Neal,
Not trying to be mean here, just trying to help you see truths. Songbird and I asked you directly what sort of real-world results you have seen from pursuing your paradigm, and your answers are
highly evasive, to the point of being nonsensical. If you were
actually seeing good results, you would simply share these results with us as opposed to trying some Jedi hand-waving intended to distract us from the reality that
your theories are not working for you.
(By the way, there is tremendous precedent in nature for the exact opposite to your paradigm. Eggs do not swim towards sperm. If you ejaculate into a woman and your sperm were to decide to play it cool and just wait until the egg smashes into them, she will not get pregnant. By the time the egg would reach anywhere near them, it is dead, and chances are so are they.)
You speak of inventors. You're actually speaking to one. I've invented several technologies which did not exist before. Nothing as revoultionary as Edison, but nevertheless, new technological devices. So I know a thing or two about making new discoveries and inventions.
Yeah, I actually shunned
formal education - I'm in some ways as hardheaded as you. But my dad had a collection of electrical engineering text books and electronics repair/hobbyist magazines, and
BEST BELIEVE I had my nose in those
hard from the age of 7, just about as soon as I could read well enough to begin to wrap my little head around it. Because even at that young age I had a sense for the obvious fact that, once you get past fire and stone wheels,
all great feats of discovery and invention are predicated on a deep knowledge of prior discoveries and inventions. The computer you are reading this on is literally the product of
several thousand years of scientific investigation!
When I learned to build and design circuits,
the first ones I built and designed were nothing new. They were everyday things like power supplies, light sequencers, and amplifiers - things practicing engineers create all the time and would regard as rather basic. But I cut my teeth on these
because I had to acquire a deep understanding of what was already there so that I would not
waste my time re-inventing all the basic building blocks.
What are the chances I'd have invented anything new if I had never read all those engineering books and got a few soldering iron burns putting together circuits every engineer already knew about?
ZERO.
Unfortunately, I did not apply the same pragmatic approach to learning how to interact with females, and
I paid for it dearly. Like you, I thought I somehow just magically knew everything about them and nobody could tell me shit. FUCK ME, what a waste of years.
Trying to find some revolutionary new theory of seduction without even having gotten your dick wet in a pussy, is like a caveman trying to invent a smartphone without any knowledge of linear algebra, matrix math, vector calculus, numerical systems, radix math, physics, electromagnetism, circuit theory, relativity, wave propagation, microcontroller design, digital signal processing, software engineering, UI design, cryptography, telephony, surface mount technology, microelectronics fabrication, optics, materials science, electrochemistry, organic chemistry, or polymer chemistry.
NOT GONNA HAPPEN. Not even with the brain of Einstein or Ung-yong.
My sincere advice to you as someone who has the intelligence, discipline and experience to
actually be able to invent new stuff, is to begin by admitting that you know jack shit about women and diligently applying the advice of men who bed hot women consistently. Put up reports here for feedback and pay attention to what experienced guys tell you and apply their advice. Unless you're
severely handicapped socially, if you are diligent with this you
will become more attractive to women and get closer to sleeping with them. When you start getting to sleep with them, you will realize that
you were setting your sights too low in thinking it's fine to just attract but not fuck them.
Once you have had your dick in several hundred decently attractive women you didn't have to pay, you will then
understand women far better than you could ever possibly understand them as a virgin, and you will be in a
much better place to develop your own revolutionary new ways of attracting them.
THEN you can be the Newton who
already knows about planetary motion, or the Einstein who
already understands the Lorentz transformation, or the Edison who
already understands electromagnetism, or the Wozniac who
has a workbench full of electronic parts he already understands.
(But I'm willing to bet that by the time you've laid 50 women your mental model will have evolved so greatly that you will be laughing at yourself for ever having held onto the beliefs you currently have.)
I think your main problem at this point is that you have a lot of foolish pride.
You simply can't admit that you're not the hot-shot guru who knows everything about women, or who is genius enough to figure it all out all by himself. The genius who thinks he doesn't need existing knowledge is actually a
fool.
The attitude you presently have will get you nowhere.
I want you to read
this report about my trying to approach a Nigerian girl working in a department store in November. I totally fucked up and made a fool of myself in front of her and some nearby people. I didn't publicly document the others but most of my approaches around that time did not go very well. But I had to suffer that failure and admit my incompetency in order to learn from it.
Now read
this report from last month. I've actually done a lot better than this before, but not consistently and not from cold approach in a shopping mall. Look at how much more open the girl was. That is partly because practice has made me less nervous, but also because I applied things I learned from other guys. With a few more tweaks I probably could have slept with her. If I had've done what Seppuku suggested, I'd have at least gotten her on a date. Next time I encounter that situation I know how to handle it, in part
because I learned how from someone who sleeps with 20 or more new girls every year, some half his age I might add. It would take me
so much longer to learn the same things by stumbling around blindly on my own rather than seek knowledge from others.
I suggest that unless you are content with spending the rest of your life doing push-ups in front of 12 year olds instead of attracting and sleeping with women, that you adapt a similar mentality.
Phoenix
p.s., I wouldn't make much of the People You May Know feed. You are blindly speculating on an algorithm that is kept secret and which probably even changes from time to time. Many things other than her viewing your profile could be factored in, such as location, school, location or school being common with 1st or 2nd degree contacts, 2nd or 3rd degree connectivity, her and/or your friend count, your own viewing habits, a pseudorandom number generator, and others. I would not take seeing a girl in this feed as even remotely reliable evidence that she has ever visited your profile.
