The Complete guide to sexual availability screening v-blog

[Skills]

unfortunately the video is restricted, due to youtube retards so you need to be over 18 to watch...

I keep calling @James Cruse @James D well they are both james, in my defense....

In this video i try to explain the history of screening, what it is and the misunderstanding and misconception....

• I make the point and i am willing to put money that i don't care who you are you can be a CEO, a multimillionaire, a celebrity, a top seducer, a male model, or a robot created by the hottest girls in the word and program by top seducers there are and will always will be 3 types of women: receptive/interested/available, in the fence/neutral/not sure were she stands yet, need more info, and not receptive, not available not interested . It is a FACT, not a system.
• I make the point every game that exist even natural has some screening involve but is not the fast sexual availability screening.
• I also make the point it was a gen x style of game pre tinder, and that is why people don't get the context. Most guys never experience this cause they were babies or not born in that era.
• I talk about how people think all screeners are neo direct or what i call blow me in blow me out, or direct sexual like mode one/stellar/apocalypse opener and the likes but is just looking for more receptive women that are down in a short window of time, is not open and if she gives you shit you leave like Lothario claims or people associate this with traffic light stuff when is not.
• I name drop some screeners and give a sample of present people doing screening
• I explain how i got involve in all this none sense due to @KJ Francis and @Spike retarded going in circle fights, and the bastardazation of the game by guys like lothario...

-I make the point that screening went to apps, you can do it but not consistently and reliably now a days like it used to.

• I mention a seducer name spike/Velasco as an example of a somewhat successful modern screener...

This is what screener game is:

"How does a screener game looks like:

1.- presentation.- The typical screener is a dude that is in shape, dress somewhat cool for his type of demographic, cool haircut, maybe a tatoo or 2, facial hair.... In other word he looks cool and above average and typically dress to a particular niche audience. The ones online will get professional pics (dude, bd, etc..), the other ones will post shirtless pics (gll, therevelifestyledesign etc..)

2.- pre-approach.- The majority either hoover, mingle, throw some type of approach invites(eye contact is big with some screeners, i personally don't do eye contact), they are good at reading body language and dtfness due to experience or analyze the group/social dynamic (what is her deal, who is she with etc...). or just put himself in a situation were he can have a convo or get open. The online ones, look for pics of girls that are their type and mass spam them)

3.- Open.- Some will just flat out approach an open even without approach invites. Others will approach like they just "ups happen to be there" my style, post some type of feel of receptiveness.. Most openers are direct OR INDIRECT, some are situational, in the open there will be some type OF ESCALATION, for example milking the intro, a touch, something... Physicality is extremely important for screeners...

4.- fluff.- The goal of the screener is to display his attractive personality during the interaction(aka the so call game), but the main focus is on escalation and moving things forwards toward SEX (even if the goal is not sex on the same day, but physicality is extremely important for the screener above everything else)

5.- unlike the ridiculous bs being spit out in sedfast lately, if she ain't dtf, does not mean is over. The screener will just get the number and CONT. the interaction some other time via text/facebook/phone, later the same night, second meet, text etc... But he will not devote tremendous amount of time if the girl is not a go, he rathers spend that time on other women, and game that women either later(if somewhat receptive, invested) or not at all (if based on experience he knows there is nothing there). I will emphasize that the goal if is not sex is a very solid interaction, most of screeners gauge interaction mainly by the receptiveness of physicality and investment on the girl."


^ is not always direct sexual mode one (some do), is not neo direct (some are like lothario and the rest of the retards), there are different flavors and styles...

Additional context:

Screening game has been high jacked and bastardized

Guys a bit of rambling cause i am just disgusted and fuming (again why i avoid pick up content) context.- I have not watched pua content for a while, i don't know somewhere along the line i lost interest, i would say the last 5 years, got repetitive and water down and shifted to more of those...

www.skilledseducer.com

How to identify women that want sex just by body language

how to spot down to fuck women specially in clubs to maximize your chances of same night lays (snl)

www.theskillsmethod.com

Introduction to Approach Invites/Warm approach (Featuring Corvette aka Illuminatus) - The Skills Method

I quote in my book, posts and in my blog tons of good seducers, why? Cause I do not have a big ego, I put your getting good with women … Continue Reading →

www.theskillsmethod.com

Very direct sexual methods statistics and analysis - The Skills Method

Currently there are 3 super direct sexual methods that are popular in the seduction community: Mode One (by Allen Roger Curie), Stelar Method (by Stelar from Sleazy forum who is … Continue Reading →

www.theskillsmethod.com

this is another video on how scotty used to do it back in the days and a video how it looks today and for me none sense, you can watch that and be impressed i am not at all

^ i can do what scotty he did on the video and even make it more wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy more impressive than that, i would not do that today, that is not a good interaction, but people impress in the comments lol...

however he got the number i guess, i don't think that number will go anywhere but maybe i am wrong, is ok, and i got scotty in my channel i just think time machine...

 

[James Cruse]

Yeah, so I translated Screening to mean:

Screening = Testing for (already Existing) Compliance

The point is - why bother stopping there?
You can spend a few minutes to increase that compliance sharply, so why not do that? You haven’t lost alot of time or effort.

And you can ruin a seduction with what you would call a “green” girl by her giving you increasingly less compliance/interest due to whatever non-seductive actions you’re taking.

The purpose of ‘Screening Game’ was meant for guys that:

1. Wanted to be efficient and not waste time and effort and the opportunity cost (of not talking to more interested women)

2. To weed out un-interested women - to find the women that are genuinely interested in them.


The reason men wanted the above was:

a. Men couldn’t reliably read women’s signals of interest or disinterest

b. Didn’t want to learn seduction to increase women’s interest (compliance) or they kept trying to use seduction and failing (or just couldn’t improve their seduction because they couldn’t (a.) reliably read a woman’s interest.

The point here is: we now know how to solve these problems in seduction.
We (well I personally) know that:

Compliance/Investment/Co-Operation = Interest/Seduction

Now currently you’re time-machining a part of old seduction that we no longer need or is useful.

You’re suggesting to guys that we don’t need to think directly about compliance or spending a tiny amount of time building more compliance.

It just seems totally regressive and stuck in the past from a time where we all knew less about seduction and about women’s behaviour.

 

[KJ Francis]

Will have to watch later, but

You can spend a few minutes to increase that compliance sharply, so why not do that?

Isn't this #4 "fluff" from the OP?

You’re suggesting to guys that we don’t need to think directly about compliance or spending a tiny amount of time building more compliance.

Along with this, the compliance is in her accepting the rapid micro escalation?

I guess the question is how much time does screening game take to screen? And what is the fluff verbal content about... If it is focused on her personally like teasing, cold reads, a bit of getting to know her but more banter type not full deep dive etc. this is building her investment?

Would this be screening game?

From this weekend (first approach of the night), we were in front of her coworkers (club bouncers). So I used close proximity but no touch until saying goodbye. In place of physicality, I used boyfriend disqualification and sub communication as the screen.

-outside club 23 yr old lone wolf texting, I ask if she's meeting someone

-she says she works inside the club

-cold read and tease, she then tells me a bit of her story relating to starting working there

-I drop that I've never been inside this club because I am not from here, just traveling for the night (this is screening?)

-I go back to getting more of her story (investment). From this point if she keeps investing and is compliant, she has passed the screen filter?

-she then asks me my name and where I am from

-I ask if she has time to stroll the block with me but she has to go back in to work so I say I probably won't still be out at 2:30am (had to leave early morning) but let's exchange numbers just in case

-she eagerly agrees and says herself if not then maybe next time I'm in town and she will get me in the club

-she earnestly checks her phone to make sure it goes through when I text her standing there

 

[Skills]

Will have to watch later, but

Isn't this #4 "fluff" from the OP?

yes

Along with this, the compliance is in her accepting the rapid micro escalation?

both

I guess the question is how much time does screening game take to screen? And what is the fluff verbal content about... If it is focused on her personally like teasing, cold reads, a bit of getting to know her but more banter type not full deep dive etc. this is building her investment?

is a very minimal, look at spike reports or if they were all true kin from instagram, but every game has screening.... this is sexual availability screening and looking for dtf women...... Which is why recently you see all the guys showing up clubs about to close or closing.... imho, this game is inconsistent now a days, but my opinion... there are not that many sexual available, dtf girls like back in the days pre tinder... @James Cruse guarantee you never gamed in clubs pre tinder..

Would this be screening game?

i don't know if the vibe was sexual, or men to women, and touching... if those were there then yes

 

[Spike]

what is the fluff verbal content about... If it is focused on her personally like teasing, cold reads, a bit of getting to know her but more banter type not full deep dive etc. this is building her investment?

Flirting. Getting up in her space (but not staying there) as you talk and look at her sexually. She knows your intentions and can either respond positively or negatively to your flirting. Does not mean that she is DTF that night. Most of the time they won’t be. That doesn’t make her a yellow

 

[Skills]

Yeah, so I translated Screening to mean:

Screening = Testing for (already Existing) Compliance

Sexual availability screening and looking for down to fuck.... no there is not already existing compliance most of the times, but there may be existing iois or ais or absence of CLEAR fuck of get away from me body language and micro expressions....

The point is - why bother stopping there?
You can spend a few minutes to increase that compliance sharply, so why not do that? You haven’t lost alot of time or effort.

i already said in the video that this is part of it ^

And you can ruin a seduction with what you would call a “green” girl by her giving you increasingly less compliance/interest due to whatever non-seductive actions you’re taking.

the actions are seductive point #4

The purpose of ‘Screening Game’ was meant for guys that:

1. Wanted to be efficient and not waste time and effort and the opportunity cost (of not talking to more interested women)

2. To weed out un-interested women - to find the women that are genuinely interested in them.

correct

The reason men wanted the above was:

a. Men couldn’t reliably read women’s signals of interest or disinterest

Wrong, this is best on experience hundreds of approaches the only sign is any absence of CLEAR FUCK OFF, body language...

b. Didn’t want to learn seduction to increase women’s interest (compliance) or they kept trying to use seduction and failing (or just couldn’t improve their seduction because they couldn’t (a.) reliably read a woman’s interest.

lol, they know seduction, and they were getting laid as much or more than the 7 hours wait time dudes, in that era... I was getting laid 1- 3 times a week....consistently

Now what does the progression look like:

1.- At the beginning you will spam approach to get rid of approach anxiety. ( a normal dude should handle this in a month)

2.-then you will continue cold approach but a bit more selective due to identifying body language trends based on experience.

3.- you should start sleeping with girls from 5-8.

4.- you will get your first 8-10 interaction and indication of interest and maybe develop Onitis (obsession with that one girl).

5.- You will get more 8-10 and handle better the onitis, some here will go long term relationship.

6.- you will get your heart broken and brake some hearts.

7.- now you will have a better sense of women and dynamics.

8.- After sleeping with a lot of women and all types of women, you will develop a type of girl you are more drawn too.

9.- You will start becoming like a girl.(in the thought process)

10.- just like women you will develop more appreciation beyond looks for sexual compatibility and personality.

So how does success look like:

This is a million dollar question, success is relative and personalized and may change based on age and life stage…

For example some guys come into learn success with women to get a girlfriend out of it. (am I necessarily happier than them cause I sleep with more women, who knows?)

Some other guys can get tons of Onenight stands or single night lays… But, those same guys are sometimes not happy cause they can not hold on to a girl, so are they happier than a dude with long term girlfriend??? See were i am getting at?

Some other guys go through periods of pair bonding, fuckatons, back to pair bonding.

Some guys like to have long term poly relationships and complex set ups dating multiple girls at the same time. (and their own definition of what is happiness)

Some guys want a main girlfriend that are into 3 somes, to pick up other girls.

Some guys are happy having a long term girlfriend and going out, and getting laid if i feel like getting laid and not calling a girl back for 3 months etc..

Some guys like having multiple pair bonding experiences (serial monogaminst).

some guys like the traditional marriage and kids.

Some like to be married and poly.

Some live in with the wife and have a lover in another place that the wife knows about and is ok with.

In the above example who is to say one dude with a particular goal is happier than another dude.

In my opinion success from cold approach pick up should be close to this:

Most guys lay the 6-8 occasional 9 and rare 10. (no matter what type is their 10). Again most guys will make the 9-10 a girlfriend, or main girl… And/or most guys will pair bond even if the girl is not 9 or 10 and make her the girlfriend/main. The longer and the better you are the more picky you will also get selecting women, so your quality should go up on who are you gonna let in your life, your tolerance for bad behavior should go down.

If you go out 3 nights a week a good player should get laid 1 of those 3 nights. So maybe once a week. (this eventually will not be your focus, since you will be pickier and you will not care as bad to get laid).

A normal player with get laid once of 6 nights.(going out 3 times a week)

A beginner player once a month or so. If it takes longer there is a problem with looks, aspines etc…(going out 3 times a week)

Some guys will go longer periods of not getting laid cause they want the 9s and 10s so will sacrifice some quality for quantity. (I really do not recommend this). I will include some gurus as well, i know mystery only goes for 10s for example.(who knows though). Sometimes, is an excuse for not being good, “I only good for 10s etc..” aka cope out.

Now a single nigh lay is about finding a girl that is sexually available, and having the right logistics. The community over inflates snl/ons some for marketing and some of it is perception, a guy goes out 3 months then writes a report were he had a single night lay or a dude did 1,000 approaches got a one night stand with a tourist in Las Vegas. Get me? fucking a girl on the second or 3rd encounter, does not matter the goal is pipi in vagina or whatever your goal is as long as you do not come across as a provider.

I do recommend people get couple of one night stands for experience, it is not big deal, it actually sucks lol…(if people are honest most times they suck).

Hope it helps give you an idea on what to realistically expect from cold approach pick up. Out!

from this article i made https://www.theskillsmethod.com/what-results-to-expect-from-cold-approach-pick-up/

The point here is: we now know how to solve these problems in seduction.
We (well I personally) know that:

Compliance/Investment/Co-Operation = Interest/Seduction

as in the video guard down is my goal and for her to relax> a bit of compliance, micro escalations and sexual arousal = get laid or solid interaction

Now currently you’re time-machining a part of old seduction that we no longer need or is useful.

NOW WE AGREE, is time machine, useless on today market, which i role my eyes at the recent posts on shit that no longer works as well as when it was meant to be..... I repeat this 50 times on the forum, and 50 times on the video.... thought it can be done here and there depending on the club, the situation and amount of women..... again in the forum recently spike

You’re suggesting to guys that we don’t need to think directly about compliance or spending a tiny amount of time building more compliance.

no the opposite,

It just seems totally regressive and stuck in the past from a time where we all knew less about seduction and about women’s behaviour.

correct time machine game.... it did came back a bit a year or 2 ago right after corona, and it seems i believe first half of last year, it was coming back, it comes back here and there....

 

[Spike]

Showing up clubs about to close or closing.... imho, this game is inconsistent now a days, but my opinion... there are not that many sexual available, dtf girls like back in the days pre tinder

25:20-25:25 in your video

“you can do it today, but I don’t think there is enough volume”

There are actually a lot of girls that go out. Just that a lot of them don’t “count” as girls because you don’t want to sleep with those girls.

So by volume, you mean amount of hot girls that are out. Where before, there was a lot of them. You could leave one hot girl and go to the next and then keep approaching, because there is a lot of them (hot girls). Today there’s just less of them (hot girls) out. So you can approach approach approach. Only that now you have to be a sniper and you have to be 100% certain the girl you approach is the dtf one (you still get the number if she’s not down). Because if you choose that one. That means the other 3 hot girls you could have approached will no longer be available (either they left, you can’t find them anymore, they saw you approach that girl and now are in autorejection mode etc). If your standards are low, then you could approach approach approach because there are enough girls out, that if your goal is to get laid, you will easily get laid. But if your standards are high, that just means less approaching

 

[Skills]

25:20-25:25 in your video

“you can do it today, but I don’t think there is enough volume”

There are actually a lot of girls that go out. Just that a lot of them don’t “count” as girls because you don’t want to sleep with those girls.

So by volume, you mean amount of hot girls that are out. Where before, there was a lot of them. You could leave one hot girl and go to the next and then keep approaching, because there is a lot of them (hot girls). Today there’s just less of them (hot girls) out. So you can approach approach approach. Only that now you have to be a sniper and you have to be 100% certain the girl you approach is the dtf one (you still get the number if she’s not down). Because if you choose that one. That means the other 3 hot girls you could have approached will no longer be available (either they left, you can’t find them anymore, they saw you approach that girl and now are in autorejection mode etc). If your standards are low, then you could approach approach approach because there are enough girls out, that if your goal is to get laid, you will easily get laid. But if your standards are high, that just means less approaching

also i made a mistake cause it kind of sound like spam approaching, which is not....Also there not as many sexual available/dtf went to tinder, or in the social circle light..