- Joined
- Sep 9, 2013
- Messages
- 311
This one has been bothering me for a while now. Well, it seems like we are back at level one again!
What I mean is, we are basically reaching the same conclusions as the general consensus.
For example, Chase says that we can get even the most beautiful girls easily if we set the right frames, yet he also points out in several articles that the higher the value of a girl, the less she puts herself out there.
In a forum post, he even mentions that the girls who are from really good families tend to be proper, and tend to have very few partners.
Also, in one of Drexel’s forum threads someone mentions that ‘that is what makes them relationship material to begin with’ as a response to a comment that says some girls take too long to go to bed no matter what you do.
In addition to that, Chase has a whole article devoted to why he does not date girls who club, drink or party any more. The general social conditioning is pretty much the same, that those girls are not good.
The general social conditioning is something like ‘girls who sleep with lesser number of men are good, and vice versa’. We do not incline so much toward that mentality, but the overall conclusion is almost the same, only not for the same reason. Our thinking goes more like ‘the girls who sleep with less men are good relationship materials because loyalty decreases as the number of partner increases’.
So basically, we are reaching the same conclusions as the popular beliefs, but not for the same reasons, right? We are just not judgmental enough to divide girls as ‘good’ or ‘bad’, and are exploring the real reasons by going a lot deeper. Is that it?
What I mean is, we are basically reaching the same conclusions as the general consensus.
For example, Chase says that we can get even the most beautiful girls easily if we set the right frames, yet he also points out in several articles that the higher the value of a girl, the less she puts herself out there.
In a forum post, he even mentions that the girls who are from really good families tend to be proper, and tend to have very few partners.
Also, in one of Drexel’s forum threads someone mentions that ‘that is what makes them relationship material to begin with’ as a response to a comment that says some girls take too long to go to bed no matter what you do.
In addition to that, Chase has a whole article devoted to why he does not date girls who club, drink or party any more. The general social conditioning is pretty much the same, that those girls are not good.
The general social conditioning is something like ‘girls who sleep with lesser number of men are good, and vice versa’. We do not incline so much toward that mentality, but the overall conclusion is almost the same, only not for the same reason. Our thinking goes more like ‘the girls who sleep with less men are good relationship materials because loyalty decreases as the number of partner increases’.
So basically, we are reaching the same conclusions as the popular beliefs, but not for the same reasons, right? We are just not judgmental enough to divide girls as ‘good’ or ‘bad’, and are exploring the real reasons by going a lot deeper. Is that it?