What's new

Am I just not recognising/understanding signs of interest, or are my fundamentals still too low?

IndolentEscapade

Rookie
Rookie
Joined
Dec 8, 2024
Messages
3
Hi guys,



I've been reading lots of articles on girlschase.com for months now, and they have been brilliant in helping me understand aspects of seduction (and also understanding how women think in general). I have certainly realised that there have been many mindsets that I had that were totally wrong, mainly as a result of other PUAs on the internet brainwashing me with information that is quite frankly wrong (such as the ones who say fundamentals don't matter at all, and that it's all entirely about your verbal flirtation skills).



Despite having gained further understanding in the social and seductive arts, and practicing my skills by approaching and talking to new women on the regular (I typically go for warm-approaches in social situations), I feel like there is one small piece of the puzzle that I am still missing which is currently hindering my seduction game entirely.



Despite the fact that I have worked on my fundamentals greatly over the past few years, and that I have been practising socialising with both men and women in a variety of different settings to an extent where I am fairly comfortable and confident with having interactions with new people, I am having great difficulty in reading signs of interest from women and differentiating if they are flirting or simply just being friendly.

The problem is, because I do not have any reliable/consistent results to form a baseline with, I end up getting in my head worrying about whether the true reason is simply because my value is too low (i.e. fundamentals are still poor), as opposed to it being attainability/auto-rejection/girls have their guard up when a stranger first talks to them.



I was really hoping that I would learn from girlschase.com that it would be far better just to disregard looking for signs of interest, especially as Chase has written about going for results and not reactions, and that mixed signals are extremely common, especially from hotter girls (the articles on ambiguity have certainly helped me understand more too). I have also personally experienced the paradox of the flirty girl scenario on a fair few occasions.



But then I get stuck again when I read articles on girlschase.com (and elsewhere) that signs of interests are indeed very helpful (though not conclusive), and that we should not be disregarding them at all.



So I am left with a dilemma – either my fundamentals are still too low and that I am simply not attractive enough to women still, or I am simply not reading the signs of interest that they are displaying.



My gut feeling is that it’s the latter, given that I have worked on my fundamentals (and still continue to do so), and I have been given positive remarks from various people. But I don’t have consistent substantial results to prove this to myself, so I can never be 100% sure. And as for signs – I seem to still be locked in this mindset that girls would make it fairly obvious to me if they are interested, yet I never seem to really get these, or I misread them being nervous and aloof as disinterest. I understand the points about investment, but I don’t even get as far as that to be able to put that to the test.

I guess one final thing that really makes it difficult for me is all the people on the internet who seem to suggest that attractive men will be approached and hit on directly - I rarely ever experience this, so I keep trying to convince myself that the internet is just presenting an extreme lens of this, and as such isn't really something that happens to most guys on the regular.



I would love it if anyone could please help shed some light on this for me, or point me to some resources that would help me figure this out.

Perhaps the best example of a situation where I find myself stuck is when I try to talk to a girl (maybe I met her once before, or she's new), and she's just being really aloof and not really helping carry the conversation on. While girlschase.com would teach that this is to be expected and it's the job of me as the man to put more effort in initially, I struggle to find the balance between putting in effort, but not coming across as too needy, desperate or outcome dependent - I often find I need the girl to at least chip in a few times to help to help her along. In this scenario, I often just write these girls off as disinterested, but is this an accurate interpretation or could I be wrong? (e.g. attainability/auto-rejection?)

Many thanks,

ITS
 

KJ Francis

Cro-Magnon Man
Cro-Magnon Man
Joined
Mar 27, 2023
Messages
1,001
reading signs of interest from women and differentiating if they are flirting or simply just being friendly.

when I read the above I immediately thought of what you wrote soon after (results not reactions):
going for results and not reactions
attractive men will be approached and hit on directly - I rarely ever experience this, so I keep trying to convince myself that the internet is just presenting an extreme lens of this
yes this is very rare
I often find I need the girl to at least chip in a few times to help to help her along. In this scenario, I often just write these girls off as disinterested
what I didn't read anywhere is anything to do with asking for compliance or moving things forward in any way.

I see you do warm approaches in social situations (so there is a friendly platonic frame already). are you breaking the touch barrier or showing sexual interest or non-platonic intent in any way? are you asking girls out on dates?
Despite the fact that I have worked on my fundamentals greatly over the past few years
if you have good fundamentals and are operating in friendly social circles, girls might think you are just being friendly yourself and could be having the exact same thoughts you are toward them - wondering if you are interested. so you may need to increase your attainability by showing more interest.

the only way to know is move things forward and see if she follows your lead.
 

theReason

Space Monkey
space monkey
Joined
May 27, 2024
Messages
130
@itservicesx

Please read every sentence of KJ Francis’s reply very closely.

Have you ever memorized a bible verse?

Memorize the following passages:

you do warm approaches in social situations (so there is a friendly platonic frame already). are you breaking the touch barrier or showing sexual interest or non-platonic intent in any way? are you asking girls out on dates?

girls might think you are just being friendly yourself and
having the exact same thoughts you are toward them - wondering if you are interested. so you may need to increase your attainability by showing more interest.

the only way to know is move things forward and see if she follows your lead.

Also, yes. Being approached by a girl is extremely rare. Don’t get brainwashed.
 

Skills

Tribal Elder
Tribal Elder
Joined
Nov 11, 2019
Messages
5,580
I would lower based on this gen the reliance on it vs previous years... Even if your fundies are great, use it as a bonus but I would drop the reliance on it...i stop trying to figure out the why, but again the last few years ais and the reliance and accuracy vs previous years have gone too shit...
 

Chase

Chieftan
Staff member
tribal-elder
Joined
Oct 9, 2012
Messages
6,356
@itservicesx,

Welcome to the Boards!

If you never notice women doing these, your observation skills need work:

  • Playing with their hair
  • Glancing casually but curiously around
  • Making eye contact extra long and holding it
  • Straightening up and arching their backs, pushing their breasts forward
  • Hovering around you or other men without any good reason for being there

You should at the very least be able to notice women doing this around other men when you go out, if not yourself.

If you're not seeing at all, ever, or only rarely (women do this stuff fairly a lot, especially in social-interactive situations), you're not attuned enough to female nonverbal communication.

Like @theReason, I will also stress this note from @KJ Francis:

I see you do warm approaches in social situations (so there is a friendly platonic frame already). are you breaking the touch barrier or showing sexual interest or non-platonic intent in any way? are you asking girls out on dates?

You can think of your ability to notice and interpret women's signals as a kind of "detector."

The way you train this detector is by feeding it both signal and results information.

e.g., "girl showed this signal and this one, then was this willing to comply + agreed to date" or " this girl displayed these three signals but refused compliance and turned down date request."

Most guys are able to recognize women's signals, but they lack enough results data to interpret them correctly. Instead they get overly excited about spotting signals, and think the signals mean more than they do.

That's a bit different from your problem -- not recognizing them in the first place.

As an alternate route to recognizing signals, if you just start going for touch, compliance, taking the lead, and asking girls out, you should start to intuitively pick up on signals as you gain experience with compliant women.

The brain is very good at figuring out, "Ooh, she is doing that thing we have seen women do dozens of times before right before they became ultra compliant"; much of the best stuff you will learn about signals you learn this way, from tying results back to reactions.

Chase
 

Skills

Tribal Elder
Tribal Elder
Joined
Nov 11, 2019
Messages
5,580
op.- for info. on that you can watch this video, but as chase is saying it will take time, and with this gen, i would no put a lot emphasis on it....

 
the right date makes getting her back home a piece of cake

IndolentEscapade

Rookie
Rookie
Joined
Dec 8, 2024
Messages
3
@Skills can you elaborate what you mean by 'this gen' and the stuff you're talking about with it?

I'm assuming you're saying that this modern generation of women don't put as much store on fundamentals anymore, and that you're implying it's all about taking swift action for 'dtf' women... - have I understood that correctly? Because this slightly goes against what I've been leaning from girlschase.com and elsewhere...

Anyway - thanks to everyone for your responses. I think @KJ Francis is spot on the mark - I guess I just don't necessarily believe it all myself yet. The more I study seduction and game, the more I realise that there's a mismatch in my perceived experience vs actual experience.

A large number of guys that I know who are confident, have great fundamentals and are successful with women, are so because they initially had bits of success with women by chance (e.g. drunken) when they were younger, and used that as a catalyst to further improve their fundamentals and general confidence in themselves over time. As such, they went from starting out with nothing, to then having 1 or 2 results which sparked their motivation to improve themselves, and then over time their results increase to match their increasing value over time in a positive correlation.

For me, this has not been the case. I started off with nothing, but then made lots of efforts over the past few years (even before I started reading material online) to increase my value, practice my social skills, improve my look, physique and fashion, and just in general become a far better option than I ever used to be. However, I did all this without having initial bits of success with women early on.

As such, I feel I am at a stage now where mentally I am still pedestalising the concept of sex and relationships (not individual women, but the general idea of them), and still see them as a big deal and challenge that I have to overcome with high expectation. Whereas, when I interact with men and women in social settings, often my abilities are far superior to that of the average person in my groups, and that it is then assumed by others that I surely must know exactly what I'm doing, and would have no problem in making my interest known to a particular girl and leading her through all the way to compliance, dates and sex.

And to compound all this, I find people therefore expect more from me and are less forgiving when I don't know how to navigate a particular social situation, which doesn't help me at all when my own view on myself is that I'm far less able and experienced than everyone else thinks I am.

I wonder if anyone here has had personal experience similar to mine, or know of people who have?

Finally @Chase , thanks for re-emphasising that to me - I totally agree in that I need to improve my observation skills. I actually think I'm perfectly capable at recognising signs, but it's the fact that I get scared that I have over-estimated a signal, which causes me to dismiss most things I see to such an extent where I don't even consciously recognise them anymore. It's almost like I need something obvious to validate myself (which, I know, is a wrong mentality to have, and I am working on trying to undo this). I have noticed that older women tend to me more direct towards me - maybe because they are more desperate given their age compared to women say in their early 20s?

I will continue to try looking out for signs, even towards other guys, just when I'm out in general to try and gauge for myself with what's going on.

Thanks all

BW, ITS
 

Skills

Tribal Elder
Tribal Elder
Joined
Nov 11, 2019
Messages
5,580
@Skills can you elaborate what you mean by 'this gen' and the stuff you're talking about with it?

I'm assuming you're saying that this modern generation of women don't put as much store on fundamentals anymore, and that you're implying it's all about taking swift action for 'dtf' women... - have I understood that correctly? Because this slightly goes against what I've been leaning from girlschase.com and elsewhere..
No... Fundamentals always matter pre gen z..you could force and predict like a prophet reactions and drfness with really good accuracy... Watch the video i posted for context... really good video.. that reliance with gen z is unreliable ,don't ask me why, I stop trying to figure it out post corona genz...

You can approach a girl not giving you anything at all and is on...my point...
 

theReason

Space Monkey
space monkey
Joined
May 27, 2024
Messages
130
And to compound all this, I find people therefore expect more from me and are less forgiving when I don't know how to navigate a particular social situation, which doesn't help me at all when my own view on myself is that I'm far less able and experienced than everyone else thinks I am.

I wonder if anyone here has had personal experience similar to mine, or know of people who have?
Yeah, me.

I know that feeling of girls and guys giving you no slack on your social skills because you look so good that they can’t make sense of it.

The vibe is “You’re TOO HOT to be THIS BAD at socializing/bad at game; there must be something SERIOUSLY WRONG WITH YOU.”

I know that feel.

The flip-side of that (which I am just now starting to use to my advantage) is that girls open up EXTREMELY EARLY ESCALATION WINDOWS to test guys like you and me.

Like, if you focus on detecting those windows (and seriously, I mean they come Freaky Fast like Jimmy John’s), then once your results start coming in, they will all be “fast seductions”.

“Anal in the park”-style.

I guess the other best advice I can give you is to actually do some digging on how to run a relationship.

That also comes way too soon after this stage.

We grow up so fast…


I have noticed that older women tend to me more direct towards me - maybe because they are more desperate given their age compared to women say in their early 20s?
I am actually trying to specialize in older women.

Old woman + Lucky approach logistics + Moving fast = Free Pussy, and I like free pussy. Muy bueno.
 
Top