- Joined
- Aug 23, 2013
- Messages
- 1,928
well @Teevster this may be hard for you to believe, but there are a lot of players out there who don't use hypnotism or nlp. that seems to be what you define as technical game. i mean i posted a folder full of girls. not just girls, but very hot girls all time and date stamped, most from my snapchat. follow me if you like. i would post pics of every girl if it were allowed, because i stand by my results. at the end of the day, girls like to fuck. you do not have to hypnotize them. most view stacking rehearsed stories on top of each other as contrived. it just seems silly and unnecesary to me.
At no point have i stated the necessity for Hypnosis to get laid.
I have however stated the importance of FRAMES.
Which, is very in line with swinggcat's RWD.
As mentioned above, people are not primarily judged by the lay count, because it can be exagerated and it also leaves out the qualitative aspects such as how hot they are, and also the context (banging 10 girls a year in Iran may be harder than 30 in LA). Additionally, as you seem to agree with, men have different starting points. Men of better genetics and more favoural socio-cultural background will have an easier time than those who don't. An ugly loser who gets 10 lays a year is there skilled pick up wise than a good looking club owner with 30 lays a year.
For this reason people are judged by the quality of their reports and analysis and techniques. Pics does not say much. They can also be faked (not accusing you of doing this) and may also just be pics of girl you talk to, or flirt with, without proving you are actually fucking them (and no, do not post pics of your cock getting sucked off). Hence this is why the quality of ones post and how useful they are to others are the main aspects determining one's success in pick up.
here is how i got to my first hundred:
prior to getting married, i had been with somewhere between 35-50 girls. i have no idea really. in college most of my friends were black athletes. i mostly emulated what they did. they just didn't really give a fuck. i also got some easy lays being the only white guy around sometimes. i've also always lifted weights when single, which helps tremendously.
in 2016 i got on tinder. @Sub-Zero there was no boost at this time. i paid like $10 a month for premium so i could swipe unlimited. i would us game concepts that i learned from rsd in the texts and then on the dates. most of the 75 lays in that year came from this. i was posting tinder conversations. but that is not allowed now either. i'm copying and pasting texts to help guys with their texting currently. i don't post the ones where girls open me with "your gorgeous," like one of my current fbs did. i'm seeing her tonight. if you want my snap i can have her snap you. she's pretty hot lol.
Have you EVER taken a hot girls phone and swiped? you get 30 matches in just a matter of a few minutes Even if you are good looking and photogenic (which you may be, but still does not qualifies as game - also Tinder in general is not qualified as pick up, but this is a controversial subject I will leave out for now) you will still be one of many. The odds of getting girls on Tinder, especially the hotter ones is limited. I have tried this using a male model pic and i invite anybody else to try. Can you get laid on Tinder? yes! Will you get tons of high quality? No, you will not.
anyway i doubt i've hit 100 from cold approach unless you include the ones from before pickup, if you do i am almost certainly there. that would be of more relevance i guess. although nowadays i'd say online is equally to a lot of guy. i spent almost a year going out an average of 3 times per week and seldom pulling. my first pull was like three months in. i got head in a pickup truck in austin texas. it would be another six months until i'd pull to close. luckily i was getting laid on tinder a lot.
Thank you for clarifying. It all makes more sense to me now.
I must apologize for misunderstanding, Knowing game is a result of cold approach - not having a few out of 100 girls like your pic.
after about nine months shit started to pick up. the first lay reports here are from around that time. i was stoked to get lays back to back weeks with the tinder in between.
LR+ - my old lay reports. more to come
these were from the rsd forum. i found them with the wayback machines. not all will load though and my favorite is one of them. anyway good to remember when i first really started pimpin. Tuesday August 8 2017 Had drinks with friends at house. Then walked to local bar. Me and friend approached...www.skilledseducer.com
After a brief look at the reprots, you fail to provide good contextual analysis, as well as technical analysis. there are also a few things I find questionable in them, but I may discuss this in a future.
but yea it was a lot of rejection for a long time. also a lot of going direct.
So maybe the better question would be... what is your meet to lay ratio?
it started to work. but around maybe january of 2018 i discovered swinggcat. trying to implement his shit my game took a huge step backwards. i was already doing a lot of the stuff he recommended but hadn't gotten anywhere near where he was at. after a few months of studying him my game was next level. in july of 2018 i was dating two certified stunner chicks. one was a college student who become my girlfriend. one was an acctress whose movie roles were things like "hot chick." i would spend the next year in a committed relationship in which would only cheat a couple times.
Cool, but you never see the pros spend more words bragging about how hot they girls are, then delivering content, like in your case. More content, less bragging.
Pablo is one of those guys who fuck the hottest girls around (even Matador has stated to be impressed by him) and you have never seen him brag in his lay reports on mASF.
b
etween june of 2017 and august of 2018 i probably slept with fifty chicks for cold approach. since my breakup i estimated recently another thirty in the past six months. i've written two field reports since. i'll post them both below. i have pics of both chicks, but i'm not allowed to post them.
And yet out of those 50 girls, you still have failed to provide any clue of deeper theoretical or technical understanding.
the moral of the story is, it's hard work for anyone. but it requires no knowledge of hypnotism whatsoever. girls really do like to fuck. here are technical concepts i use off the top of my head:
I can agree with this, but please link me to a post where you discuss any of these.... (I know you shared one of swinggcats hypnotic patterns).
Now regarding hypnosis:
qualifying and disqualfying the girl (fractionation)
disqualifying and dhving myself (frame control and convying perceptions)
push pull (Fractionation)
push pull with emotional vulnerability - it's different with you shit (Fractionation)
intrigue - can i tell you something, can you keep a secret (intrigue is hypnosis)
role playing (role playing is framing and elicitation)
blaming the chick (frame control)
disqualifying sex (frame control, inducing a feeling of lack)
using we language (hypnosis - rapport)
I love swinggcats stuff, but I still miss seeing more posts on you covering the depth of his method. It focuses a lot of framing, which as you may not have guessed was one of the main pillars of my game. Swinggcat is one of my biggest inspirations.
PS: swinggcat was also one of Ross' best students.... huuum..
then there's the basic stuff like making eye contact, leading, speaking loud, downward tonality, and escalating. and i hate to break it to, considering i know how hard you try, but you can get laid fairly consistently just by those five things and approaching enough. it really isn't that hard. i think you guys overcomplicate it personally. question me all you want. i had no problem proving my results, but the kibosh has but put on that whole thing.
Fair enough, but one thing is doing attractive things, one thing is managing context, talking about real world phenomena. I still have not seen you post about things like heavy decision making under pressure, wildcards, or any of those other key aspects that are directly related to the real world - aspects that are key to success beyond just "getting lucky".
but i do like that you frame that i don't do anything technical when my posts completely suggest otherwise. i just think the stuff you do is silly. maybe it works for you. i don't know, nor do i really care. i don't think more than a handful of people are having success the way you do. but a lot of people are getting laid. maybe just because people do stuff differently than you it doesn't make them wrong. if you're that focused on being right, i feel sorry for you honestly. this should be fun
One thing I do not need to do is to show you that people do have major success with my material - as a matter of fact, glow posted a lay report 30 minute ago.
On NextASF, when you posted under "allmyfriendsaredead", I cannot remember seeing any technical posts from you.
But I do not mind being proved otherwise.
I will be curious to know, what did you try to accomplish with stating your lay count here.
That could be quite revealing.
Maybe I should shared mine, as well as my ratio.
Meh, I will let people judge by my material, unless anyone really wants to know my count (which I honestly have not managed to keep track on after my 100th lay many years ago.)
Best,