Nar 2.8
Mach 2.0
Psycho 1.1
Mach 2.0
Psycho 1.1
I have used such tests on myself and others. Generally:
All the advanced guys are very high on Machiavelianism (which is not a considered a disorder, but a trait) and moderately high on Narcissism. The first is simply because they have a very high understanding of actual social dynamics, which may not be pretty, but there is nothing "dark" about just understanding something. I believe the latter is simply because such tests do not distinguish between fake and real confidence as most academics are just chodes who are unable to see the difference.
Also such tests have a big drawback - they do not distinguish between how you treat your TRIBE - friends, beloved ones, family in contrast to just random strangers. Which also because they are made by cucks who fail to realize that, as we evolved in tribes of maybe 150-300 people, most people just can't have deep, meaningful relations to a substantially larger number.
So do take the results with a grain of salt.
I just think that putting yourself first is extremely attractive even if is frustrating to them, the moment in any part of the seduction (other than giving her an orgasm) you stop putting yourself first, you are a bit fucked..
For instance, by our definitions every single viking was A) A psychopath and B) An alcoholic.
It was an entire civilization based around raiding, pillaging, murder, rape and abduction (as well as copious alcohol use).
Does it make any sense at all, from a diagnostic perspective, to say "all vikings were psychopaths"? Doesn't that call into question the validity of the term "psychopath" or it's label as a disorder, if all the people in that society follow those norms?
Who is "our". I think you mean by your definition. Psychology takes into account culture and what they consider normal. So no they wouldn't label vikings as psychopathic because despite vikings being ruthless to everyone else they still had much care and empathy and altruism towards their in-group(other Vikings) and that is very uncharacteristic of psychopathy.
I am always getting shit! from women that love me, they say "you are a,narcissist" "you are selfish" "you are in love with yourself", "your heart is made of rock" the thing is when they fall super hard in love with me, no exception, and they have options of other men, they sill "love" me and "Can't get over me" and is very simple reason, not sure if is all "confidence".... I just think that putting yourself first is extremely attractive even if is frustrating to them, the moment in any part of the seduction (other than giving her an orgasm) you stop putting yourself first, you are a bit fucked...
The DSM doesn't have, to my knowledge a disclaimer that says "applies primarily (or exclusively) to western industrialized societies".
Also I said the opposite of what you claim I said, I said Psychology should take into context, but that it brings up all kinds of difficult questions to judge ex. Is it good or bad to live like a viking (murdering, raping) if it leads to your civilization controlling more resources than any other on the planet?
Or for a more immediate question, if the attention span of all people under 35 is so decimated today (from tech etc.), and then if say 50% or more of the population would be considered to have "ADHD", what then is the diagnostic value of "ADHD", that is once it becomes the new normal
The ICD has very similar diagnostic criteria and it's used everywhere else in the world.
They do take things into context. It's not Psychology's job to judge what is good or bad, rather, they study behaviors and mental processes.
A diagnosis of ADHD is so much more than a short attention span. I don't know where you got that number from.
You are right; this test seems inaccurate.M: 4.7/5
N: 4.8/5
P: 3.4/5
Damn. I dont think the Psychopathy is accurate, I’m very empathetic. The other stuff maybe but I doubt its that high for real