- Joined
- Dec 25, 2012
- Messages
- 1,124
In one of his posts, ray_zorse briefly mentioned something like, "chase's style is geared towards being a generalist..." This got me thinking... I'd like to explore the idea of being a "generalist" or a man that can get along well with pretty much any type of women or at least a broad range. Pretty sure what GC teaches is just that, but something hasn't clicked. I seem to vibe better with a certain type of girl (artsy, nature lover, closet nerd) and that means a smaller pool of pussy to swim in than I'd like.
This weekend I met a girl whom I had excellent chemistry with, and then ended up getting intimate with her the same night.
Contrast that with a girl a few weekends ago whom I got a number from and then set up a date with the next day (who was also excited to meet up), only to have only platonic conversation with and then both part ways disappointed.
Pretty sure both girls were physically attracted to me and liked that I was bold enough to ask them out and lead the interaction.
There wasn't too much flirting with the girl this weekend, but we vibed on the topic of spirituality which I have explored a lot which perhaps was very valuable in her eyes.
The other girl, well I don't think we had much in common other than we were attracted to each other physically.
I think there are many ways to milk this cat. There's also a lot of nuances during both interactions beside strictly value that matter. (I think if I were at the park at night with with the girl I didn't get intimate with, things would have gotten hot :} )
Buuuuuut, in terms of value, is being sexy, socially aware and able to lead a girl to intimacy the way to being a generalist?
Some girls I just do not vibe with, but am attracted to physically... Seems like I should work on my sexual vibe. And I'm sure if I understood more about them we could also vibe well in other ways which I'd like to learn to do. What do you think?
I feel a strange feeling that the answer lies in the advice given in Blonde Bombshell thread (Be the man through and through they desire), or in The Guide To Geting Hot Girls (Of Any Type) thread.
This weekend I met a girl whom I had excellent chemistry with, and then ended up getting intimate with her the same night.
Contrast that with a girl a few weekends ago whom I got a number from and then set up a date with the next day (who was also excited to meet up), only to have only platonic conversation with and then both part ways disappointed.
Pretty sure both girls were physically attracted to me and liked that I was bold enough to ask them out and lead the interaction.
There wasn't too much flirting with the girl this weekend, but we vibed on the topic of spirituality which I have explored a lot which perhaps was very valuable in her eyes.
The other girl, well I don't think we had much in common other than we were attracted to each other physically.
I think there are many ways to milk this cat. There's also a lot of nuances during both interactions beside strictly value that matter. (I think if I were at the park at night with with the girl I didn't get intimate with, things would have gotten hot :} )
Buuuuuut, in terms of value, is being sexy, socially aware and able to lead a girl to intimacy the way to being a generalist?
Some girls I just do not vibe with, but am attracted to physically... Seems like I should work on my sexual vibe. And I'm sure if I understood more about them we could also vibe well in other ways which I'd like to learn to do. What do you think?
I feel a strange feeling that the answer lies in the advice given in Blonde Bombshell thread (Be the man through and through they desire), or in The Guide To Geting Hot Girls (Of Any Type) thread.