Re: Would you rather sex with girl who was fully clothed, or basketball and she
Ahhh, Neal, ... if answering you wasn't so much fun, I'd never do it...

... cuz u won't listen anyway!
NealIRC said:
Not as much as with cleavage.
You're going to have to back that up. As far as I can tell, modern clothing does not conceal most important biological information.
For instance, genetic quality can be judged based on fluctuating asymmetry (FA). High FA is associated with poor gene conservation. FA is quite readily apparent from facial features, which, unless your chick is in a burqa, or a ski mask, are not concealed by clothes.
Female sexual maturity and fertility can be judged mainly from the overall level and pattern of fat deposition, primarily to the butt and breasts, as well as hip width. Hip to waist ratio is an important marker for fertility and overall health. Modern clothing in most cases doesn't materially prevent assessing the level of fat deposition nor hip/waist ratios.
NealIRC said:
...which is why, if you've noticed, this site would tend to discourage ending an encounter with some sexual escalation but without vaginal intercourse. There is a
fundamental difference in a girl's mind between a guy who has had vaginal intercourse with her versus one who hasn't.
It's also worth noting that at least the physical sensations associated with impregnating a girl are somewhat emulated in oral sex, which is more than can be said of watching her play basketball topless.
NealIRC said:
But a woman can get pregnant with clothes on.
I hope you appreciate the significance of that fact to the present topic.
NealIRC said:
It's possible for me to want to hire a girl as a model, and not get her pregnant. $$$.
If your ancestors had been satisfied with hiring girls as models instead of shagging them, you wouldn't be here.
NealIRC said:
ThePhoenix said:
- Would masturbating to pornography tend to create a mental association between pleasure and actually having sexual intercourse, or between pleasure and passively observing sex/nudity?
All of the above.
But logically, which of those associations would you expect to be
much stronger? The association with what you're
actually doing (passive observation of sex), or the association with you hypothetically doing what some other person on the computer screen is doing?
NealIRC said:
ThePhoenix said:
- Based on your answers to (5) and (6), do you think masturbating to pornography is healthy?
If you haven't ejaculated in a while, absolutely.
See the emphasis I've added to my question.
There may be some health benefits to
ejaculating, - or more specifically, there may be health detriments to
not ejaculating, - but these are independent of watching porn. So, given that you can gain any possible health benefits of periodic ejaculation by masturbating
without porn, how do you justify your answer?
NealIRC said:
Because I'd rather kiss her snatch, than for her to kiss or suck mine.
SMH. For one, this doesn't answer the question. The question was:
ThePhoenix said:
- How do you know that you wouldn't find it exciting or enjoyable to have some fully-clothed, beautiful hot Latina* sucking your dick or fucking you? Is this an experience you've had and didn't enjoy?
I ask you, "how do you know you would prefer A over B", and you answer me, "because I would prefer C over D", and there isn't any clear equivalence A = C or B = D. It's like me asking you what time it is and you answering by giving me directions to the library.
You also completely evaded the second part of the question, which is crucial:
ThePhoenix said:
Is this an experience you've had and didn't enjoy?
And on top of this, your non-answer begs another obvious question: how do you
know you would rather kiss her snatch over her kissing or sucking yours? Have you kissed a girl's snatch? Have you had a girl suck you off?
Without having actually
had these experiences, your expression of what you
think you would prefer is essentially meaningless. You are not comparing actual acts. You are comparing your virginal ideations of these acts.
Look man, for the benefit of science. Go and fuck a hot Latina with her clothes mostly on. Pay her if you have to, cuz this is getting ridiculous. (But I didn't tell you to do that!) And then get another hot Latina to play basketball topless... I'm sure you can find escorts happy to play basketball topless for the right price. And then come back here and tell me, "Phoenix, I've fucked a hot chick with her clothes on and I've watched a hot chick play topless basketball, and I'll take topless basketball over sex any day", and I'll believe you.
NealIRC said:
Yea, it's not about the word, but about the description.
I don't know what the heck that's supposed to mean.
I do have some concept of what
aesthetic means. Per Wiktionary, emphasis mine:
Adjective
aesthetic (
comparative more aesthetic,
superlative most aesthetic)
- Concerned with beauty, artistic impact, or appearance.
- (nonstandard) Beautiful or appealing to one's sense of beauty and/or art.
Seems pretty damned....
visual to me.
To answer your question...
I'm a little problematic to your little theory. See, for starters, I'm actually
quite visual. Probably too much for my own damned good when it comes to game. I won't give a girl a second look unless she's a fair bit darker skinned than me, has a flatter, wider nose, bigger lips, kinky hair (for practical reasons I may begrudgingly let them get away with weave or relaxer), and near pure black eyes. And ideally she should be slim but curvy, have silky smooth
really dark skin, be
really tall, have high, wide cheeks, largish interpupillary distance, and perfectly symmetrical, soft, flowing Nilotic facial features, smallish nose, big lips, and have her hair in an afro or twist-out or high-side afro puff.
I am visual as fuck.
So, by your theory, I should rather watch this African beauty play basketball topless, over pounding her pussy when she's dressed. Nope. Sorry. I actually have intact breeding instincts. If she played topless basketball and then went home without letting me hit it, I'd be
thoroughly disappointed! What a damn tease.