3 Months of Coaching With Hector and Counting..

[kalyan]

It works

 

[Ree]

Apologies for not being clearer: I don't suspect a conspiracy here. The most likely untruthful version I can't rule out quite yet is that Hector himself wrote this specific post and now he's playing dumb, thinking he can fool us. Sorry Hector, I don't know you well enough to know whether or not you would be above something like that. I hope you would be, but transparency can be difficult in online businesses like this, and there are a lot of posers in this niche in particular -- so I hope you understand my insistence on the importance on verification. On another forum this would be a ridiculous request, but I think here at GC, we should hold ourselves to higher standards.

We should put to practice that old folk wisdom of "trust, but verify". If authenticity is verified, then up goes Hector's quality-assurance and honesty cred, and we can in that way help him attract more students. It's clear to me that Hector should contact Rickpage and work out a way of verification satisfactory to both parties' privacy while providing sufficient evidence to remove suspicion. Otherwise, there's always going to be this question mark.

One simple method could be for Rickpage to forward Chase key documentation of the services tendered between him and Hector while Hector was operating as an agent of GC Inc. -- like contracts, for example -- and then Chase can rubber stamp this thread as authentic or remove it if it is proven to be false.

And future testimonials could be verified in a similar way, as well, if other people so wish them to be verified -- at the very least when they come from a brand new user/account.

this is funny as fuck.....man i am laughing in the office...although it is a very comical and hilarious scenario
..i strongly doubt hector has a ghost account and is bullshitting us...

 

[Oskar]

Don't think anyone was calling you a "shady liar", Chase -- or even Anatman. Was I implying that it wasn't entirely impossible, though? Absolutely. But make no mistake: testimonials were at issue in this thread, not characters. My doggedness here is all about that. It comes from a desire to trust, but verify B2C. As I see it, a business like this relies on its credibility to support itself. And its clients, new and old, should expect direct transparency and not misdirection. How you guys handle yourselves when asked to put your money where your mouth is tells a lot about what potential clients can expect from services offered. The fact that you're willing to prove your testimonials according to the minimum standards laid out by your junior staff lends you and your brand legitimacy. I'm for one satisfied with this evidence. Basically, I don't think you're enough of a scoundrel to forge a fake receipt. Thanks for playing along!

 

[Cacc]

Oskar,

Your selflessness is truly inspiring! I'm glad we have someone like you here, securing our rights and ready to deliver justice at a moment's notice

 

[Oskar]

Oskar,

Your selflessness is truly inspiring! I'm glad we have someone like you here, securing our rights and ready to deliver justice at a moment's notice

Nothing to do with securing rights or delivering justice, really. If you're looking for justice, take it up with a judge. Outside that, we're all just doing our best to minimize compromising and as consistently as possible moving forward towards win-win scenarios.

 

[Hector Papi Castillo]