Ok thought #2. I've been too busy to make this a daily thing, but I'm gonna try to update this weekly.
"Pick up" or "dating advice sites" don't have to be misogynistic
This isn't going to be some feminist crazy talk. Promise. But I've seen a lot of articles on dating sites attacking "slutty girls", talking about not dating a certain type of girl, or promoting eating disorders. And I scroll down to see the female commenters firing right back. Its a war of words that seems completely unnecessary. I don't understand it. Ok maybe I do, but it still seems crazy.
Having a process for getting girls or using "game" fundamentally isn't misogynistic. It actually helps women find men who they have strong feelings for. I'm sure every girl out there wouldn't mind getting swept off her feet by a man who is charming, sexy, and confident. I'm pretty sure that's what 90% of romance movies are. And I'm pretty sure guys have no problem with reasonable feminism (the kind that says girls are equal to guys, not the crazy "we don't ever need men" insanity)
So why is there such a fundamental divide between men's dating websites and women? Why do most things these sites publish get labeled as misogynistic? Well the eating disorder thing is pretty obvious. Eating disorders are bad kids. She's gonna be an emotional mess, and I'm sure as hell not dating that kind of girl.
But there's more to it than just the stuff on the surface. On both sides. Many dating sites get overly caught up in the Madonna/whore theory. Articles like 10 ways to tell if a girls a slut, ways not to date a slut, etc, are so wrapped up in this idea its sad. I am actually trying to eliminate slut from my vocabulary. You know why? Because I love girls who are sexual. When you get to see a girl's true sexual side, its a great feeling because she just handed you the keys to the kingdom

. And
sex is natural. "Slutty" girls are just more willing to express themselves. Fine by me

. And there are
no signs for a slut. I've seen girls who were virgins do some of the sluttiest stuff in public, but refuse to fuck in private. And those quiet, shy, pretty girls can be some of the wildest in bed.
If a man picks a virgin to date because he thinks she is going to be faithful,
he's got another thing coming. Because sex is unpredictable (which is why its so fun). That virgin might turn into the most sexually free girl the second she loses her virginity. She'll think, "wow why did wait for this?". Then when her boyfriend goes away for the weekend and fights with her, and she sees that guy she's had a crush on, she wonders, "I wonder how he is in bed" and boom stereotype destroyed.
I should know. My first lay was with a girl like this. I was the second guy she had sex with (the other was her boyfriend who she met in high school). Don't date a girl who is a virgin or religious because she seems like she will be faithful. That's asking for trouble.
The second issue that makes dating sites look misogynistic is they make things rational, not emotional. Girls feel cheated and let down if they were part of a process. Even taken advantage of. But if you have a good process, its meant to give a girl the emotions she wants. And every girl is different. Most girls would love it if their guy looked at a dating site. The confidence boost and fundamental improvement (if the sites any good) will really impress her. But as soon as they find out he learned it from a dating site, they'll get angry.
People don't like finding out that emotions can be created scientifically or "gamed". It makes you feel less special, and more like a machine part than a romantic interest. Girls don't like finding out that there's a path to seduction. It has to happen naturally, they say. This is where they are wrong. Just because something follows a similar path doesn't mean that it isn't unique. For example, everyone know what is going to happen in romance movie (or an action movie). There is a simple plot, tons of emotional (or physical) action, and then happily ever after. But no one would say that the notebook (the lord of the rings) and some other Nicholas Sparks movie/novel (fast and furious) are the same. Look up archetypes for more about that stuff. Its the details which make things special. Just because I used a process (old plot) to get there doesn't make it any less unique.
Moreover, girls get dating advice in every girls magazine they read, from cosmo to redbook. Guys just get their information from different sources. So there's really no reason to complain ladies.
The third part of this is that dating sites knock women off their pedestal. Some do it more gracefully than others, but should do it. Why? Because most guys who read dating sites are SCARED of girls. What's the easiest way to make something less scary? Trivialize it and scientifically explain it. Guys dating websites can't succeed if they don't help guys overcome their fear of women. Although there are good and bad ways of doing it ("cute and silly" vs. "eating disorders are good") it has to be done. If guys don't overcome their fear of women, they'll never make any progress with them. When I say, "she's just a girl, she's cute and silly" its not that a girl is worthless or inferior to a man. Its saying that there are billions of other women out there, and one women isn't a scary thing. I haven't read girls dating advice, but I bet there's plenty of advice trivializing men (articles like, "how to wrap him around your finger") to help women overcome their fear of men.
This is why I really feel like Girls Chase gets it right. Its a "life advice" site that tells men that they have to learn to love women, not hate or resent them. It doesn't promote bitterness or hate, it promotes giving a girl the right emotional feelings and taking her to bed. We call girls cute and silly here because they are and it helps guys overcome a fear of women. Men aren't told to simper or supplicate with girls because its unnatural for anyone, not just men.
Dating sites don't have to be misogynistic. They shouldn't be misogynist. Men should be taught to love women, not as white knights or bitter, angry men, but as genuine men who are dominant. Society (especially western society) needs men who take what they want, are charming, who break the mold, and dominant and good lovers. Those are the men who women want to sweep them off their feet. I think feminist and PUAs can agree on that. Everybody wins.
(except nice guys, sucks to be them)