Peoples champ vs. the phallic narcissist, who seems to be in it for himself and dthe money yand the things he gets on the other end. A recent example that looked kind of like this was Mayweather v. Pacquiao.
However, it is important I think to note too that the world isnt black and white, and while media and the people trying to sell tickets and boost publiicty would have you think and believe that these guys hate each other and are so much one end or the other (they are polar eith erthe good guy or the bad guy), there are shades of gray and the bad guys have other good in them and good guys have other bad in them. Everyone is on a spectrum kinda and even the people really trying in the public eye to act like one solid consistent dogmatic way have other shades to them. They're human and have sides of themselves that they downplay, or dont show, or try not to have come up with the feelings and emotions that they involve (but regardless they are there adn wiill come up some way or another, whether they let them or not and whether they show that publicly or not).
People are complex and as much as each of us would want to split poeple up that quickly and like one and hate the other, there are always in fact more to each individual person. And in that way, even serial killers on one end of spectrum and say monks on another end of spectrum both have their own virtues and vices. And can deviate too; someties do good things sometimes do bad.
We are all human and the mix of parts makes us that, and only that
Rage
