I actually don't even know what method I'M running lol. I just picked and choosed certain elements that I liked from each of the guys in my comment, and that's my game.
First I am manipulative by nature, so I'll seek guys who display manipulative tendencies (basically someone who uses crafty/deceptive tactics (and is consciously aware he is using them, so that he can teach/explain the reasoning behind why he decided to use XYZ in this situation) to smoothly get what they want). That's one category of guys I want to study. Next, I'll read field reports/watch infields, and seek out guys who display a similar sense of humor to me (retarded/slightly offensive/self amusing jokes) in the way they react to/and provoke shit tests because that gives me inspiration for the way I want to run things VS following someone who doesn't use much if any (or his style of humor is boring to me) humor in his game.
So for my sense of humor category there is: YaReally, RSDJulien, RSDMax, and A2daMIR.
For my manipulative category there is: The UMP guys, JP, Saul Tee, Bacchus, and Teevster.
What I took away from the members in the manipulative category:
UMP (Ultimate Man Project) guys - Lead me to read Ciadini's books on persuasion. I mainly use the consistency&commitment principle and the liking principle, for investment game.
JP - Showing the girl what traits I value in girls, so that she'll know what she needs to display about herself to make me like her. which so happen to be conductive to getting an SNL.
Saul Tee - His Investment Model.
Bacchus - Ask her the questions you want her to ask you, memory association.
Teevster - Sex talk/prizing.
And from both Teevster and Bacchus's material, is what lead to me creating my SNL gambits using stories from my personal 5 year journey.
So that's how I came up with my game style