- Joined
- Jan 26, 2013
- Messages
- 707
So ever since I started reading GC and got a grasp on investment I started to severely limit my texting to everyone in general. I disabled all notifications on my phone, so I genuinely just look at my phone when I feel like it. This gives a very natural response time and I'm not hostage of people messaging me and deliberately waiting to get back to them.
The only exception to this rule is when I'm texting a girl I'd like to fuck. Then I deliberately wait a little bit more to respond her every once in a while (sometimes hours). But the thing is: even if I set the right precedent -- "look, I'm not much of an texting guy, and you're feel free to hit me up when you feel like it; but please understand if I don't get to you right away. In fact, I only use text to arrange meetings, 'cause I prefer talking face-to-face. We should do that, by the way." -- I feel like I'm punishing the girl for her investment (texting, wanting to talk to me, etc) in me.
But I found that doing this has two problems, essentially: if the girl is OK with it, she rarely will be the first to hit me up again so I'll be the one initiating a conversation 90% of the time; if she's not, then she goes cold.
I've had girls go cold because they think "I just want to 'meet' (i.e. go out and fuck even if I suggest going for something like coffee) them" or that I don't care about them enough to have a conversation even when I explicitly said I'd love to do it face-to-face, which in my book is even better. I even had one girl tell me "whoa, sorry, I didn't know you were so busy" (we were in the middle of a text chat when I communicated that).
So I set bad precedents either way. If I text I'm setting the precedent that I like to text and if I don't, then I'll be the one initiating the conversation most of the time. And even I do it every couple of days to make sure she's not stepping in auto-rejection as I always feel like I punished her for texting and be interested in me.
How to deal with this?
The only exception to this rule is when I'm texting a girl I'd like to fuck. Then I deliberately wait a little bit more to respond her every once in a while (sometimes hours). But the thing is: even if I set the right precedent -- "look, I'm not much of an texting guy, and you're feel free to hit me up when you feel like it; but please understand if I don't get to you right away. In fact, I only use text to arrange meetings, 'cause I prefer talking face-to-face. We should do that, by the way." -- I feel like I'm punishing the girl for her investment (texting, wanting to talk to me, etc) in me.
But I found that doing this has two problems, essentially: if the girl is OK with it, she rarely will be the first to hit me up again so I'll be the one initiating a conversation 90% of the time; if she's not, then she goes cold.
I've had girls go cold because they think "I just want to 'meet' (i.e. go out and fuck even if I suggest going for something like coffee) them" or that I don't care about them enough to have a conversation even when I explicitly said I'd love to do it face-to-face, which in my book is even better. I even had one girl tell me "whoa, sorry, I didn't know you were so busy" (we were in the middle of a text chat when I communicated that).
So I set bad precedents either way. If I text I'm setting the precedent that I like to text and if I don't, then I'll be the one initiating the conversation most of the time. And even I do it every couple of days to make sure she's not stepping in auto-rejection as I always feel like I punished her for texting and be interested in me.
How to deal with this?

