Can you explain why you seem to think all emotional stimulation in all contexts is helpful for seduction?
This is an important point. You should always be stimulating her with powerful emotions, but definitely
not ALL emotional stimulation in ANY context.
It all depends on how her current physical and psychological environment is affecting her emotionally.
Women respond differently depending on their emotional state at that specific moment in time. I remember there's a great article on GC I tried to find that describes this perfectly. Anyway, your job is to find out
which emotional chord she is in tune with at
that moment.
Luckily, depending on where she is in her life, you can make a good educated guess if your observational and social skills are well honed. For example, most miniskirt wearing 18 year old cheerleaders in nightclubs won't react strongly to a story about settling down to a quiet and peaceful family life.
But the same woman still single at 35? Much more likely. If it's her Dad's birthday who passed away 3 years ago and you're both in his favorite bar, her melody is probably going to be weighted heavily towards sadness, nostalgia, etc. So you still need your social calibration and reading skills.
This is why I love those super compact stories that wildly jump from emotion to emotion. You deliver them line-by-line and watch her reaction. If she reacts negatively to something sad, move on to the next line and be careful with sad stuff. If she reacts positively to dirty things, your mind should go
then keep feeding her those dirtier raunchier emotions she wants.
No one is denying that it’s a powerful tool.
I think of it more like learning a different language rather than acquiring a tool. A tool is something which specifically performs X function. But a language is a higher category of thing, it is a field of knowledge with a system, and a framework. A compliment is more of a tool in the way you describe it but it functions from within, and is defined by, the existing framework (language).
When you think about it, once you acquire a language it becomes a passive ability that sort of hovers in the background. It activates automatically when you find a speaker of language X, with whom you can use your existing conversational tools. You don't need to consciously activate your 'English language toolkit' to understand this sentence, it's always there.
This 'emotional language' acts the same, once you become fluent it activates automatically around people who enjoy speaking it (women) and it
should make any 'tools' you're using work better.
But what you suggested sounds almost as polarizing as walking up to a girl and asking, “hey honey can I pee in your butt?”
Your comment made me recall the most polarizing game moments of my life. I remember back in my 20s I did this course where on the final day, you ask 50 women point blank on the streets to sleep with you right away. You would think the response would be disgust or horror or terror...
50% laughed and loved it but were 'busy' or had 'boyfriends' (auto-rejection), 38% were shocked and almost paralyzed that I even said that (submissive). 10% had mild negative reactions (damaged, don't want them anyway). 2% said yes (my directness and boldness hit the right chord).
Are you afraid of being polarizing?
I love being polarizing. Alpha males are EXTREMELY polarizing. Just their presence alone triggers women emotionally (even men). He's a very love-hate type of figure.
Check out the most polarizing guys with the worst reputations, and they are all sleeping with super attractive women with no effort, one after another, and treating them like shit. Bikies. Actors. Drug Dealers. Street Brawlers. Dark Triad Types. Footballers. Rappers. Con Artists. PLAYERS.
I've said (and done)
way worse than your
pee pee in the butt butt line and gotten laid. Funnily enough, you reminded me of last year when this 19 year old asked me to pee on her in my bathtub. This was after I said jokingly in the beginning of the conversation something like she's smells like a hobo because I pissed on her.
