- Joined
- Nov 20, 2012
- Messages
- 550
If you haven't read the article on the Law of Least Effort, I first advise you to look here and take a read before responding to this post.
I have been testing out the limits of the law of least effort, as I believe it is a very powerful tool all-around for social situations. I have always detested looking try-hard in any meaning of the word, and I often try and hide my efforts to do things from other people. Right now I am trying to make it less so that I am avoiding that people see my efforts, and more of a genuine thing occurs where I exert less effort and get my way with things.
Is it better or worse to exert more effort, or to not care about getting your way in order to not expend more effort? There are often times when I simply don't care about an outcome, and I'll just naturally expend less effort to achieve that outcome. Sometimes I regret this, and it makes me think that there is definitely a floor when it comes to expending less effort. So I reworked it in my mind that expending less effort is only valuable when I don't exactly care about the outcome, and expending a lot when I do care about the outcome.
Quickly realizing that it wouldn't work, I have now settled on the fact, that with expending effort, I need to expend just the right balance. But what exactly is that balance, and how would this correspond with the law of least effort, where the least amount is supposed to be used? The law seems to be simply a face-value law. Look at the sexy guy dressed to kill; he's obviously trying hard, why else would he be wearing nice clothes? Or have that sexy haircut? The soccer player who has been training for years and years makes scoring a simply chip shot extremely easy, but it took him forever to cultivate that ability. This makes me think that the law of least effort isn't entirely dependent upon expending the least effort; more effort is obviously needed to gain the ability to use less. Therefore, the law of least effort simply lies in the present, and in appearances; as Chase states in the article.
But, as I love to dive in deep to concept, why does this law of least effort only seem to apply to appearances, and not everything? This law is a lot deeper than simple effort. I believe now that it's nearly impossible to go through a period of success without expending a lot of effort, at least at first. Sure, I could hide all my efforts, and try to appear effortless, but I believe that it is hindering my progress. I'd rather rapidly pursue my goals for all to see than cover them up and use excuses in an effort to show less effort. I suppose I may have taken this law too seriously. I hated showing other people I had effort towards things before reading about it, but I took it to a new level without much thought.
Any comments or questions would be appreciated. If this post seems extremely scatterbrained, its because that's the way I am; my mind goes off in all sorts of crazy directions during typing, and I could sit here and type for hours and constantly argue with myself if I didn't decide to end the post.
I have been testing out the limits of the law of least effort, as I believe it is a very powerful tool all-around for social situations. I have always detested looking try-hard in any meaning of the word, and I often try and hide my efforts to do things from other people. Right now I am trying to make it less so that I am avoiding that people see my efforts, and more of a genuine thing occurs where I exert less effort and get my way with things.
Is it better or worse to exert more effort, or to not care about getting your way in order to not expend more effort? There are often times when I simply don't care about an outcome, and I'll just naturally expend less effort to achieve that outcome. Sometimes I regret this, and it makes me think that there is definitely a floor when it comes to expending less effort. So I reworked it in my mind that expending less effort is only valuable when I don't exactly care about the outcome, and expending a lot when I do care about the outcome.
Quickly realizing that it wouldn't work, I have now settled on the fact, that with expending effort, I need to expend just the right balance. But what exactly is that balance, and how would this correspond with the law of least effort, where the least amount is supposed to be used? The law seems to be simply a face-value law. Look at the sexy guy dressed to kill; he's obviously trying hard, why else would he be wearing nice clothes? Or have that sexy haircut? The soccer player who has been training for years and years makes scoring a simply chip shot extremely easy, but it took him forever to cultivate that ability. This makes me think that the law of least effort isn't entirely dependent upon expending the least effort; more effort is obviously needed to gain the ability to use less. Therefore, the law of least effort simply lies in the present, and in appearances; as Chase states in the article.
But, as I love to dive in deep to concept, why does this law of least effort only seem to apply to appearances, and not everything? This law is a lot deeper than simple effort. I believe now that it's nearly impossible to go through a period of success without expending a lot of effort, at least at first. Sure, I could hide all my efforts, and try to appear effortless, but I believe that it is hindering my progress. I'd rather rapidly pursue my goals for all to see than cover them up and use excuses in an effort to show less effort. I suppose I may have taken this law too seriously. I hated showing other people I had effort towards things before reading about it, but I took it to a new level without much thought.
Any comments or questions would be appreciated. If this post seems extremely scatterbrained, its because that's the way I am; my mind goes off in all sorts of crazy directions during typing, and I could sit here and type for hours and constantly argue with myself if I didn't decide to end the post.