? I also had a Powerpuff Girls hook/gambit—you refer to one as Blossom, one as Buttercup, and one as Bubbles, and then relate each girl to her respective Powerpuff equivalent, describing why.

I’m sure somebody else had a similar idea in mind; it’s pretty straightforward.

Not sure if the gambit you have is any different.

Sometimes people come up with similar ideas independently, based on similar themes.

-Teevster
 
Last edited:

Teevster

Tribal Elder
Tribal Elder
Joined
Aug 23, 2013
Messages
2,431
For example concept of holding frame and reframing was originally nlp-concept.
Not exactly. Reframing predates NLP and has roots in psychology and psychotherapy, with influences from Gregory Bateson’s work on communication and context, as well as Virginia Satir and Milton Erickson. Bandler & Grinder later incorporated these ideas into NLP.

Building rapport is obviously not an NLP inspired technique.

-Teevster
 

Teevster

Tribal Elder
Tribal Elder
Joined
Aug 23, 2013
Messages
2,431
@tornado,

It is great that you are looking to delve into technical game, but as they say, learn to run before you can walk.

My recommendation is to read up and really understand the following:
- Rapport building - and how to converse smoothly
- Frames - what they are, and their impact - if you grasp this, everything will click
- Frame-control master this and your results will skyrocket.
- Some stuff to convey values/generate attraction - like push and pull and story telling.

And then:
- Understand logistics - the concept - and how it applies to pick up and seduction.
- Learn basic escalation skills - and no, it is not "just touch her".

Get this in check first, and come back once you have mastered these. Before you do, you will NOT be able to either UNDERSTAND of PULL OFF any of the fancier stuff.

Regarding sex talk: feel free to skim them, as they can showcase how framing works - but focus on the gambits that are 1. easy to understand and pull off, and 2. that you feel comfortable with. It is also key that you understand WHY you are using them, and WHAT to expect from them - as different gambits have different purposes - such as turning her on, make her more attracted, remove resistance or build comfort.

But remember - sex talk is ultimately a framing technique. It you do not understand frames and frame control, you will have a hard time with sex talk.

-Teevster
 

Jamster

Cro-Magnon Man
Cro-Magnon Man
Joined
Mar 11, 2026
Messages
366
Sometimes people come up with similar ideas independently, based on similar themes.

All I recall is someone using the line "You're like the powerpuff girls!" I never used it - not gonna use imagery I don't understand. But I guess riffing on them would be similar for any PUA

.
 

tornado

Space Monkey
space monkey
Joined
Dec 15, 2025
Messages
61
@tornado,

It is great that you are looking to delve into technical game, but as they say, learn to run before you can walk.

My recommendation is to read up and really understand the following:
- Rapport building - and how to converse smoothly
- Frames - what they are, and their impact - if you grasp this, everything will click
- Frame-control master this and your results will skyrocket.
- Some stuff to convey values/generate attraction - like push and pull and story telling.

And then:
- Understand logistics - the concept - and how it applies to pick up and seduction.
- Learn basic escalation skills - and no, it is not "just touch her".

Get this in check first, and come back once you have mastered these. Before you do, you will NOT be able to either UNDERSTAND of PULL OFF any of the fancier stuff.

Regarding sex talk: feel free to skim them, as they can showcase how framing works - but focus on the gambits that are 1. easy to understand and pull off, and 2. that you feel comfortable with. It is also key that you understand WHY you are using them, and WHAT to expect from them - as different gambits have different purposes - such as turning her on, make her more attracted, remove resistance or build comfort.

But remember - sex talk is ultimately a framing technique. It you do not understand frames and frame control, you will have a hard time with sex talk.

-Teevster
Thank you for the advice. Too much to learn. Even though I have a basic knowledge of what frames are etc, it feels overwhelming applying all this infield live. I am thinking of buying a course that will teach all the theory and also leans more towards the practical and instantly applicable course for daygame specifically. Right now Gunwitch's smma and one date are at same price. I don't know which one to buy. Considering that I am not a complete beginner and know some theory, What would you recommend?
 

Francis

Cro-Magnon Man
Cro-Magnon Man
Joined
Mar 27, 2023
Messages
2,417
@West_Indian_Archie has mentioned a similar Destiny's Child gambit.

I was going to post that maybe you could adapt it to a modern group like New Jeans.

I googled them and one of the first hits was a music video with them as... get this... The Powerpuff Girls.

 

Teevster

Tribal Elder
Tribal Elder
Joined
Aug 23, 2013
Messages
2,431
Thank you for the advice. Too much to learn. Even though I have a basic knowledge of what frames are etc, it feels overwhelming applying all this infield live. I am thinking of buying a course that will teach all the theory and also leans more towards the practical and instantly applicable course for daygame specifically. Right now Gunwitch's smma and one date are at same price. I don't know which one to buy. Considering that I am not a complete beginner and know some theory, What would you recommend?

They are two very different products. One date is more beginner friendly, and discusses mostly conversations and general dating advice - made as beginner-friendly as possible. SMMA is more technical, built on a more heavy theoretical backbone, and designed for more intermediate/advanced guys as it does require some background knowledge.

Try to see if you can get your hands on Real World Seduction 2.0 - I think Swinggcat sells it for 1 USD.
Edit: I found one of his sites that sold it for 7 USD.
 

TimeMachineDAD

Tool-Bearing Hominid
Tool-Bearing Hominid
Joined
Jun 4, 2026
Messages
95
Not exactly. Reframing predates NLP and has roots in psychology and psychotherapy, with influences from Gregory Bateson’s work on communication and context, as well as Virginia Satir and Milton Erickson. Bandler & Grinder later incorporated these ideas into NLP.

Building rapport is obviously not an NLP inspired technique.

-Teevster
Yep, as mentioned bandler & grinder borrowed things all over the board. I am sure that 99,99% of these concepts have been understood in some sense for at least few, if not tens of thousands of years by influential leaders, clergy etc.

But my understanding from back the day is that it was basically ross jeffries's speed seduction brought NLP.into seduction community do "I am the prize" frame and frame control originated from their "NLP-roots".
Yep I know this is 100% useless nitpicking.:ROFLMAO:
 
Top