So in the email newsletter, Chase included a link to a $70 program called Pandora's Box. I don't know if it's out of line to post the link but here it is:
http://3simplequestions.com/adpre/?afid ... 8eca&SID;=
If that doesn't work, then just type in www.3simplequestions.com.
Supposedly, the egregiously long sales-pitch claims that, among other things, you can make women instantly horny for you by just asking three questions.
Here's what makes this seem off to me:
Easiness: being great at anything takes time. Maybe there are some things out there that can improved with a simple fix but to instantly sleep with countless sexy women after buying a seventy dollar program on the internet is outlandish at best. At the very least, a fair amount of time will be required and the narrator goes into no effort to explain the difficulties which a person may encounter.
The sensationalism: The narrator uses a fair amount of language like "hot, wet pussy that fits like a glove", or "rock star" to get you enticed as well as drawings of an out-of-shape man having sex with gorgeous women.
Cherry-picked testimony: Including a few emails about how the system works great does not mean that there aren't a thousand that attest to its deficiencies.
Time-limit pressure: Apparently, only a hundred people will be able to purchase this program before it "disappears forever" because it's part of a "test group". How much do you want to bet that this website will still be up a month from now or another website will take its place with the same material?
Word Vomit: The narrator tries to drown your sense of reason or ability to think critically by the sheer volume of the introductory audio file. By talking down your resistance, he can overcome it without having provided any logical reason why we should invest in his product.
Affiliation: The narrator is apparently not even the person who developed the program! After the "main" audio file ends, he barrages you with questions that you might have including a hilarious "Can I trust this product?" for which he provides no support except by overemphasizing the premise "Yes, you can definitely trust this product" or by circular reasoning: "Vin says that you can trust this product because it works. You can trust this product because Vin says it works"
Support: The most glaring issue. If this product really works as well as it claims, then why not give a little bit of it away (much like GirlsChase does) to convince people that it does? We would have an idea of what is actually being talked about and we could try it for ourselves. Free samples are invaluable. Simply including testimony is not trustworthy enough. If I included testimony that "Tom Gray's Patented Unicorn Powder" really worked, that is still not reason to believe me. If I'm selling a seventy dollar product that "works like gangbusters", I should include more than a little bit of the product. Even dealerships let you test drive cars for the obvious reason that you know what you're getting.
Now, considering that I learned of this program from Chase, someone who does seem trustworthy, I am still interested in seeing how it works. Has anyone been through the program? Can you attest to its quality? And highly important: is its money-back guarantee honorable? That is, will they give you all of your money back and not cause any problems for you?
Interested in seeing what you all think.
http://3simplequestions.com/adpre/?afid ... 8eca&SID;=
If that doesn't work, then just type in www.3simplequestions.com.
Supposedly, the egregiously long sales-pitch claims that, among other things, you can make women instantly horny for you by just asking three questions.
Here's what makes this seem off to me:
Easiness: being great at anything takes time. Maybe there are some things out there that can improved with a simple fix but to instantly sleep with countless sexy women after buying a seventy dollar program on the internet is outlandish at best. At the very least, a fair amount of time will be required and the narrator goes into no effort to explain the difficulties which a person may encounter.
The sensationalism: The narrator uses a fair amount of language like "hot, wet pussy that fits like a glove", or "rock star" to get you enticed as well as drawings of an out-of-shape man having sex with gorgeous women.
Cherry-picked testimony: Including a few emails about how the system works great does not mean that there aren't a thousand that attest to its deficiencies.
Time-limit pressure: Apparently, only a hundred people will be able to purchase this program before it "disappears forever" because it's part of a "test group". How much do you want to bet that this website will still be up a month from now or another website will take its place with the same material?
Word Vomit: The narrator tries to drown your sense of reason or ability to think critically by the sheer volume of the introductory audio file. By talking down your resistance, he can overcome it without having provided any logical reason why we should invest in his product.
Affiliation: The narrator is apparently not even the person who developed the program! After the "main" audio file ends, he barrages you with questions that you might have including a hilarious "Can I trust this product?" for which he provides no support except by overemphasizing the premise "Yes, you can definitely trust this product" or by circular reasoning: "Vin says that you can trust this product because it works. You can trust this product because Vin says it works"
Support: The most glaring issue. If this product really works as well as it claims, then why not give a little bit of it away (much like GirlsChase does) to convince people that it does? We would have an idea of what is actually being talked about and we could try it for ourselves. Free samples are invaluable. Simply including testimony is not trustworthy enough. If I included testimony that "Tom Gray's Patented Unicorn Powder" really worked, that is still not reason to believe me. If I'm selling a seventy dollar product that "works like gangbusters", I should include more than a little bit of the product. Even dealerships let you test drive cars for the obvious reason that you know what you're getting.
Now, considering that I learned of this program from Chase, someone who does seem trustworthy, I am still interested in seeing how it works. Has anyone been through the program? Can you attest to its quality? And highly important: is its money-back guarantee honorable? That is, will they give you all of your money back and not cause any problems for you?
Interested in seeing what you all think.