- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 714
Alright.
So I'm in this religious youth group where I'm co-president of it (to try to increase my leadership capabilities). We had an important event today that would probably make us the most money out of any event that we do all year.
At this event, my youth group was split in two. On the one side is these kids who seem cooler, but slack off all the time then complain when a fellow member tells them off. The other group is me and some good friends of mine who are hard working but still have fun. We're more on the side of loud and funny, while they are cool, quiet, and slackers. As for the other co-president, she's not on a side.
Now I have these two groups where a schism has formed between them. On one hand, I like the split, even though there are people I can talk to on the other side, me and my friend trade off as social group leaders who can make the group laugh or do whatever we want with. However, I feel putting these groups together would be the more socially calibrated option. Problem is, the leaders of the other group are more charismatic than I am, so there's no way I'd be able to lead them, especially since they don't like to work hard and are different from the people in my group.
So question is: how do I proceed with this situation? Leave it as is and continue to lead when need be but leave the other group alone for the most part, or try and take control of both groups?
Jake.
So I'm in this religious youth group where I'm co-president of it (to try to increase my leadership capabilities). We had an important event today that would probably make us the most money out of any event that we do all year.
At this event, my youth group was split in two. On the one side is these kids who seem cooler, but slack off all the time then complain when a fellow member tells them off. The other group is me and some good friends of mine who are hard working but still have fun. We're more on the side of loud and funny, while they are cool, quiet, and slackers. As for the other co-president, she's not on a side.
Now I have these two groups where a schism has formed between them. On one hand, I like the split, even though there are people I can talk to on the other side, me and my friend trade off as social group leaders who can make the group laugh or do whatever we want with. However, I feel putting these groups together would be the more socially calibrated option. Problem is, the leaders of the other group are more charismatic than I am, so there's no way I'd be able to lead them, especially since they don't like to work hard and are different from the people in my group.
So question is: how do I proceed with this situation? Leave it as is and continue to lead when need be but leave the other group alone for the most part, or try and take control of both groups?
Jake.