- Joined
- Jul 20, 2015
- Messages
- 1,532
I've been working on building high quality connections with girls. I'm trying to put together another piece of the puzzle and need your help in connecting some ideas from Chase and Hector. I'm pretty sure that compliance suggestions can help you build a connection with a girl.
Recently, Chase had an article that described the effect of group herding mindsets on dating and seduction. In it, he describes a couple mentality, which I paraphrase below:
Interesting, so how does asking for compliance hook a girl into a couple mindset with you, and change her thinking from "individual thinking" to "couple thinking?"
In Hector's article on whether you should command, suggest, or request a girl for compliance, he mentions this (the bolded part is the important part):
So when you use a compliance suggestion, youre letting her have input, which is a normal occurrence in a couple mentality.
Here's another excerpt:
He doesn't say why it decreases attainability. But in Axiom 5, if attainability is raised because you let her have input, then commands must decrease attainability because you're not letting her have input, which means you're not really a group.
Hector also says that the more a girl likes you, the more dominant you can be with getting compliance. Because, if she already likes you and is hooked, she's probably already in a couple mentality with you, and you can afford to take a little attainability hit in return for some dominance points. She'll still view herself as in a couple with you.
Compliance suggestions usually use the word "we." Here's what Chase has to say about using the word "we" in his ebook:
SOOOO? Are compliance suggestions useful for helping you get into a couple mentality with a girl? Help me put these ideas together!
Recently, Chase had an article that described the effect of group herding mindsets on dating and seduction. In it, he describes a couple mentality, which I paraphrase below:
A couple is two people who brains are more or less synced up (a collective consciousness). This involves romantic couplings. If you talk to an individual girl at the grocery store, and she laughs and the two of you vibe well and you reach the hook point and decide to start moving around together, you and her become, at least temporarily, a couple.
Couples are more significantly closed off to the outside world than individuals are. They are more focused on each other and less sensitive to outsiders. Couples are more focused on what is good for the couple than they are what is good for the individual. They do this because both parties have decided that sustaining/continuing with this coupling is in their interests.
When you absorb a girl into a couple, her thinking changes. It shifts from "individual thinking" to "couple thinking." Most of socializing and courtship centers around getting people to the point where they view you and them as part of the same group.
Interesting, so how does asking for compliance hook a girl into a couple mindset with you, and change her thinking from "individual thinking" to "couple thinking?"
In Hector's article on whether you should command, suggest, or request a girl for compliance, he mentions this (the bolded part is the important part):
Dominance Axiom 5: successful suggestions moderately increase value and attainability.
You don’t net a greater overall dominance from a successful suggestion, but you do get attainability out of it because you suggested it, thereby letting her give input as opposed to a yes/no response.
So when you use a compliance suggestion, youre letting her have input, which is a normal occurrence in a couple mentality.
Here's another excerpt:
Dominance Axiom 2: successful compliance commands greatly increase value and greatly decrease attainability.
He doesn't say why it decreases attainability. But in Axiom 5, if attainability is raised because you let her have input, then commands must decrease attainability because you're not letting her have input, which means you're not really a group.
Hector also says that the more a girl likes you, the more dominant you can be with getting compliance. Because, if she already likes you and is hooked, she's probably already in a couple mentality with you, and you can afford to take a little attainability hit in return for some dominance points. She'll still view herself as in a couple with you.
Compliance suggestions usually use the word "we." Here's what Chase has to say about using the word "we" in his ebook:
“We” is a powerful word in its own right. You don’t want to use it too early into an interaction (unless you use it just right) – do so and you risk coming across as though you’re trying to force a connection. But once the two of you have established a certain level of relation to each other, begin using “we” as much as you can without overdoing it. If she starts thinking of you and her as “us”, she starts to unconsciously picture the two of you increasingly as a pair, and things between the two of you will move forward more quickly and naturally without much hesitation or many second thoughts
SOOOO? Are compliance suggestions useful for helping you get into a couple mentality with a girl? Help me put these ideas together!