- Joined
- Jul 17, 2013
- Messages
- 1,554
Hello friends!
Reviewing some of the coaching I've been lucky enough to receive through this forum, I've realized that I need to execute a "mindset switch" if my learning path is to line up with the suggestions here.
The main problem is that I've accumulated some data points that seem to point toward a different conclusion from the theoretical material on the main site. Judging by how effective the advice here has been for me, though, I'm 95% certain that it's my own interpretation of that particular subset of my experiences that is at fault.
That's why I'm asking for your help to lead me through it.
I am a great believer in the value of practical experience and shortly after I discovered this site, I resolved to go out "into the field" and attempt to put into practice what I had learned. I ventured into the streets of my city and started cold-approaching women in May 2013, a month or two before I ever posted anything in this forum, equipped with the information I'd read in the Girls Chase articles.
When I started out on that journey, I had a couple of advantages:
I've never had trouble with the idea that women are sexual creatures; I've never been a "white knight" or had a false image of virginal, angelic, pedestalized ladies. That's not the issue here. My problem is not that extreme.
But when I read the first few of Chase's articles, before venturing into the field, it opened my eyes as to what is effective, and what is not effective, in generating buy-in among women to the idea of romantic involvement with a man. That's what I'm talking about. What will get her hooked.
So, as with learning any new skill, I decided to take the teacher's word for it. Accept the premise of the articles, go out there and put out the impression that I am not pursuing a relationship, just expressing my sexual attraction in a socially astute manner.
I was a bit rocky on the first few interactions, obviously; we'll discard them from the sample population. But once I got a bit of momentum going and learned to open direct, build rapport, and ask promptly and confidently for a date—well, I got a few positive responses actually, but here were the grounds for declining that I heard, again and again and again, from the women who appeared attracted, but said no:
Once I'd gotten over the shock of supposedly self-reliant, feminist, American women permitting their menfolk to express approval or disapproval of their intention to have coffee with a man, I started thinking. And here are the thoughts that went through my mind: "Excuse me? I'm trying to move toward fast sex, like Chase taught me, and here you are using your current relationship status as an obstacle? I didn't ask and I don't want to know. I'm not pursuing a relationship here, you know."
And then I started forming conclusions, as the human brain is wont to do, from the data that was coming in. The idea started forming in my mind that these women could only conceive of sexual activity within a relationship framework. That's why they were turning me down; they couldn't have me as a provider, because that position in their lives was already occupied, so they were dismissing me altogether. Consequently, I concluded that that was the only context in which they could consider romantic or sexual involvement. They simply didn't take lovers.
So I start posting on the forum here, and time and time again, I am told that I have the wrong mindset, I need to push fast toward sex. Be a lover, not a provider. Trouble is, a lot of my previous data points have directed me elsewhere.
Please tell me what I am missing here... like I said, I'm the type of guy who needs to be led through step-by-step, but when I finally get it, the knowledge is all the more robust for the effort that went into getting it established.
Thank you!
-Marty
Reviewing some of the coaching I've been lucky enough to receive through this forum, I've realized that I need to execute a "mindset switch" if my learning path is to line up with the suggestions here.
The main problem is that I've accumulated some data points that seem to point toward a different conclusion from the theoretical material on the main site. Judging by how effective the advice here has been for me, though, I'm 95% certain that it's my own interpretation of that particular subset of my experiences that is at fault.
That's why I'm asking for your help to lead me through it.
I am a great believer in the value of practical experience and shortly after I discovered this site, I resolved to go out "into the field" and attempt to put into practice what I had learned. I ventured into the streets of my city and started cold-approaching women in May 2013, a month or two before I ever posted anything in this forum, equipped with the information I'd read in the Girls Chase articles.
When I started out on that journey, I had a couple of advantages:
- I have never been prone to being friendzoned... if that means doing buddy-buddy activities with women I'm attracted to, or getting involved in long conversations with them and third parties present simultaneously, or groups, I simply don't do it, naturally, and never have done
- I have a natural self-assurance and air of authority and a quirky, nonconformist, highly individualistic manner
- I am very slow to appreciate concepts intuitively and need to be led through the reasoning verbally, step-by-step
- I do not have a natural grasp of social nuances (or don't trust my intuition enough) and can miss obvious-seeming signals
- I have formed good habits with my body language and speaking manner by "faking it till I make it", to the extent that these now seem natural
- I can now tell reliably when a woman is attracted to me (regardless of the words she speaks or any obstacles to capitalizing on that attraction) and when she is not
I've never had trouble with the idea that women are sexual creatures; I've never been a "white knight" or had a false image of virginal, angelic, pedestalized ladies. That's not the issue here. My problem is not that extreme.
But when I read the first few of Chase's articles, before venturing into the field, it opened my eyes as to what is effective, and what is not effective, in generating buy-in among women to the idea of romantic involvement with a man. That's what I'm talking about. What will get her hooked.
So, as with learning any new skill, I decided to take the teacher's word for it. Accept the premise of the articles, go out there and put out the impression that I am not pursuing a relationship, just expressing my sexual attraction in a socially astute manner.
I was a bit rocky on the first few interactions, obviously; we'll discard them from the sample population. But once I got a bit of momentum going and learned to open direct, build rapport, and ask promptly and confidently for a date—well, I got a few positive responses actually, but here were the grounds for declining that I heard, again and again and again, from the women who appeared attracted, but said no:
- "I'd love to, but my boyfriend wouldn't like it"; or...
- "I'd love to, but my husband wouldn't like it".
Once I'd gotten over the shock of supposedly self-reliant, feminist, American women permitting their menfolk to express approval or disapproval of their intention to have coffee with a man, I started thinking. And here are the thoughts that went through my mind: "Excuse me? I'm trying to move toward fast sex, like Chase taught me, and here you are using your current relationship status as an obstacle? I didn't ask and I don't want to know. I'm not pursuing a relationship here, you know."
And then I started forming conclusions, as the human brain is wont to do, from the data that was coming in. The idea started forming in my mind that these women could only conceive of sexual activity within a relationship framework. That's why they were turning me down; they couldn't have me as a provider, because that position in their lives was already occupied, so they were dismissing me altogether. Consequently, I concluded that that was the only context in which they could consider romantic or sexual involvement. They simply didn't take lovers.
So I start posting on the forum here, and time and time again, I am told that I have the wrong mindset, I need to push fast toward sex. Be a lover, not a provider. Trouble is, a lot of my previous data points have directed me elsewhere.
Please tell me what I am missing here... like I said, I'm the type of guy who needs to be led through step-by-step, but when I finally get it, the knowledge is all the more robust for the effort that went into getting it established.
Thank you!
-Marty