Is stereotyping girls based on cliques and background a bad idea?

[Indian Race Troll (IRT)]

I tend to look at and treat girls differently based on the type of girls they are and was wondering if this is a good or bad idea. From my own life experience I have found that girls do differ based on cultures and even what clique they are a part of. Back when I was in college, I found that sorority girls were by far the most rude and cold group of girls on the planet while foreign exchange students and girls that were nature loving were very nice girls. Overtime I have noticed a trend when it comes to women which makes me treat them differently and even see them differently on the first encounter.

1. American women (especially white) are much colder and stuck up than women of other nationalities, they are also very fake and two faced compared to other kinds of women. An American woman will act like she likes you one day and then the next day pretend like she doesn't even know you.

2. White and Asian women are on average not as outgoing or open to being touched early as Black and Latina women are.

3. College girls are very flaky and not that direct about whether or not they like you.

4. I have found that blondes on average are much more shallow and vain compared to other kinds of women, the hot ones are usually total ice queens. A PUA I talked to has told me that he has received the lowest response rates from blondes he has cold approached compared to all other kinds of women, maybe women that dye their hair blonde are shallow.

Just this experience alone has made me generalize women a lot when I approach them or interact with them, is it a bad idea?

 

[trashKENNUT]

Proactivity,

Stereotype or any labeling is a good thing for analyzing but not good when you start treating people like shit. You can check out Chase's "Black and White" thinking. He will help you there.

Anyway,

1. American women (especially white) are much colder and stuck up than women of other nationalities, they are also very fake and two faced compared to other kinds of women. An American woman will act like she likes you one day and then the next day pretend like she doesn't even know you.

I heard American Women are more "stronger". Stronger i sense is that of frame control.

2. White and Asian women are on average not as outgoing or open to being touched early as Black and Latina women are.

Nope, Asian women are open to being touch early on, too. White women as well. I think what you mean here is being perceived as cool, sassy and fun.

3. College girls are very flaky and not that direct about whether or not they like you.

True but this could be a lot of reasons.

4. I have found that blondes on average are much more shallow and vain compared to other kinds of women, the hot ones are usually total ice queens. A PUA I talked to has told me that he has received the lowest response rates from blondes he has cold approached compared to all other kinds of women, maybe women that dye their hair blonde are shallow.

It depends on the dating market. A blonde who is deemed worthy because she have guys hitting her up left and right. She definitely be more colder. This is true across all continents, from what i learn and heard. If a women from a certain group is deemed valuable, she will be more choosy even if individually, she looks like a trainwreck, but only because she's blonde.

Zac