- Joined
- Mar 28, 2015
- Messages
- 60
Hey friends,
I've just been rereading the newest gem by Drexel and I've found an interesting comment,so I'm posting it below - I hope it will start a wonderful discussion.
It's inspired me to bring this topic to our boards as here we can shed some light on this matter. As far as I know, we don't have any piece about balancing these two sides of our nature (or do we? if so, please let me know - however, I remember we DO have articles about masculinity). To add my 2 cents to the question: even though we all have our goals aligned - to become the best seducers as possible, therefore: to become the most masculine guys we can - we all have both masculine and feminine traits.
In different life circumstances we show our different sides - during truly sad occasions (like burials of our loved ones) men cry, in danger situations women may exude dominance to preserve well-being of them and their loved ones etc. Hence, we display traits normally connected with opposite sex. I know I've given kinda extreme examples - where such behaviors are both justified and truly right.
To build up on the comment by Anon, I'd like to ask this: what is the maximum amount of masculinity we should aim for? Also, what is achievable?
To illustrate the questions above, I'll give you this example - when we talk about heat engines, we know that we cannot build anything better than the Carnot engine, because it is physically impossible. In given circumstances we get different (better/worse) engines of such kind, but they are abstract - in completely ideal conditions we can make 'em, but in reality all our constructions won't be as good as the ideal one. Having the knowledge of what's possible in the best abstract conditions, we can deduce what can be achieved in the reality. (If you want to know more, check here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carnot_heat_engine.)
So, using this metaphor: what is our "Carnot masculinity"? What would be maximum masculinity in most ideal conditions - and how it relates to real life? Is 100% masculinity even possible... and if so, would it be good? Also, how much of the feminine side should we have to be the best of the best?
Thanks for reading, fellas - I know it's long, but I've done my best to trim it... And now you have the results.
- J.
I've just been rereading the newest gem by Drexel and I've found an interesting comment,so I'm posting it below - I hope it will start a wonderful discussion.
Anonymous said:I'd like to dive deeper into what being masculine really means and balancing feminine and masculine qualities within yourself. I definitely have masculine qualities, yet I feel as I have a lot of feminine qualities that throw the balance off. Does that make sense?
It's inspired me to bring this topic to our boards as here we can shed some light on this matter. As far as I know, we don't have any piece about balancing these two sides of our nature (or do we? if so, please let me know - however, I remember we DO have articles about masculinity). To add my 2 cents to the question: even though we all have our goals aligned - to become the best seducers as possible, therefore: to become the most masculine guys we can - we all have both masculine and feminine traits.
In different life circumstances we show our different sides - during truly sad occasions (like burials of our loved ones) men cry, in danger situations women may exude dominance to preserve well-being of them and their loved ones etc. Hence, we display traits normally connected with opposite sex. I know I've given kinda extreme examples - where such behaviors are both justified and truly right.
To build up on the comment by Anon, I'd like to ask this: what is the maximum amount of masculinity we should aim for? Also, what is achievable?
To illustrate the questions above, I'll give you this example - when we talk about heat engines, we know that we cannot build anything better than the Carnot engine, because it is physically impossible. In given circumstances we get different (better/worse) engines of such kind, but they are abstract - in completely ideal conditions we can make 'em, but in reality all our constructions won't be as good as the ideal one. Having the knowledge of what's possible in the best abstract conditions, we can deduce what can be achieved in the reality. (If you want to know more, check here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carnot_heat_engine.)
So, using this metaphor: what is our "Carnot masculinity"? What would be maximum masculinity in most ideal conditions - and how it relates to real life? Is 100% masculinity even possible... and if so, would it be good? Also, how much of the feminine side should we have to be the best of the best?
Thanks for reading, fellas - I know it's long, but I've done my best to trim it... And now you have the results.
- J.