- Joined
- Nov 20, 2012
- Messages
- 6,551
I probably write my last post.
This is an obvious romanticism.
i expect myself to lie.
but when i hear that casual sex is wrong, i am triggered.
They never say it is wrong, but they imply it and claim the problems it cause, while they are gay/serve themselves.
i dislike Jordan Peterson. Occasionally, i dislike Chase when he write certain articles. It's not so much that i think they are false. It's more of like, you have reach where you,
as a result of who you were.
or the ignorance of who you were,
or the ignorance of other variables involve,
or denial of
but ultimately, it's the 'you sitting on the throne' versus them they are advising who is 'not on the throne'.
This is my problem with Jordan Peterson. That basedline. Jordan Peterson's basedline is a basis of who he is, rather what it actually is.
So yea, even if Zac were to be as honest as possible, and the basedline he points out is the ones that is mostly accepted: that is, murder = jail. This is an example. The thing is everyone don't see it. You all
see it from your point of view.
Thus you think that it is my perspective. Yes, you are perceiving me. It is my perspective because you perceiving me, but the variables is the same thing, that is, murder = jail. This is an example.
i'm sorry to
Jordan Peterson or those who sit on the throne/older people who seems enlightened when they not/guys who are good with girls.
You are not "truth"/nothingness. (See what i did there, sitting on my throne)
Zac
This is an obvious romanticism.
i expect myself to lie.
but when i hear that casual sex is wrong, i am triggered.
They never say it is wrong, but they imply it and claim the problems it cause, while they are gay/serve themselves.
i dislike Jordan Peterson. Occasionally, i dislike Chase when he write certain articles. It's not so much that i think they are false. It's more of like, you have reach where you,
as a result of who you were.
or the ignorance of who you were,
or the ignorance of other variables involve,
or denial of
but ultimately, it's the 'you sitting on the throne' versus them they are advising who is 'not on the throne'.
This is my problem with Jordan Peterson. That basedline. Jordan Peterson's basedline is a basis of who he is, rather what it actually is.
So yea, even if Zac were to be as honest as possible, and the basedline he points out is the ones that is mostly accepted: that is, murder = jail. This is an example. The thing is everyone don't see it. You all
see it from your point of view.
Thus you think that it is my perspective. Yes, you are perceiving me. It is my perspective because you perceiving me, but the variables is the same thing, that is, murder = jail. This is an example.
i'm sorry to
Jordan Peterson or those who sit on the throne/older people who seems enlightened when they not/guys who are good with girls.
You are not "truth"/nothingness. (See what i did there, sitting on my throne)
Zac
