- Joined
- Jan 3, 2020
- Messages
- 329
This whole type business is dumb. It is not a real thing, and it’s usage is a perfect example of backwards rationalization.
1. You and her have sex
2. Oh, he must have been my type
1. She sucks your dick
2. Hmm, I guess I’m her type.
It’s a complete misunderstanding of cause and effect. You can’t find out if your her “type” till after you fuck her. If you say hey to a girl and you don’t have sex you’re left thinking “it’s cuz I wasn’t her type” when in fact maybe she was in a shitty mood or you said something embarrassing.
There is no “type” program in any human being lol. Total bullshit. No way anyway should be teaching their kids that - “son just be her type and you’re good.”
Also, typness makes it seem as if the perception of what an ideal man looks and behaves like is just a matter of total preference. If it were the case then there would be no consistency whatsoever in what man is considered attractive or not, when clearly there is much consistency. If women couldn’t tell what a proper (ie beautiful/handsome/ideal) man looked like than they would not be able to tell that there is a man dancing with a woman in this drawing
How could people reproduce if they couldn’t tell what a proper (ie adequate/beautiful/good/ideal) version of the opposite sex looked like? Wouldn’t be possible. A rock would loook as much as a woman as aurora lol. Anything about type or the subjectivity of attractiveness should be abandoned. Do you see physicists saying “well it’s all subjective anyway, let’s go home and jerk off.”? What about chemists saying “well, what defines a chemical is really just a point of view. Our work is now done. Let’s go jerk off with the physics department.”? Definitely not. Then why are people whose business is to uncover the cause and effect between starting a conversation and banging a girl throwing up their hands with “well, just be her type and you’ll have sex. There ya go.” Stupid and useless; doesn’t correspond with anything else we see in life. “Well that’s a nice painting because it’s my type. And these flowers here, well they must be my type as well since they are also pretty to me. And that German Shepard over there; must be my type also lol.”
@flatron bro, have you ever lied to someone before? If someone can lie their way through an interview to get a great job, or lie their way to get a raise, why can’t they lie to a girl all the way to a bedroom? - there ya go, verbal methods of manipulating a woman to sex is born
1. You and her have sex
2. Oh, he must have been my type
1. She sucks your dick
2. Hmm, I guess I’m her type.
It’s a complete misunderstanding of cause and effect. You can’t find out if your her “type” till after you fuck her. If you say hey to a girl and you don’t have sex you’re left thinking “it’s cuz I wasn’t her type” when in fact maybe she was in a shitty mood or you said something embarrassing.
There is no “type” program in any human being lol. Total bullshit. No way anyway should be teaching their kids that - “son just be her type and you’re good.”
Also, typness makes it seem as if the perception of what an ideal man looks and behaves like is just a matter of total preference. If it were the case then there would be no consistency whatsoever in what man is considered attractive or not, when clearly there is much consistency. If women couldn’t tell what a proper (ie beautiful/handsome/ideal) man looked like than they would not be able to tell that there is a man dancing with a woman in this drawing

How could people reproduce if they couldn’t tell what a proper (ie adequate/beautiful/good/ideal) version of the opposite sex looked like? Wouldn’t be possible. A rock would loook as much as a woman as aurora lol. Anything about type or the subjectivity of attractiveness should be abandoned. Do you see physicists saying “well it’s all subjective anyway, let’s go home and jerk off.”? What about chemists saying “well, what defines a chemical is really just a point of view. Our work is now done. Let’s go jerk off with the physics department.”? Definitely not. Then why are people whose business is to uncover the cause and effect between starting a conversation and banging a girl throwing up their hands with “well, just be her type and you’ll have sex. There ya go.” Stupid and useless; doesn’t correspond with anything else we see in life. “Well that’s a nice painting because it’s my type. And these flowers here, well they must be my type as well since they are also pretty to me. And that German Shepard over there; must be my type also lol.”
@flatron bro, have you ever lied to someone before? If someone can lie their way through an interview to get a great job, or lie their way to get a raise, why can’t they lie to a girl all the way to a bedroom? - there ya go, verbal methods of manipulating a woman to sex is born