Yes - Maybe - No-Girls

[Anonymous]

Hi folks,

my name is Moody and I'm new here. I am a GirlsChase follower since summer and think that this site has one of the most realistic and workable Pickup advice out there. Here's my question:

Some guys I talked with said Chase' method could not work for everyone, because it's "good looking guy game", because it's only about presenting yourself, approaching and screening girls by getting investment through compliance. But if you're not that good looking, you would not get girls which are the same level of looks or even hotter than you. This, so these guys meant, is the real definition of someone who has got "game". They told me about KrauserPUA and I should check out his stuff.

There it's told, a guy who is not that good looking needs to work on the attraction phase to get some emotional reactions because most girls would be in the maybe-category (as I know, Mark Manson names it "neutral girls"). So you have to polarize them by teasing an such stuff. Being cool, chill and relaxed and get her invested would not work as long as you didn't demonstrated your sexual market value. This would only work for good looking guys. More about this theory, here: http://krauserpua.com/2014/10/17/good-looking-guy-game/

As I got Chase' he says someone who says you can talk your way into sex don't know how sexual attraction works and that it's either there or not and it would be primarly about looks, style, body language and voice. What do you think about it guys? Is compliance in form of "moving faster" already the kind of "attraction trigger" to polarize her enough or would it get you only girls who are already attracted to you (Yes-Girls)?

I'm not sure when it comes down to my own experience if I didn't work enougn "game" and lost girls I could have attract towards me or if they just weren't sexual available.

Would be nice to hear your insights.

Greets

 

[Franco]

Moody,

As I got Chase' he says someone who says you can talk your way into sex don't know how sexual attraction works and that it's either there or not and it would be primarly about looks, style, body language and voice. What do you think about it guys? Is compliance in form of "moving faster" already the kind of "attraction trigger" to polarize her enough or would it get you only girls who are already attracted to you (Yes-Girls)?

Well, one of the first things Chase talks about on here is your fundamentals and your fashion. In upgrading your sense of style and your fashion (and preferably anything else you can upgrade, such as working out to appear more muscular), you'll get more girls who will be readily attracted to you at a moment's notice. Looks play a huge role in things, but not in the way most men perceive "looks." Most guys think of looks as dark hair, tall, blue eyes, great jawline. While those are attractive they are still minor additions to what is actually more important: what you're wearing, how you're walking, how you're talking, and the overall vibe you give off when you communicate with women. This communicates your overall success with women, and if women sense that you are a guy who knows his way around women sexually, then THAT is more attractive than any other physical feature you can possibly have.

So I would say it's important to focus on looks first because those are things that can literally be upgraded over a weekend. Get some great clothes, get a sexy haircut, grow out some facial hair (ok, so this might take a week or two) and THEN focus on your process toward moving things along in a way that leads toward sex.

In seduction, you want to make sure you're taking advantage of every possible aspect of yourself that can increase your sexual appeal to the opposite sex. If you aren't working on those small details, then you're probably losing out on some beautiful women as well.

- Franco