Novacane,
Novacane said:
I'd agree with this but more along the lines when it comes to high school, as there are literally thousands of people attending school/campus at any given time in regards to post-secondary. If you can elaborate on the "cool" aspect as I see relatively no way to be known as the "cool" guy, reasons being you encounter so many people to the point it's hard to even keep track of who's who. With that being said wouldn't it be better to come off as someone that can't quite be figured out, as it'd spark curiosity? Again just some thoughts i'd love to hear many opinions, and also experiences!
"Cool" as in
1)You not a social outcast
2)You're friendly
3)You're reasonably well liked
4)You have humour
5)You generally have things going on for you
In my post secondary school, that is if you ask about experiences, I got girls relatively well when i use the "loud guy" game. If you happen to read 3 personalities by Chase, i employed that (where i talk alot) and girls like me reasonably well until a friend of mine who's fundamentals are handled and he's those quiet but assertive guys. I lose out to him once he is around. Law of least effort there.
In my secondary school, unless you're cool in your class and your friends rank you highly or look up to you, it's difficult to get girls because most girl friends and most guy friends i knew at the time were having relationships outside of my class. This has also the problem of social discretion. The guy i told you that was prolific was a guy who was really handsome, dominant and basically the number 1 runner in school. His grades were also A's, and he fuck the girls in my other class and flirting with girls in my class. Everyone had no problem knowing how dominant he is.
There's a lot i can talk about the social nuances but perhaps someone better will come in. I am not so prolific or well documented when i was in school.
Zac