- Joined
- Nov 20, 2012
- Messages
- 6,551
Hi Guys,
I believe that success with women and success with yourself are two totally different things, but they correlate so well that most guys think it's the same. IT has the same connotation as happiness and materialism that men search for cars and money just to get girls. But If you want to check out that discussion, it's here viewtopic.php?f=8&t=2630&p=12270&hilit=god+search#p11747 (The Search for God)
But anyway this is about women.
So basically you are told to disqualify yourself as boyfriend material, but you are well advised to work on your desires and your goals in life, and that includes women. Then you note. "Eh, what i am trying to achieve here?". Basically the reason why you disqualify yourself as boyfriend material is to set a good precedent with women. Women know that quality husbands, boyfriend and friends are very hard to get, and when they find one, They slow things down. There's a lot of grey areas here where i need Chase here probably to clear this out. and this is one of Chase past comments on me, which might be helpful to you guys.
One might ask why be so successful in Life and career and business when quality women end up with guys who are not as good as them. In my view, Women need to "save face". In a society where marriage is prevalent, she needs to have somebody to depend upon as the "husband or provider role".
You can see this with
Jennifer Aniston (She's not really into anybody but she needs a partner due to societal influence. Disclaimer: I hope they don't kick my a$$.
)
Oprah Winfrey (She doesn't believe in marriage but has a partner)
Women are more pressured to have partners, and men do get replaced, as Chase noted in his article "You not Special, neither is she". IT's a matter of whether the replacement is just playing the "husband or provider" role or she really loves him.
I hope this clears. (To other experienced guys, Help me input if there's any)
Zac
I believe that success with women and success with yourself are two totally different things, but they correlate so well that most guys think it's the same. IT has the same connotation as happiness and materialism that men search for cars and money just to get girls. But If you want to check out that discussion, it's here viewtopic.php?f=8&t=2630&p=12270&hilit=god+search#p11747 (The Search for God)
But anyway this is about women.
So basically you are told to disqualify yourself as boyfriend material, but you are well advised to work on your desires and your goals in life, and that includes women. Then you note. "Eh, what i am trying to achieve here?". Basically the reason why you disqualify yourself as boyfriend material is to set a good precedent with women. Women know that quality husbands, boyfriend and friends are very hard to get, and when they find one, They slow things down. There's a lot of grey areas here where i need Chase here probably to clear this out. and this is one of Chase past comments on me, which might be helpful to you guys.
Re: Meeting Quality Women via Friends or ?
Postby Chase » Fri May 17, 2013 1:33 am
Zac-
ZacAdam wrote:
Any information on dating quality women who have prestige, money, her own place? I can't be a model though, at least my first experience was terrible. and the photographer didn't help me out.
Having a credential or two that you can throw out there off the cuff helps lower defenses a bit. Being able to say "I worked for [prestigious company]" or "I went to [prestigious school]" takes her off guard. You don't want to do TOO much of that, though, or else you either look like a showboat, or such an amazing catch she'll want to be sure to take things slow.
Having something exotic or adventurous about yourself helps a lot. If you're a writer / actor / musician, it doesn't matter if you're stone broke with no mainstream credentials, you can still land girls like this for a fling at least.
I've known several guys who had no education higher than high school and had never held a real job who routinely dated women who were attractive, intelligent, and financially successful with prestigious careers (finance, law, etc.) or athletic/other accomplishments (Olympics, beauty pageants, etc.). One of these guys was very smooth and very good looking (but kind of dumb... he was these smart women's 'guilty pleasure'), and the other guy was average looking but had trained himself to be quite charismatic and was naturally pretty energetic.
If you want an easy way of thinking about it, think about it like this: have at least ONE thing you excel at fairly hard (writing, music, sports, career, charisma, looks, etc.). Surround that with some other stuff you're reasonably excellent in. Then, even ambitious, driven, accomplished women with killer looks will find you intriguing.
Also - have reams of ambition and be able to show it. Have way more ambition than her, and be inspiring about it. Ambitious women (and all very beautiful / very successful women are ambitious) want men MORE ambitious than they are, most of the time (occasionally the very intelligent women like this want smart dweebs for relationships though... they feel more secure with these guys, and relate to them better).
Meet these girls via day game. Social circle can work too, but it's slow and hit-or-miss... you need the right circles for what you're looking for.
Chase
One might ask why be so successful in Life and career and business when quality women end up with guys who are not as good as them. In my view, Women need to "save face". In a society where marriage is prevalent, she needs to have somebody to depend upon as the "husband or provider role".
You can see this with
Jennifer Aniston (She's not really into anybody but she needs a partner due to societal influence. Disclaimer: I hope they don't kick my a$$.
Oprah Winfrey (She doesn't believe in marriage but has a partner)
Women are more pressured to have partners, and men do get replaced, as Chase noted in his article "You not Special, neither is she". IT's a matter of whether the replacement is just playing the "husband or provider" role or she really loves him.
I hope this clears. (To other experienced guys, Help me input if there's any)
Zac