What's new

The Complete guide to sexual availability screening v-blog

Skills

Tribal Elder
Tribal Elder
Joined
Nov 11, 2019
Messages
5,606
unfortunately the video is restricted, due to youtube retards so you need to be over 18 to watch...

I keep calling @James Cruse @James D well they are both james, in my defense....

In this video i try to explain the history of screening, what it is and the misunderstanding and misconception....
  • I make the point and i am willing to put money that i don't care who you are you can be a CEO, a multimillionaire, a celebrity, a top seducer, a male model, or a robot created by the hottest girls in the word and program by top seducers there are and will always will be 3 types of women: receptive/interested/available, in the fence/neutral/not sure were she stands yet, need more info, and not receptive, not available not interested . It is a FACT, not a system.
  • I make the point every game that exist even natural has some screening involve but is not the fast sexual availability screening.
  • I also make the point it was a gen x style of game pre tinder, and that is why people don't get the context. Most guys never experience this cause they were babies or not born in that era.
  • I talk about how people think all screeners are neo direct or what i call blow me in blow me out, or direct sexual like mode one/stellar/apocalypse opener and the likes but is just looking for more receptive women that are down in a short window of time, is not open and if she gives you shit you leave like Lothario claims or people associate this with traffic light stuff when is not.
  • I name drop some screeners and give a sample of present people doing screening
  • I explain how i got involve in all this none sense due to @KJ Francis and @Spike retarded going in circle fights, and the bastardazation of the game by guys like lothario...
-I make the point that screening went to apps, you can do it but not consistently and reliably now a days like it used to.
  • I mention a seducer name spike/Velasco as an example of a somewhat successful modern screener...
This is what screener game is:

"How does a screener game looks like:

1.- presentation.- The typical screener is a dude that is in shape, dress somewhat cool for his type of demographic, cool haircut, maybe a tatoo or 2, facial hair.... In other word he looks cool and above average and typically dress to a particular niche audience. The ones online will get professional pics (dude, bd, etc..), the other ones will post shirtless pics (gll, therevelifestyledesign etc..)

2.- pre-approach.- The majority either hoover, mingle, throw some type of approach invites(eye contact is big with some screeners, i personally don't do eye contact), they are good at reading body language and dtfness due to experience or analyze the group/social dynamic (what is her deal, who is she with etc...). or just put himself in a situation were he can have a convo or get open. The online ones, look for pics of girls that are their type and mass spam them)

3.- Open.- Some will just flat out approach an open even without approach invites. Others will approach like they just "ups happen to be there" my style, post some type of feel of receptiveness.. Most openers are direct OR INDIRECT, some are situational, in the open there will be some type OF ESCALATION, for example milking the intro, a touch, something... Physicality is extremely important for screeners...

4.- fluff.- The goal of the screener is to display his attractive personality during the interaction(aka the so call game), but the main focus is on escalation and moving things forwards toward SEX (even if the goal is not sex on the same day, but physicality is extremely important for the screener above everything else)

5.- unlike the ridiculous bs being spit out in sedfast lately, if she ain't dtf, does not mean is over. The screener will just get the number and CONT. the interaction some other time via text/facebook/phone, later the same night, second meet, text etc... But he will not devote tremendous amount of time if the girl is not a go, he rathers spend that time on other women, and game that women either later(if somewhat receptive, invested) or not at all (if based on experience he knows there is nothing there). I will emphasize that the goal if is not sex is a very solid interaction, most of screeners gauge interaction mainly by the receptiveness of physicality and investment on the girl."


^ is not always direct sexual mode one (some do), is not neo direct (some are like lothario and the rest of the retards), there are different flavors and styles...





Additional context:





this is another video on how scotty used to do it back in the days and a video how it looks today and for me none sense, you can watch that and be impressed i am not at all

^ i can do what scotty he did on the video and even make it more wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy more impressive than that, i would not do that today, that is not a good interaction, but people impress in the comments lol...

however he got the number i guess, i don't think that number will go anywhere but maybe i am wrong, is ok, and i got scotty in my channel i just think time machine...
 

James Cruse

Cro-Magnon Man
Cro-Magnon Man
Joined
Jun 5, 2020
Messages
150
Yeah, so I translated Screening to mean:

Screening = Testing for (already Existing) Compliance

The point is - why bother stopping there?
You can spend a few minutes to increase that compliance sharply, so why not do that? You haven’t lost alot of time or effort.

And you can ruin a seduction with what you would call a “green” girl by her giving you increasingly less compliance/interest due to whatever non-seductive actions you’re taking.

The purpose of ‘Screening Game’ was meant for guys that:

1. Wanted to be efficient and not waste time and effort and the opportunity cost (of not talking to more interested women)

2. To weed out un-interested women - to find the women that are genuinely interested in them.


The reason men wanted the above was:

a. Men couldn’t reliably read women’s signals of interest or disinterest

b. Didn’t want to learn seduction to increase women’s interest (compliance) or they kept trying to use seduction and failing (or just couldn’t improve their seduction because they couldn’t (a.) reliably read a woman’s interest.

The point here is: we now know how to solve these problems in seduction.
We (well I personally) know that:

Compliance/Investment/Co-Operation = Interest/Seduction

Now currently you’re time-machining a part of old seduction that we no longer need or is useful.

You’re suggesting to guys that we don’t need to think directly about compliance or spending a tiny amount of time building more compliance.

It just seems totally regressive and stuck in the past from a time where we all knew less about seduction and about women’s behaviour.
 
you miss 100% of the shots you don't take
Top