What's new

AMA I am a 26 year old who has slept with over 50 girls, all 8s and above

trashKENNUT

Cro-Magnon Man
Cro-Magnon Man
Joined
Nov 20, 2012
Messages
6,551
Yea, no issue about the guy. Agree with Franco. :)

But the issue is that he come over and makes himself "God". I don't care if you're "God" just to make yourself have high self esteem.

Just don't barge in people's house and pretend they not there. Because I know I am (at home). XD

p.s: Girlschase community is the only site to tolerate 'bs' more compared to the rest. Why so insistent on being disrespectful?

Zac
 

Rain

Tool-Bearing Hominid
Tool-Bearing Hominid
Joined
Jun 13, 2016
Messages
534
Franco said:
(My girl will also never catch me crying in front of her, for example)

If I remember correctly I was seeing someone and cried in front of her, didn't seem to stop her liking me/sleeping with me. I did definitely have an anxiety/panic attack in front of that woman, didn't stop her from sleeping with me or wanting to be exclusive. A different example with a different woman is I got a bit shocked by something, and she thought I was crying. I wasn't, that was a coincidence where eyes get watery due to sweat or oils or something from head/hair/forehead I'm assuming gets in there. So I told her that and she didn't have a problem still seeing me, except well if she didn't think I was crying in that scenario then its not an crying example is it?

Is it wrong that I want to be able to cry in front of a partner if need be? For 2nd example above, the getting shocked[not anxiety/panic just a bit of shock] out was from an indirect death threat, which , was really unlikely to happen, but in the moment I played it up a bit and wanted her to tell me it won't happen and stay the night and that I'd be ok. I didn't say it in those words but I definitley grabbed her hand and asked her to stay the night after telling her what happened, she went home to get clothes and and she texted me I think when she got home, then text me that she was leaving home, then that she was at maccas getting us food, ie she was giving me updates on where she was so that I would stay calm. This did not stop her from sleeping with me, we still slept together more than once after that, she stopped seeing me because I was a jerk later down the track.

So is that, any sort of , counter evidence that you don't have to be a perfect rock 100% and 'in control' all the time? Add to that the first example where there may have been crying, definitley anxiety/panic with the first one. So maybe the control thing can be, they cut you some slack if they really like you, what about the crying? Same thing? Or is the never crying thing just your personal policy?

Franco said:
If she ever feels like she "has" you, then you're running the relationship incorrectly. Even if you're exclusive to her (by verbal agreement), she needs to feel like there's always some element of you that she can't control, and she must always be chasing to try to gain control over that element if you want to keep her viewing you as the best and sexiest man she has ever met. As the age old saying goes, "you always want the one you can't have." And based upon basic attraction dynamics, this will probably stand true until the end of time.

I know 4 couples, and I would say that I'm 99% sure all 4 of the guys, are not out there approaching women at all. They can't cold approach. And I'm doubtful that they are in any sort of open/poly relationship. Is it different for these couples, who are all married for years, why they still together if the woman thinks they 'have' them? Have the women here cheated and the guys just don't know about it? But, I want to make sure I'm undersatnding the terminology correctly so that we are talking about the same thing. Are you meaning don't be clingy? Eg have other interests/hobbies? I can't say if these guys are clingy or not, I know they all work, so there's that.

Franco said:
To say that my relationship has a planned end date is to stretch out the words that I'm using. It may very well be that my relationship falters a month from now. Or it may be that my woman finds ways to keep my desires directed toward her, and we live a long, fulfilling life together. The thing to take away from this is that you should never expect your relationships to be never-ending, nor should that be your goal. You simply enjoy the relationship as long as possible with your partner, whether that lasts only 2 months or goes on for 50 years.

This sort of confuses me beacuse I don't want to get into a relationship if it won't last. If I think I can do better or eg what if a oneitis comes back onto the scene/is single then I should not be in the current relationship in the first place? Or what if the woman 'gets old'? Like you said if you lose interest, would you leave your woman if she got fat, what if she got breast cancer? If so, wouldn't it be better to not do long term that way the woman never gets hurt? See I struggle with this because I don't want to commit to a woman if it may not last. But how do you know if it will or won't? Or how do you predict your feelings for the next 10 20 years or till the end?

So I try and make sure I will like them forever so we do stay forever? But then is the woman going to do the same thing? I know some women become 'carers' if the guy gets cancer. They don't leave. Do they cheat? I don't know. My thinking, ie you should know beforehand that you would stay together, or is that a flawed mental model? I have this feeling you're going to say flawed mental model ;) If you suddenly improve your game and want to leave, how is that fair on the women if you suddenly have the ability to get more hotter women and then desire them instead? Because then you think, well you should have learned game before going long term, and then find someone. As opposed to finding someone, learning game etc, and then dropping them for someone better, isn't that 'wrong' beacuse that particular woman could have been with someone who wasn't looking to improve and then not get hurt?
 

Franco

Tribal Elder
Tribal Elder
Joined
Nov 14, 2012
Messages
3,637
Rain,

Haven't seen this thread in awhile! But it was a good one. :)

So is that, any sort of , counter evidence that you don't have to be a perfect rock 100% and 'in control' all the time? Add to that the first example where there may have been crying, definitley anxiety/panic with the first one. So maybe the control thing can be, they cut you some slack if they really like you, what about the crying? Same thing? Or is the never crying thing just your personal policy?

My thing about crying is more of a personal policy that I've attempted to make into a hard rule. When I say, "my girl will never catch me crying in front of her," it was more of a reference to me saying, "I will do everything in my power to not let that happen" rather than "if she catches me crying even once, I'm toast."

Ironically, I've actually now cried once in front of my girl. It was unplanned, and I didn't want it to happen, but it did. However, this occurred after being with her for 3 years, so the amount of time I've spent with her combined with her strong opinion of me will drastically reduce the effect of any mistakes like that.

When she did see me cry, she actually thought it was endearing to a certain degree, but that's only because I never cry. It seemed genuine, and it made me relatable. At the same time, crying one time in three years doesn't suddenly make me "not manly," but it's very unmanly to be crying constantly, all the time. If you think about any movie with a strong male character who cries, does he usually do it more than once in the movie? I can't really recall a strong male figure in a movie who cries more than one time!

Anyway, the point here is that crying is not a death knell to your chance of sleeping with (or having a relationship with) any girl who catches you in the act of crying. The point is that crying is generally a feminine trait, and if you do it too often, your woman's opinion of you will go down. Just like a woman might think less of you if you're scared of bugs and scream like a girl every time you see one! Thus, I always plan to not cry so that when I inevitably do cry, my girl sees it as endearing rather than weak.

I know 4 couples, and I would say that I'm 99% sure all 4 of the guys, are not out there approaching women at all. They can't cold approach. And I'm doubtful that they are in any sort of open/poly relationship. Is it different for these couples, who are all married for years, why they still together if the woman thinks they 'have' them? Have the women here cheated and the guys just don't know about it? But, I want to make sure I'm undersatnding the terminology correctly so that we are talking about the same thing. Are you meaning don't be clingy? Eg have other interests/hobbies? I can't say if these guys are clingy or not, I know they all work, so there's that.

I can guarantee you that either one or both parties in all of those relationships is not totally happy.

Relationships in Western society do a ton of things to create external "handcuffs" on both parties once engaging in marriage. Marriage itself is somewhat of a handcuff for the man these days since "divorce rape" is a real thing, so even if he's unhappy, he risks losing a lot more than just a girl when he goes through divorce.

There's also children that become involved. Splitting up becomes a huge disturbance to children and family-oriented values, so sometimes couples stay together for that reason.

Also, cheating happens... a lot. Sometimes the couples stay together for the children, but the wife or the husband seek sexual partners outside of an unsatisfactory marriage.

Basically, people will do just about anything to get out of situations that make them unhappy (and I'd say this is especially true for women). And Western marriage makes a lot of people unhappy. That's not to say that you can't make a marriage work, but I'd say 95% of men are clueless on how to make one work where both parties remain happy. And for that reason, it's not a good idea to use examples of relationships where you really have no idea what thoughts both parties are actually having (and what actions they are taking behind the scenes).

Take your examples with a grain of salt.

This sort of confuses me beacuse I don't want to get into a relationship if it won't last. If I think I can do better or eg what if a oneitis comes back onto the scene/is single then I should not be in the current relationship in the first place? Or what if the woman 'gets old'? Like you said if you lose interest, would you leave your woman if she got fat, what if she got breast cancer? If so, wouldn't it be better to not do long term that way the woman never gets hurt? See I struggle with this because I don't want to commit to a woman if it may not last. But how do you know if it will or won't? Or how do you predict your feelings for the next 10 20 years or till the end?

Relationships are still amazing and fun. Women are exciting and awesome creatures, and I enjoy spending extended periods of time with them. Can you imagine only spending 1 night with every single woman you meet from now until you pass away? I sure couldn't.

I love creating connection (both emotional and physical) with women, and that can only be done through creating relationships. Women are wired to bond with us after sex, so the best connections are made within the period after you have sex with her the first time (which also includes the next few months of sex when you explore each other's bodies and preferences even further, which is loads of fun).

There's just too much to miss out on by not engaging in relationships with women at all. You'd have to have at least a borderline personality disorder to never want to engage in (at least short) relationships with them. One-night stands don't cut it for me (nor do they cut it for most men).

As far as relationships almost always coming to an end: yeah, I mean it's something you really just come to accept. When you think about the actual animal kingdom out there, animals aren't having "until death to us part" relationships with each other. That shit is entirely created by our society to control the masses. It's easier to get production out of people who aren't wildly seeking sex and romance all the time rather than working hard, building new things, and making the country stronger. Society wants you to produce for society: not for yourself.

Once you come to grips with that, you just accept that relationships have a big "?" on how long they will last for you since you're aware of the fact that a "never-ending" relationship most likely won't keep you happy. When you become better at screening for the types of women that you are not only compatible with but also connect with the best, then you end up having longer relationships. If you're really good, you can aim for "until death to us part," but you should always at least be aware of the fact that that is a difficult goal to achieve if you want to maintain long-term happiness, and there's a very strong chance that at some point in any relationship you'll eventually want something else. People's desires are constantly changing, all the time.

I try not to think about things like "what if my woman gets breast cancer and loses a breast?" At that point, I might as well be worried about something like, "what if my woman gets in her car today, gets in an accident, and has an arm and a leg amputated?" Or "what if plane crashes on my woman's office building and she gets killed?" You can't be worried about things that are highly unlikely to happen, otherwise you just become a frozen shell of a person who's afraid to do anything because of the risk of just about anything bad happening.

When you get good at screening, you learn to choose women who take care of themselves both physically and mentally. I don't worry about the things you mentioned because I pick good women who are very focused on things like staying slim and fit. So it's a good idea to know what things are most important to you so that you make wise decisions on which women you want to keep around in your life for extended periods of time.

So I try and make sure I will like them forever so we do stay forever? But then is the woman going to do the same thing? I know some women become 'carers' if the guy gets cancer. They don't leave. Do they cheat? I don't know. My thinking, ie you should know beforehand that you would stay together, or is that a flawed mental model? I have this feeling you're going to say flawed mental model ;) If you suddenly improve your game and want to leave, how is that fair on the women if you suddenly have the ability to get more hotter women and then desire them instead? Because then you think, well you should have learned game before going long term, and then find someone. As opposed to finding someone, learning game etc, and then dropping them for someone better, isn't that 'wrong' beacuse that particular woman could have been with someone who wasn't looking to improve and then not get hurt?

"All is fair in love and war" comes to mind, lol.

Nothing is truly "fair" when it comes to romance these days. Everyone is chasing their own happiness, and there's always a carrot on a stick somewhere attempting to tell you that even more happiness is in this direction instead of the direction you were going. Women get their hearts broken. And so do men. All you can really do is attempt to improve yourself and continually gauge your own levels of happiness and adjust as you go. There might be a few times where you have to break a woman's heart -- if you're a genuinely good man, then you do so with compassion, and you attempt to avoid breaking hearts as often as you possibly can. When you get good at this stuff, you become aware of women's emotions and learn how to manage them well. That way you're breaking less hearts and providing more smiles.

One other thing to note here is that women are extremely strong-willed when it comes down to it. If you break a girl's heart, it's highly unlikely she forfeits the rest of her life because of your deed. At some point, she gathers herself together and delves into love and romance again, and eventually she finds something she wants (at least for the time being). Women are resilient, and as I mentioned previously, women will almost always seek to get themselves out of situations where they are unhappy.

Ideally, you start improving yourself right now so that the quality of women you bring into your life from this point forward is high. This way, instead of breaking the hearts of women you aren't very attracted to, you're instead creating meaningful, fun, and awesome relationships with amazing women who see you as an amazing man. Maybe you strive to make the relationship go for as long as you possibly can, and maybe it actually goes the distance. Or maybe it ends after a few years. Either way, if you find amazing women and bring them into your life, you will have amazing experiences that you can learn from and enjoy, just like she will have amazing experiences that she can learn from and enjoy. Don't let the "fear" of a relationship potentially ending at some point scare you away from starting one.

Personally, I would be much more scared of never being able to have a relationship again!

;)

- Franco
 

Regal Tiger

Cro-Magnon Man
Cro-Magnon Man
Joined
Mar 16, 2015
Messages
1,032
Joy said:
Um... actually I do like to hear more what Onibun has to say. For one thing, controversy is great for growth. Second, he does have a point when he talks about "equality" per say although I feel that Franco and Onibun talk about two different concepts.

Franco encourages men to be leaders in relationships as an argument against "equality" . Onibun focuses his "equality" perspective as an equal change of value between a men and a woman. The concepts aren't really mutually exclusive. Franco refers to power dynamics in a relationship while Onibun talks about a general exchange of values. A strong male leader may provide security to the woman who in turn gives him emotional support where both are happy for example.

Both arguments have imperfections per say.

The omission in Franco's arguments is that relationships where the woman leads can still work. Personal anecdotal evidence shows that a relationship may be healthy and last even if a woman is in control. My grandparents lasted until one of them died, but my grandfather certainly wasn't the one in charge. He was ok with it, so was my grandmother. My parents on the other hand broke apart because both were strong leaders but pulled in different directions. Eventually the ties that held them together got torn and they went their separate ways. From what I saw all long-lasting relationships have a leader and a follower whereas I have seen leader-leader and follower-follower relationships break apart rather often.

Onibun's argument assumes that people in unequal relationships will simply leave. In other words if a girl doesn't feel that she's getting what she want from her man she'll simply wave him goodbye or conversely a man not willing to put up with crap his wife gives him will divorce her at the drop of a hat. The truth is that it isn't so and there are countless relationships in the world where someone has the shorter end of the stick rationalizing the experience away via cultural norms, personal belief systems, victim mentality, or the fear of finding someone better. Are these relationships healthy? Not really. Does it matter? Not really. It is what it is and it's up to the people involved to change things if they want something different. So ultimately for the sake of reproduction, equal levels of investment are necessary and biologically impossible on a cellular level.

Anyway, short of writing another essay, I don't think we should be so quick to shun and direct the guy simply because he has a different perspective. If he's wrong, does it REALLY matter?

Personally,I am actually curios why Onibun invested his time and energy into writing on this site and I would actually like to know more of his story.


I was going to write something similar, but probably not as elegantly :p

Seconded that I enjoy having the guy on here, even though I disagree with some of what he's saying.


EDIT: fuck... I just realized how old this thread is... and now I feel so cheated lol
 

lostnumber

Tool-Bearing Hominid
Tool-Bearing Hominid
Joined
Aug 31, 2017
Messages
307
I'm glad this guy went the way of the dodo. Guys with big dicks generally don't need to walk around saying what a big dick they have.

I think Franco gave him too much cred
 

NealIRC

Space Monkey
space monkey
Joined
Feb 16, 2015
Messages
170
Regarding the whole "equality in relationships" as the OP is suggesting and regarding the "men should dominate women in relationships" as Franco suggests.

I was thinking.

Haven't and aren't women prone to do the "I'll break up with you 1st" if I don't get my way. Then of course, men are to go "Go ahead, break up with me."

Sorry, but I think there are certain factors that men just can't change or dominate about women.

For example, my dad had a doctor friend who had lots and lots of oral sex with Muslim women. Oral sex - because Allah only condemns vaginal sex, Islam does not talk about oral sex. Therefore, Muslim women do oral sex.

Can a real dominant man change that about Muslim women?

In that case, women can be 1st and foremost about something, and so men must adapt to that.

Franco said:
(My girl will also never catch me crying in front of her, for example)
Why? Because - you have no *balls* to.

The interesting thing is, I'd use this example as examples of contradictions in attracting women.

When you cry in front of your girl, you're showing her you have balls, and not caring what she thinks. She can take it, dismiss it, and all the stuff in between.

But if she knew you were trying to hide crying from her, that's gonna be a turn-off. It takes balls for men to explain what their flaws, fears, weaknesses, and insecurities are, and not all men have the balls to do it.
 

Franco

Tribal Elder
Tribal Elder
Joined
Nov 14, 2012
Messages
3,637
Neal,

Why? Because - you have no *balls* to.

The interesting thing is, I'd use this example as examples of contradictions in attracting women.

When you cry in front of your girl, you're showing her you have balls, and not caring what she thinks. She can take it, dismiss it, and all the stuff in between.

But if she knew you were trying to hide crying from her, that's gonna be a turn-off. It takes balls for men to explain what their flaws, fears, weaknesses, and insecurities are, and not all men have the balls to do it.

Unfortunately, that's mainstream garbage my friend! "If you're a real man, you can cry in front of your girl and she'll love it!"

For your next girlfriend, I suggest this: make sure to cry in front of her at least once every 2-3 months and then report your results after 2-3 years. If she's still head over heels for you, I'll promote your rank one level on the spot. ;)

- Franco
 

Rain

Tool-Bearing Hominid
Tool-Bearing Hominid
Joined
Jun 13, 2016
Messages
534
Franco said:
I know 4 couples, and I would say that I'm 99% sure all 4 of the guys, are not out there approaching women at all. They can't cold approach. And I'm doubtful that they are in any sort of open/poly relationship. Is it different for these couples, who are all married for years, why they still together if the woman thinks they 'have' them? Have the women here cheated and the guys just don't know about it? But, I want to make sure I'm undersatnding the terminology correctly so that we are talking about the same thing. Are you meaning don't be clingy? Eg have other interests/hobbies? I can't say if these guys are clingy or not, I know they all work, so there's that.

I can guarantee you that either one or both parties in all of those relationships is not totally happy.

Relationships in Western society do a ton of things to create external "handcuffs" on both parties once engaging in marriage. Marriage itself is somewhat of a handcuff for the man these days since "divorce rape" is a real thing, so even if he's unhappy, he risks losing a lot more than just a girl when he goes through divorce.

There's also children that become involved. Splitting up becomes a huge disturbance to children and family-oriented values, so sometimes couples stay together for that reason.

Also, cheating happens... a lot. Sometimes the couples stay together for the children, but the wife or the husband seek sexual partners outside of an unsatisfactory marriage.

Basically, people will do just about anything to get out of situations that make them unhappy (and I'd say this is especially true for women). And Western marriage makes a lot of people unhappy. That's not to say that you can't make a marriage work, but I'd say 95% of men are clueless on how to make one work where both parties remain happy. And for that reason, it's not a good idea to use examples of relationships where you really have no idea what thoughts both parties are actually having (and what actions they are taking behind the scenes).

Take your examples with a grain of salt.

3 of those couples do have children. But it didn't happen right after marriage if that changes anything? Eg they must have still liked each other well past the "2 year drop" to have children after that? One of them had to go through IVF. That particular couple, either waited 6months before meeting face to face from online, or waited 6months before having their first kiss, can't remember which. They did other things but kept intercourse off the table until marriage. Maybe there are some couples that are way less "primal" in their decision making? 3 of the 4 were fat chicks basically if that changes anything or not.

So do you have evidence... studies? Or anecdotal evidence with male friends or even women you know who are unhappy? Acutally, just reminded me.... I used to do a bit of online gaming and one bloke said he his wife is a bitch but he stayed with her because of the kids. Possibly the divorce issues too? I can't remember. A older woman I met couple times told me a story one of her female friends said. I'm guessing 40s or 50s this couple, the female says to her "Why can't he get that thing away from me?" and "He every morning rubs that against my back, why can't he leave it alone?" So clearly no sexual appetite from the womans side. And the woman that told me this story is single[but not my type] wishes she could find someone herself!

But see, that's only what, two stories. It's not a huge, 50+ percent or something. Did all the people I used to game with have same issues? I do not know.

So anyway just a few stories, I could ask the couples I mentioned, and also another couple, but how would I do it to get the real story. Would I ask both the guy/girl in front of each other, or just ask them both separately? Then again, if anyone is doing cheating and ie its not an open/poly relationship, then they won't say it in font of their partner, and wouldn't tell me anyway, right? So how am I supposed to even know this is true? From my own friends/family I mean? Although female siblings/cousins of mine might be more open with me if I told them no judgement, just wondering in case I ever get married myself.

Also, what are the percentages? Eg is it... like you guaranteed that out of those 4couples if the woman feels like she has the man, then she would probably be unhappy... you're talking like, a 100% rate of unhappiness there?


Franco said:
This sort of confuses me beacuse I don't want to get into a relationship if it won't last. If I think I can do better or eg what if a oneitis comes back onto the scene/is single then I should not be in the current relationship in the first place? Or what if the woman 'gets old'? Like you said if you lose interest, would you leave your woman if she got fat, what if she got breast cancer? If so, wouldn't it be better to not do long term that way the woman never gets hurt? See I struggle with this because I don't want to commit to a woman if it may not last. But how do you know if it will or won't? Or how do you predict your feelings for the next 10 20 years or till the end?

Relationships are still amazing and fun. Women are exciting and awesome creatures, and I enjoy spending extended periods of time with them. Can you imagine only spending 1 night with every single woman you meet from now until you pass away? I sure couldn't.

I love creating connection (both emotional and physical) with women, and that can only be done through creating relationships. Women are wired to bond with us after sex, so the best connections are made within the period after you have sex with her the first time (which also includes the next few months of sex when you explore each other's bodies and preferences even further, which is loads of fun).

There's just too much to miss out on by not engaging in relationships with women at all. You'd have to have at least a borderline personality disorder to never want to engage in (at least short) relationships with them. One-night stands don't cut it for me (nor do they cut it for most men).

As far as relationships almost always coming to an end: yeah, I mean it's something you really just come to accept. When you think about the actual animal kingdom out there, animals aren't having "until death to us part" relationships with each other. That shit is entirely created by our society to control the masses. It's easier to get production out of people who aren't wildly seeking sex and romance all the time rather than working hard, building new things, and making the country stronger. Society wants you to produce for society: not for yourself.

Once you come to grips with that, you just accept that relationships have a big "?" on how long they will last for you since you're aware of the fact that a "never-ending" relationship most likely won't keep you happy. When you become better at screening for the types of women that you are not only compatible with but also connect with the best, then you end up having longer relationships. If you're really good, you can aim for "until death to us part," but you should always at least be aware of the fact that that is a difficult goal to achieve if you want to maintain long-term happiness, and there's a very strong chance that at some point in any relationship you'll eventually want something else. People's desires are constantly changing, all the time.

I try not to think about things like "what if my woman gets breast cancer and loses a breast?" At that point, I might as well be worried about something like, "what if my woman gets in her car today, gets in an accident, and has an arm and a leg amputated?" Or "what if plane crashes on my woman's office building and she gets killed?" You can't be worried about things that are highly unlikely to happen, otherwise you just become a frozen shell of a person who's afraid to do anything because of the risk of just about anything bad happening.

When you get good at screening, you learn to choose women who take care of themselves both physically and mentally. I don't worry about the things you mentioned because I pick good women who are very focused on things like staying slim and fit. So it's a good idea to know what things are most important to you so that you make wise decisions on which women you want to keep around in your life for extended periods of time.

That thing about yeah a plane crash, cancer, etc it's like I want to be in purely "open" relationships because, I'm afraid of what if, even if they are unlikely sceanrios. I remember having the same conversation with a bloke I worked with way back in like, 2009 or something lol. And he just reckoned 'it wont' happen', that was his mindset when I mentioned about being exclusive and what if they get cancer? Maybe my mindset formed from losing a close family member when I was young so maybe that played a role, want to prevent any pain with anything, zero risk, or maybe that's a coincidence and I just have a literal/logical black/white no grey no balance. That's how I'm wired. But I am changing it a bit.

Maybe small steps? If I imagine being exclusive, sometimes I don't know why, it's like my heart skips a beat and I feel sick or anxious or stressed for some reason. Maybe next time I meet someone with mutual attraction, I can take a smaller step and maybe suggest like 'try' being exclusive for a week? The woman might not like hearing that, lol, I don't know the correct way to frame that. I also know generally speaking you're supposed to wait say 3months before being exclusive, correct?
 

Richard

Tribal Elder
Tribal Elder
Joined
Mar 1, 2013
Messages
1,819
NealIRC said:
Regarding the whole "equality in relationships" as the OP is suggesting and regarding the "men should dominate women in relationships" as Franco suggests.

I was thinking.

Haven't and aren't women prone to do the "I'll break up with you 1st" if I don't get my way. Then of course, men are to go "Go ahead, break up with me."

Sorry, but I think there are certain factors that men just can't change or dominate about women.

For example, my dad had a doctor friend who had lots and lots of oral sex with Muslim women. Oral sex - because Allah only condemns vaginal sex, Islam does not talk about oral sex. Therefore, Muslim women do oral sex.

Can a real dominant man change that about Muslim women?

In that case, women can be 1st and foremost about something, and so men must adapt to that.

Franco said:
(My girl will also never catch me crying in front of her, for example)
Why? Because - you have no *balls* to.

The interesting thing is, I'd use this example as examples of contradictions in attracting women.

When you cry in front of your girl, you're showing her you have balls, and not caring what she thinks. She can take it, dismiss it, and all the stuff in between.

But if she knew you were trying to hide crying from her, that's gonna be a turn-off. It takes balls for men to explain what their flaws, fears, weaknesses, and insecurities are, and not all men have the balls to do it.

Keep in mind that MEN are the ones who set the standard in the relationship and most men do a terrible job. Women become empowered to "break up first" because the man allows it because he sets a terrible precedent very early on; it isn't wise to take "traditional" or "standard" notions of dating and apply them to these forums because the guys here are not "standard" or "typical."

Regarding the Muslim women and vaginal sex; yes, a dominant man can get a Muslim woman to have vaginal sex. Religious ties are certainly strong but women have stronger fears that supersede religious fears and a lot of genuine men (I prefer the term genuine, rather than dominant) bring out those more important fears (which is healthy).

Regarding crying; that's more nuanced than you might think. Think about what it takes to reach a point where you actually cry and ball your eyes out (in most cases!) and you'll see that the requirements to cry are things that aren't dominant/alpha (I hate these terms)/high value. Genuine men remain in control of situations and themselves and, therefore, do not often reach a point where they have to cry - obvious examples where it's acceptable are things like the death of a loved one, etc. Job loss, a girl cheating, etc. are not reasons a genuine man would cry. That being said, I have cried in front of my "main girl" twice and she could relate to it.

If you were a guy who broke down and cried about everything all the time then her opinion of you would change for the worse.

Last thing; you and I don't disagree on things (I'm a huge proponent of knowing and understanding your own weaknesses, insecurities, etc.) but we disagree on how we display them. When you acknowledge and understand your own flaws you start to absolve them of their power over you and so they don't push you, as easily, to a point where you cry or lash out emotionally.

Calmness > Anger > Crying in society. Men who stay calm are more attractive than men who lash out with anger who are more attractive than men who cry in the face of adversity.

-Richard
 

Drck

Cro-Magnon Man
Cro-Magnon Man
Joined
Feb 14, 2013
Messages
1,488
Too bad Omnibun is gone, I’d like to see some of the gems he was talking about. I believe Omninun is a cool and knowledgeable guy, but I didn’t really see much difference between what he describes and what is described on GC

I re-read most of the replies (including mines), here are some things Onibun didn’t see under the right light, or simply minimizing its importance:




* Has great abundance mentality, talking to lots of girls, date and/or sleep with lots of girls...
* Talks about sleeping with lots of models. Ok, good, but the pics he posted, those women would be around 6-7 on my scale, I don’t even see one 8
* Was selling cars - so basically practicing assertiveness and social skills, approaching many different strangers daily, talking to lots of people...
* Admits having lots of confidence, describes confidence as not giving two shits
* Admits being successful in life
* His Pops was working in broadcasting, he met lots of high profile people, CEO’s, celebrities, millionaires
* Traveled around the world 13 plus times
* Based on writing style, Omnibun is obviously intelligent and independent (of opinions of others), has his own mind
* Omnibun: “hundred years ago, 99% of our communication was verbal”. Not sure what he meant exactly but this is incorrect. Body language usually conveys more communication than words, estimates are around 70%. Either way, because of phones and internet, we communicate more with different people today, not less
* Talks about Shift in gender roles, feminism... IMO most of us are aware of the shift... It just comes down to opinions...
* Expressions like Dominance, being dominant in relationship are difficult to describe, they could mean different things for different people. Same with Equality, healthy relationships and so on


I could go on and on but it is pointless. I would really like to see much more from Omnibun, especially the gems, but IMO there is nothing new... if we look at the above it is clear that Omnibun has lots of what is needed in his background that is important in dealing with women.

We can also debate the importance of having money or not, the reality is that somebody had to pay for these 13 travels around the world, whether it was Omnibun, his pops or somebody else... Compare it to ‘average’ guy out there whose pops is not working in broadcasting, he never met famous people or CEO’s, who can hardly pay his bills because he can’t get the job he wants, and who has troubles approaching girls or making friends because he was just not raised to be social...

I mean, we are really just comparing apples to bananas here. If my pops was rock star, my mom model, and I inherited couple millions from by grandpa, my life would have been little bit different too, I can imagine...
 
you miss 100% of the shots you don't take

NealIRC

Space Monkey
space monkey
Joined
Feb 16, 2015
Messages
170
Franco said:
Unfortunately, that's mainstream garbage my friend! "If you're a real man, you can cry in front of your girl and she'll love it!"

For your next girlfriend, I suggest this: make sure to cry in front of her at least once every 2-3 months and then report your results after 2-3 years. If she's still head over heels for you, I'll promote your rank one level on the spot. ;)

- Franco

Richard said:
Regarding crying; that's more nuanced than you might think. Think about what it takes to reach a point where you actually cry and ball your eyes out (in most cases!) and you'll see that the requirements to cry are things that aren't dominant/alpha (I hate these terms)/high value. Genuine men remain in control of situations and themselves and, therefore, do not often reach a point where they have to cry - obvious examples where it's acceptable are things like the death of a loved one, etc. Job loss, a girl cheating, etc. are not reasons a genuine man would cry. That being said, I have cried in front of my "main girl" twice and she could relate to it.

If you were a guy who broke down and cried about everything all the time then her opinion of you would change for the worse.

Aha! It's not the amount of times a man cries that a woman judges, but the reason for what a man cries.

Quantity vs. quality.
 

NealIRC

Space Monkey
space monkey
Joined
Feb 16, 2015
Messages
170
Richard said:
Regarding the Muslim women and vaginal sex; yes, a dominant man can get a Muslim woman to have vaginal sex. Religious ties are certainly strong but women have stronger fears that supersede religious fears and a lot of genuine men (I prefer the term genuine, rather than dominant) bring out those more important fears (which is healthy).
Okay, I think if it could somehow be discreet, then yes, Muslim women can have the pre-marital sex. Much harder to get her to do pre-marital sex and let her proudly let her whole family know.

How bout women being sluts and breaking down her anti-slut defense? I'm sure a woman that went head over heels for you could send you slutty pics. But what about getting her to change her profile picture of her in bikinis, so all her female friends, and guy friends, can see? Discreet slut vs. non-discreet slut. That's basically asking her to abandon all her female friends for you.
 

trashKENNUT

Cro-Magnon Man
Cro-Magnon Man
Joined
Nov 20, 2012
Messages
6,551
NealIrc,

If your fundamentals is solid, you can do anything, almost anything. With game, you can almost almost anything.

But i am ambivalent on religious women and the "right thing". Because in today's world. and perhaps ever, it was a lie all along. I'm sorry if this is a dissonance to anyone.

I am just telling something that i conclude. It always existed. Only the internet exposes us as we are.

Zac
 

NealIRC

Space Monkey
space monkey
Joined
Feb 16, 2015
Messages
170
I'm from Chicago, and I know a lot of Chicago gang stories.

Here's some stories about Hispanic girls in gangs.

1. Where a guy broke up with a girl.

Here's a Puerto Rican story..

Note that I do not know of any stories of Mexican girls chasing after Mexican guys, only White women chasing after and pursuing White men.

I finally found 1 of Puerto Rican girls chasing after Puerto Rican guys.

So he broke up with her. What did she do to revenge? Well, he was a drug seller. And when drug buyers came to his house, his girl was there.

And so, she revenged at him, by having a kid with his best client. He didn't know this until he came out of prison, that she mothered a child with his former best client.

And she relationshipped with him too.

Now, I told this story to a Mexican gang leader. He goes "See, I would never let my girl around my boys, I would never introduce her to them, or introduce them to her. Because, $hit could happen."

And I think there are stories where a woman can revenge at a guy, from not pursuing her, that she'll try to interact with his best guy friends some how.

There's also stories where a woman will relationship with a guy she was lesser attracted to, because a guy she was more attracted to, didn't make his move on her.
 
Top