Suggestions for the GC blog

[moonrayarc]

I open this thread so to make suggestions for improvement of the blog:

for my part, i suggest rating articles by readers, because I see that many articles of some writers do not reach the quality of articles I've been familiar with in GC, espically that now almost 80% (3 to 4 out of 5) of the articles during 1 week are written by other writers other than Chase, which wasn't the case before. So in order to have a broader and accurate view coming from all readers, rating might be a solution

 

[Drck]

It is probably quite difficult to keep writing about the same topic good articles. I mean, there are thousands of details but in its core, there is only limited number of "aha" moments that a reader can get, the rest is only repetition in different words, or simply redundancy... Different authors and writers are needed to see it and understand it from different views...

I remember, I used to make notes from what I read and learned, there were lots of "aha" exciting moments. Looking at the notes today, most seem to be quite primitive...

Think about if you wanted to open your own website about seduction, what would you write about? The same topics were already discussed on other webs, you can put it in nicer words and stories, but the core is the same...

 

[trashKENNUT]

moonrayac,

Think about if you wanted to open your own website about seduction, what would you write about? The same topics were already discussed on other webs, you can put it in nicer words and stories, but the core is the same...

I agree with Drck here. The core is always the same. But if you are keen on your own self study and research, and probably observations, You will realize that Chase has nuggets here and there. Those nuggets shows you why Chase knows his stuff. So it depends on what your goals, whether you interested in getting a girlfriend, or more than that in terms of dating, social, psychology.

Really depends on you, because if you follow everything, you will end up nowhere. This is what i realize for me. There's so many information, it will never end. it's more to testing what works, with different things, and carve out something for yourself.

Zac

 

[Franco]

moonrayarc,

There's so many information, it will never end. it's more to testing what works, with different things, and carve out something for yourself.

ZacAdam pretty much hits the mark here. A lot of the core concepts in seduction are the same, but I've found that grasping different views or different methods can be difficult depending on the person. For example, there are some readers on this website that really enjoy reading Alek's content because, although his core methods follow GC's principles, his approach is a "different type" of direct and slightly different from Chase's. So you'll usually find different examples and perspectives in his articles about sex and seduction that you might not find in Chase's articles (and of course vice versa). I know some regular readers have really found Alek's articles to be quite helpful as supplemental content to what Chase already provides.

The article rating idea has also come up before on the boards, so Chase is aware of the possibility of implementing this. If he deems it as something that will be a positive feature for the website, he'll move forward with it.

- Franco

 

[moonrayarc]

I agree with you upon the fact that at some point, we cannot find more material for articles...except that I see that most of Chase's articles bring most of the time something new, an insightful analysis. Other articles are redundant, sometimes even rewritten copies of previous ones (and here i make an exception of Alek's articles about sexual liberalism that are really insightful)
I suggested the rating because it will give a more accurate reader's opinions about the article and generally the writer. and maybe it will make the latter make some improvements on their future articles