Hey everyone,
Like many of us, I've been an avid reader of this site for awhile, and my success with women has gone from nonexistent to a level I never thought possible.
On top of that, I've taken a massive interest in social psychology (changed my major to it). While it won't be my career, it will remain a fascination of mine for years to come (I mean, every day I live is a live action field test).
This isn't a conventional success story or lay report though, I wanted to let everyone in on some amusing/ironic/satisfying news.
Currently I am an undergrad senior at Yale, in the USA, and I decided to conduct an experiment with high risk/recklessness but revealing results.
I took the psychology department's "Attraction and Relationships" course.
The class grade was based on:
-3 Exams on lecture and textbook material
-2 Papers
Now for the experiment: I did not attend class once. I did not listen to any lectures, or receive notes from classmates. I only attended class meetings when there was an exam. Papers were turned in online. Basically, my grade would entirely depend on background knowledge.
My final grade was an A- for the semester.
This thread is not meant to embarrass my school, make this particular class seem like a joke, or act as a self-brag. Quite the contrary, the exams and papers were challenging and required thorough knowledge. They covered material from scientific papers, research studies, and highly grounded and reputed science. During exams, I intuited answers from my knowledge gathered from countless hours of reading GC articles, and, whadya know, that knowledge turns out to be completely in line with the academic world.
The point of this thread is that GC is real, people. I know most of us know that, but it's painful see doubters both online and in real life. When I talk to my buddies and give them relationship advice, a lot of them refuse to believe the concepts I am discussing. Yet, if they only went out and tried them in the field, they would see how true they are. Well here we are, for the non-field testers, here is some pretty solid non-field content certification.
To those that may say I was a reckless idiot, I would not have done this if I wasn't sure of GC's accuracy already.
So thank you Chase, and all the writers at GC. Keep doing what you're doing, I hope more men (and even women) can benefit from this website and community. It's a big cliche to say this, but my lifestlye and perspective on people have totally changed for the better.
Like many of us, I've been an avid reader of this site for awhile, and my success with women has gone from nonexistent to a level I never thought possible.
On top of that, I've taken a massive interest in social psychology (changed my major to it). While it won't be my career, it will remain a fascination of mine for years to come (I mean, every day I live is a live action field test).
This isn't a conventional success story or lay report though, I wanted to let everyone in on some amusing/ironic/satisfying news.
Currently I am an undergrad senior at Yale, in the USA, and I decided to conduct an experiment with high risk/recklessness but revealing results.
I took the psychology department's "Attraction and Relationships" course.
The class grade was based on:
-3 Exams on lecture and textbook material
-2 Papers
Now for the experiment: I did not attend class once. I did not listen to any lectures, or receive notes from classmates. I only attended class meetings when there was an exam. Papers were turned in online. Basically, my grade would entirely depend on background knowledge.
My final grade was an A- for the semester.
This thread is not meant to embarrass my school, make this particular class seem like a joke, or act as a self-brag. Quite the contrary, the exams and papers were challenging and required thorough knowledge. They covered material from scientific papers, research studies, and highly grounded and reputed science. During exams, I intuited answers from my knowledge gathered from countless hours of reading GC articles, and, whadya know, that knowledge turns out to be completely in line with the academic world.
The point of this thread is that GC is real, people. I know most of us know that, but it's painful see doubters both online and in real life. When I talk to my buddies and give them relationship advice, a lot of them refuse to believe the concepts I am discussing. Yet, if they only went out and tried them in the field, they would see how true they are. Well here we are, for the non-field testers, here is some pretty solid non-field content certification.
To those that may say I was a reckless idiot, I would not have done this if I wasn't sure of GC's accuracy already.
So thank you Chase, and all the writers at GC. Keep doing what you're doing, I hope more men (and even women) can benefit from this website and community. It's a big cliche to say this, but my lifestlye and perspective on people have totally changed for the better.
