- Joined
- Oct 9, 2012
- Messages
- 6,235
Somehow I stumbled across the Quora answers of this guy Matthew Holmes. I've probably binged 5+ hours reading his reports on prison life in the US:
Holmes had a terrible childhood, made worse by the foster care system, ended up on drugs, committing crimes, and finally killed a guy over drugs and money and went to prison. Cleaned himself up when he got out 10 years later, regrets taking a life, but his reports of prison life -- really insightful. This guy's a real character.
Really interesting case study on holding frame in a lot of very tense situations.
He talks several times about the tests prison newbies go through when they first arrive in a prison. There's a lot of seduction parallels, with people testing to find out information about you that runs deeper than what you say with mere words.
At one point he discusses the approach he used to get the guards to stop messing with the contraband he kept in his cell. Whenever they'd shake him down and take his contraband he'd look the guards in the eye and tell them he'll have another one tomorrow. So they could go and do the eight hours of paperwork about what he had and how he must have gotten it and fill all that out, and he'll have another one right back in there the next day. Meanwhile, so long as they weren't doing anything to him, he'd cause them no trouble. They'd figure out it was more work than it was worth and eventually leave him alone.
He had a routine he'd run where guys being taken to isolation in handcuffs would run away from the guards to his cell, he'd jimmy their handcuffs, then hide them somewhere in his cell no guard could find. Such as in crafts he was making with false bottoms or hidden compartments, etc. If the guards couldn't find the handcuffs they'd get severely reprimanded or fired. So after turning everything in his cell inside and out, strip searching him, and everything, and not finding the handcuffs they'd have to play his game and give him the cheeseburgers and a few other things he'd always ask for. Then he'd return the missing handcuffs, and split the reward with the prisoner who brought the handcuffs to him.
There's an interesting distinction running through his stuff between 'inmate' and 'convict'. I hadn't come across this before. There are a few articles that spell out the distinction the same way Holmes uses it. This one is fairly close:
prisonwriters.com
As is this one when it quotes a now-missing 'Prison News Blog' page:
I think it makes for pretty interesting reading, especially for a different lens into various aspects of frame control (used differently, but with the same underlying mechanics here as they get used in seduction).
Chase

Holmes had a terrible childhood, made worse by the foster care system, ended up on drugs, committing crimes, and finally killed a guy over drugs and money and went to prison. Cleaned himself up when he got out 10 years later, regrets taking a life, but his reports of prison life -- really insightful. This guy's a real character.
Really interesting case study on holding frame in a lot of very tense situations.
He talks several times about the tests prison newbies go through when they first arrive in a prison. There's a lot of seduction parallels, with people testing to find out information about you that runs deeper than what you say with mere words.
At one point he discusses the approach he used to get the guards to stop messing with the contraband he kept in his cell. Whenever they'd shake him down and take his contraband he'd look the guards in the eye and tell them he'll have another one tomorrow. So they could go and do the eight hours of paperwork about what he had and how he must have gotten it and fill all that out, and he'll have another one right back in there the next day. Meanwhile, so long as they weren't doing anything to him, he'd cause them no trouble. They'd figure out it was more work than it was worth and eventually leave him alone.
He had a routine he'd run where guys being taken to isolation in handcuffs would run away from the guards to his cell, he'd jimmy their handcuffs, then hide them somewhere in his cell no guard could find. Such as in crafts he was making with false bottoms or hidden compartments, etc. If the guards couldn't find the handcuffs they'd get severely reprimanded or fired. So after turning everything in his cell inside and out, strip searching him, and everything, and not finding the handcuffs they'd have to play his game and give him the cheeseburgers and a few other things he'd always ask for. Then he'd return the missing handcuffs, and split the reward with the prisoner who brought the handcuffs to him.
There's an interesting distinction running through his stuff between 'inmate' and 'convict'. I hadn't come across this before. There are a few articles that spell out the distinction the same way Holmes uses it. This one is fairly close:

Convict or Inmate? (There’s a huge difference, by the way.) | Prison Writers
Convict or Inmate? First of all, the two are definitely not, in any way, synonymous. The first is a state of being – and describes who you inherently are. The second is a being of the state – and describes who you are told […]

As is this one when it quotes a now-missing 'Prison News Blog' page:
In the parlance of the penitentiary, we generally understand an inmate as one who becomes a little bit too closely aligned with the institution and its rules. Inmates are quick to engage in conversation with staff members. It seems as if inmates suffer a bit from the Stockholm Syndrome, where they identify more with their captors than with others who share their captivity.
Convicts differ from inmates. Convicts may abide by the rules, but only because they want to avoid additional aggravations or frustrations. Yet if he believes breaking a rule would be in his interest, he will make his choice and live with the consequences. A convict would never cooperate with a staff member in some kind of diabolical deal to spare himself. Convicts have an air of defiance. He may suppress that defiance, though he feels it coursing through his veins.
I think it makes for pretty interesting reading, especially for a different lens into various aspects of frame control (used differently, but with the same underlying mechanics here as they get used in seduction).
Chase