For background, I'm an incel. Have been for years. I hired a few dating coaches and they suggested that I stay away from daygame for the moment and optimise my dating profile, get lots of dates and build up some positive experiences first. I ended up going on over 15 first dates over the past 9 months with nothing to show for it. I got laid off and I'm so angry with everything in my life that I've momentarily given up with women (I used to be a reasonable earner and fail with women so I don't think that being laid off will make me less attractive but who needs more rejection and stress while being laid off and frustrated..). I'm soon going to stop coaching because I'm not getting results.
Anyway, whenever my coaches and I went over my progress, they would analyze my dates and find out what went wrong. It was stuff like "you lost her because she opened up to you and you changed the subject" or "you spent too long on this subject and that's where you lost her". It made me think that the bar is extremely high. I tightened everything up so that women wouldn't have an easy reason to reject me and, more importantly, my coaches couldn't highlight anything. I still got rejected but this time for nonsense reasons.
I was discussing with some friends recently and it struck me that they did a lot wrong but still ended up with forgiveness from the woman, had second chances etc.
-I know a guy who screwed up kissing a woman in public on a date. She called it out as awkward but he still got more dates. I've kissed in public before and I'm confident that I escalated well and she woman enjoyed it at the time, but the woman never wanted to see me again.
-in general, guys I know have kissed in public and gotten more dates. Every time I've kissed in public, i've been rejected in the future and never got a further date . My coaches confirmed that it was a bad idea and even GC guidelines seem to say it, so I stopped. But why did it work for these guys?
-I've learned that a good date is one where the man is leading, both in conversation and the physical activities of the date, and the way that one can tell that it's a good date is that the woman is complying and seems to be enjoying it, and investing into it, possibly by just sharing information about herself. By this measure, guys I know have had bad dates but gotten more dates with the same woman. But how can a suboptimal date or poor game ever get you a good result with a woman?
So basically it seems like whatever 'game' is, the game that I'm playing isn't the same as the one the other guys are playing. It's like they're playing on normal difficulty and I'm playing on heaven or hell (one hit and it's game over) difficulty. I know that I have awful fundamentals and I can't really judge how good these guys' fundamentals are. Is it true then that game isn't really so important and you proceed or don't to the next stage of the courtship completely at the woman's discretion? Is 'game' closer to a game of luck or chance than a game of skill or ability? Is what we learn from books, the Internet, GC etc less about how to get girls and more about how to not screw up with girls who want to be gotten? Basically, are our results much less in our control than us game nerds would like to believe?
Anyway, whenever my coaches and I went over my progress, they would analyze my dates and find out what went wrong. It was stuff like "you lost her because she opened up to you and you changed the subject" or "you spent too long on this subject and that's where you lost her". It made me think that the bar is extremely high. I tightened everything up so that women wouldn't have an easy reason to reject me and, more importantly, my coaches couldn't highlight anything. I still got rejected but this time for nonsense reasons.
I was discussing with some friends recently and it struck me that they did a lot wrong but still ended up with forgiveness from the woman, had second chances etc.
-I know a guy who screwed up kissing a woman in public on a date. She called it out as awkward but he still got more dates. I've kissed in public before and I'm confident that I escalated well and she woman enjoyed it at the time, but the woman never wanted to see me again.
-in general, guys I know have kissed in public and gotten more dates. Every time I've kissed in public, i've been rejected in the future and never got a further date . My coaches confirmed that it was a bad idea and even GC guidelines seem to say it, so I stopped. But why did it work for these guys?
-I've learned that a good date is one where the man is leading, both in conversation and the physical activities of the date, and the way that one can tell that it's a good date is that the woman is complying and seems to be enjoying it, and investing into it, possibly by just sharing information about herself. By this measure, guys I know have had bad dates but gotten more dates with the same woman. But how can a suboptimal date or poor game ever get you a good result with a woman?
So basically it seems like whatever 'game' is, the game that I'm playing isn't the same as the one the other guys are playing. It's like they're playing on normal difficulty and I'm playing on heaven or hell (one hit and it's game over) difficulty. I know that I have awful fundamentals and I can't really judge how good these guys' fundamentals are. Is it true then that game isn't really so important and you proceed or don't to the next stage of the courtship completely at the woman's discretion? Is 'game' closer to a game of luck or chance than a game of skill or ability? Is what we learn from books, the Internet, GC etc less about how to get girls and more about how to not screw up with girls who want to be gotten? Basically, are our results much less in our control than us game nerds would like to believe?