I’ve been reading a lot of this supported by science hub jub recently and I just can’t agree with it. I have some sort of absolutist bias, that bias triples when it comes to Reddit.
You remember that one episode in futurama from when you were a kid? The one where fry was part of the cycle being run by the one chick?
maybe that’s what she is imagining maybe that’s where we all are going towards, a deeper entrenched methodology towards how to do things, these ideas are a threat to our primordial brains and so I feel against it just through.
Or perhaps it’s because I’m a beta, an alpha and an omega. I’m sure we’ve heard these ideologies discussed to lengths before, I wonder if all that and the hierarchies have a response to the article.
Anyways what are the giant buzzwords in this article using? Drugs, high, addiction. Dollars to doughnuts the person who wrote this article is a consistent user of heroin and probably does a lot of drugs.
doesn’t discard what she is writing but makes me sceptical of it.
cheers
Must0
The key thing to learn from women talking about dating, etc -
is not necessarily that what they say is true - but their areas of concern.
So from a Player POV, these chicks are telling us that they're really concerned about a) falling in love, but more importantly, b) losing control.
So one she wants to maintain control, but in her past she's lost control - easily.
With that type of knowledge, the player designs his approaches to play along those lines.
What happens when you give her the illusion of control?
For low level players, this is stuff like, "would you like go out on Friday or Saturday".
But when you start dealing with chicks past the rudimentary stuff, it will be subtle things like echoing their thoughts right back at them.
"We're doing such and such, but I don't want you to lose control"
Just me saying something like that, her guard comes down, the trust comes in more - and guess what - she's more likely to lose control with me, rather than maintain it.
When guys start with pick up, especially back in the day, the "what" they say was so important.
Changing conversational topics from the boring "what's your name, where you are you from" - gets better results.
As they got better, the focus shifted from the "what" to the "how". How you deliver a line is far more important than what you say.
So now, you can just make eye contact, and slowly, somewhat loudly, with a deeper voice say "Hello" and not say anything.
But after that - you start to look at what's going on underneath the hood - what are her internal motivations, and how does she express them.
Because the point of all of this is to cut through the noise of modern life, the culture, the politics, the religion, and get to that very essential man to woman communication.
WIA
