Hello Everyoe,
Hope you are gaming well!
Today, i need some insights and clarifications about two important concepts not only taught her in GC but in every educational resource about persuasion and social Skills. These two concepts are Frame Control/Argumentation and Deep Diving/Diplomacy. My big problem is that i see them as very contradictory even paradoxical. When both of them aim to the same goal which is to persuade the other person of our point of view their paradigm and application is not the same and what we do in one is completely unadvised in the other.
In Frame Control, we try to beat the other person argument or idea by using either better ones and actually winning the duel. Withdrawing or going back or agreeing in some part of it make is considered bad because it would make us loose face and look submissive.
In DeepDiving, it is advised to agree with the other person, not challenging them and going even compromise, and always keep the things in a good mood. The most famous book is How to Win Friends and Influence People. The very idea fo disagreeing or challenging is completely forbidden here.
Where in my experience with people, i can see that both of them work and none of them work depending on the person, situation, etc.. But when we rea any article about either one it's is presented as the WAy and ONLy way to do persuasion with people.
So i want to know if any Social Veteran here could give us a clarification about this. I don't remember how many times i got to the Diplomatic approach where i should debuked my visa a vis and when i debuked and clashed my interlocutor when i should have used a more diplomatci approache.
Thank you
Hope you are gaming well!
Today, i need some insights and clarifications about two important concepts not only taught her in GC but in every educational resource about persuasion and social Skills. These two concepts are Frame Control/Argumentation and Deep Diving/Diplomacy. My big problem is that i see them as very contradictory even paradoxical. When both of them aim to the same goal which is to persuade the other person of our point of view their paradigm and application is not the same and what we do in one is completely unadvised in the other.
In Frame Control, we try to beat the other person argument or idea by using either better ones and actually winning the duel. Withdrawing or going back or agreeing in some part of it make is considered bad because it would make us loose face and look submissive.
In DeepDiving, it is advised to agree with the other person, not challenging them and going even compromise, and always keep the things in a good mood. The most famous book is How to Win Friends and Influence People. The very idea fo disagreeing or challenging is completely forbidden here.
Where in my experience with people, i can see that both of them work and none of them work depending on the person, situation, etc.. But when we rea any article about either one it's is presented as the WAy and ONLy way to do persuasion with people.
So i want to know if any Social Veteran here could give us a clarification about this. I don't remember how many times i got to the Diplomatic approach where i should debuked my visa a vis and when i debuked and clashed my interlocutor when i should have used a more diplomatci approache.
Thank you