- Joined
- Feb 23, 2022
- Messages
- 998
So, recently in this thread here (https://www.skilledseducer.com/threads/question-about-low-key-gaming-styles.26073/#post-147518) where I was inquiring into low key styles of game, I can to the realization that a lot of my mixed results may be coming from mixing styles of game in incongruous ways. There is still a lot I need to field test to get clearer on whether this is the case for me, but my new goal is the get more solid on coming from a baseline style of game that is congruent with my mood at the moment, then build from there. This has lead me to some questions I am having on the subject of mixing and matching styles of game I am curious what you playboys have to say on the matter.
First off, fundamentals are king. They are the underlying foundation of all game styles and the bridge between them as well. Let's just start by highlighting this.
Now, from there it seems to me that style is really about presenting oneself and operating in a way that is congruent with your personality. That's why each style works great for some players, and not so great for others. Some styles are going to be more closely related to each other than others, while some are more distant. Though all are related. Almost like a color wheel of sorts. It's all color, but man can a painting sure look like shit with the wrong color combo Many techniques can be applied to many styles, though some techniques may sit better with some styles more than others. Now for some questions
- Are there ways of mixing and matching styles that can be productive and get solid results?
-Can you use techniques from very disparate styles as kind of wild card maneuvers?
-Are there ways that pulling from disparate styles during a set (both continuously or unconsciously) can really fuck you?
-Do you think it is better to develop one style of game and just stick with that? How much experimentation is helpful, and when does it start to get in your way?
-Is this line of thinking just masturbatory and not really productive for refining one's game. Are there better ways to think about the whole thing?
I am beginning to think that maybe it is best to develop to the max a style or two that are closely related, as a baseline. And maybe have a few wild card techniques for versatility's sake. That said, I think that, since being congruent is so key to the seduction process, pulling from a style that doesn't suit your mood or the current scenario can really fuck you. Just cause a style works for you in one mood doesn't mean it will suit you well in another. The same being true for venues, and women. How do you use your style to match your personality, mood, venue, and the women you are connecting with? ultimately I'd say this thread is an inquiry into consistency in style and game. Any thoughts, gentlemen?
note: edited to simplify the line of questioning and narrow the scope of this post
First off, fundamentals are king. They are the underlying foundation of all game styles and the bridge between them as well. Let's just start by highlighting this.
Now, from there it seems to me that style is really about presenting oneself and operating in a way that is congruent with your personality. That's why each style works great for some players, and not so great for others. Some styles are going to be more closely related to each other than others, while some are more distant. Though all are related. Almost like a color wheel of sorts. It's all color, but man can a painting sure look like shit with the wrong color combo Many techniques can be applied to many styles, though some techniques may sit better with some styles more than others. Now for some questions
- Are there ways of mixing and matching styles that can be productive and get solid results?
-Can you use techniques from very disparate styles as kind of wild card maneuvers?
-Are there ways that pulling from disparate styles during a set (both continuously or unconsciously) can really fuck you?
-Do you think it is better to develop one style of game and just stick with that? How much experimentation is helpful, and when does it start to get in your way?
-Is this line of thinking just masturbatory and not really productive for refining one's game. Are there better ways to think about the whole thing?
I am beginning to think that maybe it is best to develop to the max a style or two that are closely related, as a baseline. And maybe have a few wild card techniques for versatility's sake. That said, I think that, since being congruent is so key to the seduction process, pulling from a style that doesn't suit your mood or the current scenario can really fuck you. Just cause a style works for you in one mood doesn't mean it will suit you well in another. The same being true for venues, and women. How do you use your style to match your personality, mood, venue, and the women you are connecting with? ultimately I'd say this thread is an inquiry into consistency in style and game. Any thoughts, gentlemen?
note: edited to simplify the line of questioning and narrow the scope of this post
Last edited:
