- Joined
- Feb 27, 2014
- Messages
- 288
I was having a conversation with a former wing / natural buddy of mine who said no quality girl would LTR a guy who isn’t 100% financially independent.
I asked a female friend of mine who is attractive and most would consider quality based on her personality and looks, and she said she would never date a guy who isn’t employed. I forget if she mentioned the specifics though.
I know guys and have heard of some guys who are unemployed drug addicts who are banging or in an LTR with an attractive quality girl, so it is technically possible.
I am over 30 years old, so perhaps as the guy is older, it’s more important the guy is employed and possibly also financially independent.
Or maybe it has to do with the girl being older?
I am being partially financially supported by family, which my friend said is not good enough to land a quality girl. I think he might have strong inaccurate beliefs, thoughts?
To specify, my goals are:
1. Laying above average to hot girls.
2. FB above average to hot girls.
3. LTR above average to hot girls.
I think #3 is the one that my friend argues requires full financial independence.
1 and 2 it seems financial independence is less important, but would any girls see that as a deal breaker?
This is assuming the guy has his looks maxed out and has the skill set to seduce the girl properly and generate high attraction.
Simply having a good enough skill set to seduce the woman is sufficient enough to bang them for sure, FB them probably, and I would’ve thought being able to seduce and generate high attraction would be enough to LTR a physically attractive and quality girl even if you’re not 100% financially independent.
Or even more extreme, if you’re unemployed with a good skill set and able to seduce a girl, since love and attraction are emotionally and logical, an LTR should still be feasible even if you’re living off welfare?
To the guys on this forum, what are your thoughts on this?
I asked a female friend of mine who is attractive and most would consider quality based on her personality and looks, and she said she would never date a guy who isn’t employed. I forget if she mentioned the specifics though.
I know guys and have heard of some guys who are unemployed drug addicts who are banging or in an LTR with an attractive quality girl, so it is technically possible.
I am over 30 years old, so perhaps as the guy is older, it’s more important the guy is employed and possibly also financially independent.
Or maybe it has to do with the girl being older?
I am being partially financially supported by family, which my friend said is not good enough to land a quality girl. I think he might have strong inaccurate beliefs, thoughts?
To specify, my goals are:
1. Laying above average to hot girls.
2. FB above average to hot girls.
3. LTR above average to hot girls.
I think #3 is the one that my friend argues requires full financial independence.
1 and 2 it seems financial independence is less important, but would any girls see that as a deal breaker?
This is assuming the guy has his looks maxed out and has the skill set to seduce the girl properly and generate high attraction.
Simply having a good enough skill set to seduce the woman is sufficient enough to bang them for sure, FB them probably, and I would’ve thought being able to seduce and generate high attraction would be enough to LTR a physically attractive and quality girl even if you’re not 100% financially independent.
Or even more extreme, if you’re unemployed with a good skill set and able to seduce a girl, since love and attraction are emotionally and logical, an LTR should still be feasible even if you’re living off welfare?
To the guys on this forum, what are your thoughts on this?