I just read chase's article on womens' morality, here: https://www.girlschase.com/content/beauty-greatness-and-goodness-female-moral-nature
This is a relevant and important topic for me because my specific goal for learning seduction is to have a woman who is viciously devoted to me.
He emphasizes very aggressively throughout the read that women are only able to stay devoted to you if you are willing and able to provide them with children. This is a problem for me because quite literally, my balls are not connected to my prostate. So I can't get any girl pregnant no matter what. I won't get into how this was discovered so moving on...
So let's assume for the sake of argument that I otherwise fully embody both the attractive "alpha traits" and the attractive "beta traits" simultaneously, being the kind of man that my type of girl crawls over glass to be with. Is being mindblowingly attractive enough to overcome this limitation on its own within the context of my goal?
But with the arguments that chase made in the article, it seems that failing to fulfill the 'biological clock' instinct would be percieved as failing to uphold my end of the relationship.
In that case I'd assume I need to keep her need fulfilled by redirecting it towards myself (thus satisfying the social contract), but I don't know how to do that without causing her to lose attraction for me because my understanding is that women cannot be sexually attracted to someone that they also feel motivated to protect or mother.
This is a relevant and important topic for me because my specific goal for learning seduction is to have a woman who is viciously devoted to me.
He emphasizes very aggressively throughout the read that women are only able to stay devoted to you if you are willing and able to provide them with children. This is a problem for me because quite literally, my balls are not connected to my prostate. So I can't get any girl pregnant no matter what. I won't get into how this was discovered so moving on...
So let's assume for the sake of argument that I otherwise fully embody both the attractive "alpha traits" and the attractive "beta traits" simultaneously, being the kind of man that my type of girl crawls over glass to be with. Is being mindblowingly attractive enough to overcome this limitation on its own within the context of my goal?
But with the arguments that chase made in the article, it seems that failing to fulfill the 'biological clock' instinct would be percieved as failing to uphold my end of the relationship.
In that case I'd assume I need to keep her need fulfilled by redirecting it towards myself (thus satisfying the social contract), but I don't know how to do that without causing her to lose attraction for me because my understanding is that women cannot be sexually attracted to someone that they also feel motivated to protect or mother.
Last edited: