- Joined
- Jan 24, 2021
- Messages
- 2,113
I’ve always been very interested in the study of body language. As I’m sure most people are aware, the vast majority of communication between two people – and by that I mean communication that counts in terms of influence - is non-verbal. Every move you make – every time you shift your weight in a particular direction, orient your head and shoulders, make a hand gesture, and most importantly of all, what expression is on your face – tells people something about your actual relationship with them. It may also tell them what kind of relationship you would like to have with them, but that information is virtually irrelevant, and we subconsciously discard it almost immediately. What matters, and what we instinctively and without conscious effort move our attention toward, is information that tells us our actual position relative to the world around us, and that includes the person in front of us.
I don’t think this is a terribly new concept to anyone with basic observational skills and who has spent any time reflecting on how to deal with other people in general. Where I think most people hit the wall very hard is knowing what to do with that information.
For men in a competitive social environment, whether it’s at a bar, in a business meeting, or even in a sufficiently large group in private, the lowest level of skill is to simply try to out-compete everyone individually in a straightforward dominance competition. Guys at this level think of social interactions as a zero sum game where you always have to one-up the person in front of you. You are a one-man army fighting on all fronts against potential competitors. The kind of people who remain at this level for any period of time are usually very self-centered, short-term-oriented people, or people who have identified something very weak about themselves and are afraid that others will take advantage of it.
There are several problems with this. The first one is that if you have any sort of varied social life, you will not be the established ‘alpha’ in at least a good portion of the social situations you find yourself in. In this case, you are setting yourself up for trouble – your one-man army is walking straight into a well-defended position where your ‘opponents’ have had all the time in the world to establish and fortify it against an invader. When someone does this in a social situation, either they realize this and surrender quickly so that they can be co-opted into the group (usually at a very low position, given that they did such a poor job of managing their approach), or they simply bounce off and are shut out of any opportunity to have a useful interaction where they might be able to establish some influence.
The second problem is that it’s an extremely tiring thing to do for any length of time. Because other people quickly identify you as a threat to themselves, everyone resists you at some level, and people with even weak alliances will put any competition between themselves on hold to rout you out, since you present an easy target that will strengthen both their individual position and the alliance. It’s like a group of dogs growling and squaring up to eachother, and then a cat runs in between, they instantly forget about the fight and go after the cat. Why fight if you can all chase the cat together? You will constantly be dealing with concerted attempts to resist you and throw you back. I guess a lot of those stupid movies, where some guy is surrounded by ten opponents and then proceeds to insult and provoke them, and then dish out some kung-fu when they come at him one at a time with choreographed wild punches, gives guys this impression that this is the ideal modus operandi for dominance in a competitive environment. In reality, you will simply end up copping some amount of punches, and in all likelihood lose altogether.
The third problem is probably the most important one, and that is that you will never be able to take the opportunity to make someone truly like you and want to follow you and become devoted to you, if the gesture required to make that happen goes against your one-upmanship philosophy. If everything is always competitive, any gesture that requires lifting someone else up seems very risky and makes you vulnerable to appearing ‘weak’. But it also means that in any given interaction, the other person will never feel good, and that means that over time they will certainly not move toward a closer or more submissive relationship with you.
I’ve often studied the body language of world leaders, because their image and presentation is something on which a lot of things rest that are difficult to balance – their appeal to everyday people, their appeal to parties seeking an alliance, their ability to appear as a threat to competitors and foes, their ability to negotiate at the level of state politics and then present it in terms that appeal to people who have no idea of what is really involved.
I don’t think most leaders actually do a very good job of that, at all, but because most people in a country are already completely loyal to a party, it doesn’t change very much. Where I think you can get a good estimation of how well a leader does balance those things, is in the viewpoint that ordinary people in other countries have on them.
I don’t want to get the site in trouble with Google, but I’m sure a lot of people are aware of a particular president in Europe who seems to be generally well-respected by a large number of ordinary people around the world. There are numerous popular videos showing him interacting in all sorts of different situations, with men, women, children, and animals, in all kinds of high pressure and low pressure situations. And if you have any understanding of human psychology, you can see that he is routinely successful at establishing a relationship within a few seconds where he maintains a dominant position while validating the person in front of him in a way that makes them feel great, and he almost never gets into a jostling match or confrontation with even the sort of people who pride themselves at that sort of thing. How does he do this?
The answer, in my opinion, is that he is an expert at reading people and identifying almost instantly how that person sees themselves and validates themselves in relation to the world around them.
Everyone believes they are great people, but everyone also believes they are great people for a reason. And that reason is very much tied to what we consider to be our role in life, against which we evaluate ourselves, and by being successful at which we feel fundamentally successful. You cannot be a flight attendant or a waiter without valuing the role of attending to people’s needs and making them comfortable. You cannot be a police officer without valuing the role of defending and protecting others. You cannot be a teacher without valuing the role of developing people and enhancing their capabilities. You cannot be a father or mother without valuing the respective roles that you will have to play in taking care of, protecting, and developing your children. You cannot be a leader without valuing the role of developing a mission and bringing people together around that mission.
And it goes to a more fundamental level as well - you can't be a good-natured person without valuing diplomacy and conflict-resolution, you can't be a competitive person without valuing strength, aggression, and perseverance, you can't be a principled person without valuing standing up against what you don't like. You can't be a girl without valuing the sincere admiration of a man who understands you and enjoys all the pleasant attributes of female nature, nor can you be a man without valuing the admiration of a woman who understands what a man really is and enjoys all the positive dimensions of his masculinity.
What makes someone very successful in one-on-one interactions, no matter whether they are dealing with a world leader or a random person on the street, whether they are in a highly competitive environment or a relaxed social one, is to quickly identify what values another person associates with their own identity, and reflecting to them a validation of it.
One of the reasons this works so well is that you don’t necessarily have to establish who you are in relation to them, since in that moment, you are merely a reflection of what they value about themselves. This means you don’t have to get them to submit to or accept your dominance of the interaction, which is very very difficult with someone who might have little idea of who you are and what you might do with that position. And it also works because is very difficult to separate validation of your core self from its source, and thus disarms people who are emotionally confrontational.
In seduction, deep diving is essentially this – bringing out the values and concepts that a girl has about herself, and especially her core or potential self as opposed to the self that she has to maintain every day, and validating them.
Deep diving, in my opinion, begins from the moment you meet, even if it starts off not very deep, and gets deeper as time goes on. As soon as the first interaction begins, you want to quickly identify the most unique things about her, preferably about her personality, but also physical or style-related things that would have required work or choice on her part to maintain – since this is of course an indication that it’s something she really values.
As the interaction goes on, you want to go deeper, into her core personality traits and interests, and then even deeper toward the things she privately values that most people around her might not be aware of. Always moving along a path led by the golden question: what kind of girl are you really? And all this time, you want to engage her, with your words but most of all with your body language, showing her that those things appeal to you at a deep level.
To do that well, you have to come across neutral as to your own agenda, or at least driven by something very natural and organic, directed by your curiosity and spontaneous engagement with the things you are validating, like a mirror in which people see the things they enjoy seeing in themselves. And this goes back to all my earlier points: if you are trying to be competitive, and you are trying to one-up every interaction, and you are trying to force a dominant or controlling frame that establishes your authority and point of view, you cannot be that mirror. You must be tranquil, unreactive, warm and personal, as sincere as you can be, and in that moment you must see the other person not as a tool to get what you want, but as someone who is developing along a certain path along which they have already accrued some success, and have the potential to accrue much more success, and who, by developing that way, pleases the world around them, including yourself.
And this also means that, to establish good relationships fast, your body language must be on point - solid but reassuring, showing no anxiety, fear, or aggression, open and welcoming, like the Good King who knows exactly where to put everyone so that they can thrive and be successful.
In doing that, it’s not hard to seduce a woman or at least make her feel very pleased to have met you, to establish good relationships with all sorts of people above you, below you, people who are temperamentally aggressive and people who are temperamentally passive, competitive opponents or teammates, men and women, and every creature on earth which wants to reach success according to its own concept of value.
There are always your foes who will try to take you down no matter what, who should in an ideal world be relatively few in number, and to them you can show a different side of yourself - but always with a view to preserving the relationships you already have, and your readiness and ability to create new ones.
I don’t think this is a terribly new concept to anyone with basic observational skills and who has spent any time reflecting on how to deal with other people in general. Where I think most people hit the wall very hard is knowing what to do with that information.
For men in a competitive social environment, whether it’s at a bar, in a business meeting, or even in a sufficiently large group in private, the lowest level of skill is to simply try to out-compete everyone individually in a straightforward dominance competition. Guys at this level think of social interactions as a zero sum game where you always have to one-up the person in front of you. You are a one-man army fighting on all fronts against potential competitors. The kind of people who remain at this level for any period of time are usually very self-centered, short-term-oriented people, or people who have identified something very weak about themselves and are afraid that others will take advantage of it.
There are several problems with this. The first one is that if you have any sort of varied social life, you will not be the established ‘alpha’ in at least a good portion of the social situations you find yourself in. In this case, you are setting yourself up for trouble – your one-man army is walking straight into a well-defended position where your ‘opponents’ have had all the time in the world to establish and fortify it against an invader. When someone does this in a social situation, either they realize this and surrender quickly so that they can be co-opted into the group (usually at a very low position, given that they did such a poor job of managing their approach), or they simply bounce off and are shut out of any opportunity to have a useful interaction where they might be able to establish some influence.
The second problem is that it’s an extremely tiring thing to do for any length of time. Because other people quickly identify you as a threat to themselves, everyone resists you at some level, and people with even weak alliances will put any competition between themselves on hold to rout you out, since you present an easy target that will strengthen both their individual position and the alliance. It’s like a group of dogs growling and squaring up to eachother, and then a cat runs in between, they instantly forget about the fight and go after the cat. Why fight if you can all chase the cat together? You will constantly be dealing with concerted attempts to resist you and throw you back. I guess a lot of those stupid movies, where some guy is surrounded by ten opponents and then proceeds to insult and provoke them, and then dish out some kung-fu when they come at him one at a time with choreographed wild punches, gives guys this impression that this is the ideal modus operandi for dominance in a competitive environment. In reality, you will simply end up copping some amount of punches, and in all likelihood lose altogether.
The third problem is probably the most important one, and that is that you will never be able to take the opportunity to make someone truly like you and want to follow you and become devoted to you, if the gesture required to make that happen goes against your one-upmanship philosophy. If everything is always competitive, any gesture that requires lifting someone else up seems very risky and makes you vulnerable to appearing ‘weak’. But it also means that in any given interaction, the other person will never feel good, and that means that over time they will certainly not move toward a closer or more submissive relationship with you.
I’ve often studied the body language of world leaders, because their image and presentation is something on which a lot of things rest that are difficult to balance – their appeal to everyday people, their appeal to parties seeking an alliance, their ability to appear as a threat to competitors and foes, their ability to negotiate at the level of state politics and then present it in terms that appeal to people who have no idea of what is really involved.
I don’t think most leaders actually do a very good job of that, at all, but because most people in a country are already completely loyal to a party, it doesn’t change very much. Where I think you can get a good estimation of how well a leader does balance those things, is in the viewpoint that ordinary people in other countries have on them.
I don’t want to get the site in trouble with Google, but I’m sure a lot of people are aware of a particular president in Europe who seems to be generally well-respected by a large number of ordinary people around the world. There are numerous popular videos showing him interacting in all sorts of different situations, with men, women, children, and animals, in all kinds of high pressure and low pressure situations. And if you have any understanding of human psychology, you can see that he is routinely successful at establishing a relationship within a few seconds where he maintains a dominant position while validating the person in front of him in a way that makes them feel great, and he almost never gets into a jostling match or confrontation with even the sort of people who pride themselves at that sort of thing. How does he do this?
The answer, in my opinion, is that he is an expert at reading people and identifying almost instantly how that person sees themselves and validates themselves in relation to the world around them.
Everyone believes they are great people, but everyone also believes they are great people for a reason. And that reason is very much tied to what we consider to be our role in life, against which we evaluate ourselves, and by being successful at which we feel fundamentally successful. You cannot be a flight attendant or a waiter without valuing the role of attending to people’s needs and making them comfortable. You cannot be a police officer without valuing the role of defending and protecting others. You cannot be a teacher without valuing the role of developing people and enhancing their capabilities. You cannot be a father or mother without valuing the respective roles that you will have to play in taking care of, protecting, and developing your children. You cannot be a leader without valuing the role of developing a mission and bringing people together around that mission.
And it goes to a more fundamental level as well - you can't be a good-natured person without valuing diplomacy and conflict-resolution, you can't be a competitive person without valuing strength, aggression, and perseverance, you can't be a principled person without valuing standing up against what you don't like. You can't be a girl without valuing the sincere admiration of a man who understands you and enjoys all the pleasant attributes of female nature, nor can you be a man without valuing the admiration of a woman who understands what a man really is and enjoys all the positive dimensions of his masculinity.
What makes someone very successful in one-on-one interactions, no matter whether they are dealing with a world leader or a random person on the street, whether they are in a highly competitive environment or a relaxed social one, is to quickly identify what values another person associates with their own identity, and reflecting to them a validation of it.
One of the reasons this works so well is that you don’t necessarily have to establish who you are in relation to them, since in that moment, you are merely a reflection of what they value about themselves. This means you don’t have to get them to submit to or accept your dominance of the interaction, which is very very difficult with someone who might have little idea of who you are and what you might do with that position. And it also works because is very difficult to separate validation of your core self from its source, and thus disarms people who are emotionally confrontational.
In seduction, deep diving is essentially this – bringing out the values and concepts that a girl has about herself, and especially her core or potential self as opposed to the self that she has to maintain every day, and validating them.
Deep diving, in my opinion, begins from the moment you meet, even if it starts off not very deep, and gets deeper as time goes on. As soon as the first interaction begins, you want to quickly identify the most unique things about her, preferably about her personality, but also physical or style-related things that would have required work or choice on her part to maintain – since this is of course an indication that it’s something she really values.
As the interaction goes on, you want to go deeper, into her core personality traits and interests, and then even deeper toward the things she privately values that most people around her might not be aware of. Always moving along a path led by the golden question: what kind of girl are you really? And all this time, you want to engage her, with your words but most of all with your body language, showing her that those things appeal to you at a deep level.
To do that well, you have to come across neutral as to your own agenda, or at least driven by something very natural and organic, directed by your curiosity and spontaneous engagement with the things you are validating, like a mirror in which people see the things they enjoy seeing in themselves. And this goes back to all my earlier points: if you are trying to be competitive, and you are trying to one-up every interaction, and you are trying to force a dominant or controlling frame that establishes your authority and point of view, you cannot be that mirror. You must be tranquil, unreactive, warm and personal, as sincere as you can be, and in that moment you must see the other person not as a tool to get what you want, but as someone who is developing along a certain path along which they have already accrued some success, and have the potential to accrue much more success, and who, by developing that way, pleases the world around them, including yourself.
And this also means that, to establish good relationships fast, your body language must be on point - solid but reassuring, showing no anxiety, fear, or aggression, open and welcoming, like the Good King who knows exactly where to put everyone so that they can thrive and be successful.
In doing that, it’s not hard to seduce a woman or at least make her feel very pleased to have met you, to establish good relationships with all sorts of people above you, below you, people who are temperamentally aggressive and people who are temperamentally passive, competitive opponents or teammates, men and women, and every creature on earth which wants to reach success according to its own concept of value.
There are always your foes who will try to take you down no matter what, who should in an ideal world be relatively few in number, and to them you can show a different side of yourself - but always with a view to preserving the relationships you already have, and your readiness and ability to create new ones.