- Joined
- Jul 17, 2013
- Messages
- 1,516
Some colleagues may wish to pick up the list I'm starting here and run with it... feel free to add below!
What I'd like to see, if those who are capable of writing about it should be interested in doing so:
1. Facial muscle control
Chase already wrote a great article 7 Facial Expressions That Drive Women Wild, plus a couple others in a similar vein where he goes into greater detail on the bored look and skeptical look.
What I have in mind here is a little different: how you can "fake it till you make it" with your body language and especially the look that is "written across your face" to increase your dominance in situations such as the following:
2. A Macro-View of Dating
There's a few posts on this forum and some references in articles that I really, frankly, don't understand despite being a reasonably numerate person of above average intelligence with a good grasp of statistics and fair analytical ability.
The basic question is: why are there hints and indirect, subtle suggestions in many places on the site that imply that women have somewhat more power than men in the mating game?
Ricardus states it directly in What Do Girls Look for? They Look for This (Part I): he writes, "women are higher value than men" with shocking candor. Elsewhere, Chase posts a map that is completely incomprehensible to me that implies that across the entire US, women of childbearing age seeking a mate are outnumbered by men seeking a mate (blue all over, without exception), giving men an inherent disadvantage.
I cannot for a moment see why this would be. Baby boys and girls are born in more or less equal numbers as far as I know... well, maybe slightly more boys, but they are more prone to childhood accidents and disease in infancy meaning that by the time they reach puberty the population is pretty much split 50-50 male/female.
So what is skewing the numbers to be so adverse to men's interests?
-Marty
What I'd like to see, if those who are capable of writing about it should be interested in doing so:
1. Facial muscle control
Chase already wrote a great article 7 Facial Expressions That Drive Women Wild, plus a couple others in a similar vein where he goes into greater detail on the bored look and skeptical look.
What I have in mind here is a little different: how you can "fake it till you make it" with your body language and especially the look that is "written across your face" to increase your dominance in situations such as the following:
- Appearing comfortable and confident in a social situation when in reality you are anything but!
- Giving the impression of having abundance with women (when you don't!)
- Coming across as confident and carefree on an approach (when you're not!)
- Looking like a leader, when in real life you're a talented hack at best...
2. A Macro-View of Dating
There's a few posts on this forum and some references in articles that I really, frankly, don't understand despite being a reasonably numerate person of above average intelligence with a good grasp of statistics and fair analytical ability.
The basic question is: why are there hints and indirect, subtle suggestions in many places on the site that imply that women have somewhat more power than men in the mating game?
Ricardus states it directly in What Do Girls Look for? They Look for This (Part I): he writes, "women are higher value than men" with shocking candor. Elsewhere, Chase posts a map that is completely incomprehensible to me that implies that across the entire US, women of childbearing age seeking a mate are outnumbered by men seeking a mate (blue all over, without exception), giving men an inherent disadvantage.
I cannot for a moment see why this would be. Baby boys and girls are born in more or less equal numbers as far as I know... well, maybe slightly more boys, but they are more prone to childhood accidents and disease in infancy meaning that by the time they reach puberty the population is pretty much split 50-50 male/female.
So what is skewing the numbers to be so adverse to men's interests?
-Marty