Were you able to check out the article I linked?
Before I delve into anything fashion-related, I must say that these insights
are built from my experiences. There are many ways to skin a cat concerning clothing and no one single correct answer. You will even find many different thoughts on clothing from very, very good seducers. This is why I mentioned the ever-important aspects of
congruency and calibration, aspects which are vital components of
the social frame concept.
Understanding social frame - something further explained
in Gunwitch's SMMA course, which forms the foundation for my game and the game of many others - will also be pivotal to understanding what I will say about my own thoughts on clothing. It's what I mean when I say that I don't want anything to be knee-jerk. As Gunwitch explains, the reversed amygdala of women creates a dynamic which allows us to manipulate the states of women with covert influence rather than, say,
LMS fatalist philosophies.
A fundamental aspect of this is accepting that when women first view us, we are generally just blobs of skin-and-bone to her. This is something that we can leverage, but in order to leverage it, we should not create a situation where she is already making negative, knee-jerk assumptions about who we are and what we're like. What we don't want is her to think is,
"Okay, I shouldn't be talking to this guy because he's X."
From the start, we want to avoid doing things that can
other us... or
even make us seem dangerously uncalibrated. This dynamic can even be amplified in situations where women will have extra-sensitive radars about their surroundings, such as during nightlife where creepy guys abound. So such delicate environments call for peak levels of social calibration, like in
street nightgame.
As a result, I have grown to prefer clothing that will maximize my chances to NOT be knee-jerk, and instead, fully provide me the opportunity to start working the frames
with my verbals instead. Of course, you could run your verbals with whatever clothing. But when I was wearing my snazzy outfits with the green sneakers, I'd look very "street." This may be a social frame positive for some bad bitches
but social frame negatives for others. For the latter, that'd just be one more thing I'd have to reframe or work past to become "ok to fuck" social frame wise. Hence why I'd rather stay closer to something that wouldn't create that effect for the highest percentage of girls. As Bacchus says, "dressing only slightly better than everyone else." See what that's all about?
It's what the AF1s help accomplish. Putting together outfits a little better than everyone else while not becoming knee-jerk for most girls. Allowing my verbals to start from a good ground so I can more easily place the frames when I want without unnecessary resistance,
dropping all ego along the way.
Which is why I said the AF1s were a net-benefit... in these contexts. Not necessarily compared to the green sneakers that I love. But that's also true here.
Not that you can't seduce with the green sneakers because you definitely can. It's just that personally I'm all about maximizing my chances even if it means paying attention to the little things in the very specific environments I was operating in.
This field experience largely occurred on the late-night streets of a more conservative town. If I was daygaming in New York, the social frames would have its own different type of unique variances. And in other millieus you can exploit the use of extremely flamboyant clothing,
like Teevster does in European nightclubs.
Overall I'd recommend a close study of the environments you operate in and understanding how to leverage your attire in your advantage based on these factors. For me, the most efficacious style became a cleanly sleek type to sidestep knee-jerk reactions and help me
get in the minds of women and construct the frames from there.
Maybe your field experinces will lead you to a similar conclusion, or perhaps you'll discover something different altogether.