- Joined
- Jul 5, 2013
- Messages
- 182
Re: wouldnt it make sense to make AIDS testing mandatory and tatoo people infect
His premises I was talking about in the statement of mine you quote:
These premises support people getting tested more, not making people get tattoos on their genitals. Obviously on the rare occasion that someone is lying to you about having HIV who you are about to have sex with, a tattoo would reveal their lie. But I doubt someone who is willing to go that far into depravity would have a problem covering up the tattoo with makeup or with any dozen of other methods of concealment. So the tattoo would really only be "effective" on the people who wouldn't lie to potential partners about having a deadly infectious disease in the first place.
mrre said:Oskar said:I fail to see a logical connection between them and your thesis that dick tattoos would help reduce HIV infections. These banal facts do not support your argument pro dick tattoos.
I think it's pretty straight forward no? People will be like "Hey, you didn't tell me you had AIDS!" Or do you think any sane person would engage in sex with someone infected on purpose? A kantian moral argument would work better here not an argument based on effectiveness. It's clear that it would reduce transmission rates.
His premises I was talking about in the statement of mine you quote:
1:most people who get stds get them in relationships,(in beds)not in dark alleyways.
2:most people don't know their status..and 40 percent of infected people don't know they are infected.
3:this measure will drastically reduce the number of infected people,sure some people will still infect others in alleyways,but as with any sti....the total number of infected people in a population is a big factor on how easy it is to become infected.
in other words...in a region where one out of ten people have aids,catching aids is obviously easier than catching it in a region where only one out of a hundred have it.
These premises support people getting tested more, not making people get tattoos on their genitals. Obviously on the rare occasion that someone is lying to you about having HIV who you are about to have sex with, a tattoo would reveal their lie. But I doubt someone who is willing to go that far into depravity would have a problem covering up the tattoo with makeup or with any dozen of other methods of concealment. So the tattoo would really only be "effective" on the people who wouldn't lie to potential partners about having a deadly infectious disease in the first place.