What's new

Break Ups  When Going "No-Contact" Works vs. When It Doesn't

Chase

Chieftan
Staff member
tribal-elder
Joined
Oct 9, 2012
Messages
6,464
"Go no-contact" seems to be the default advice online for dealing with strained relationships.

If you ask me, there are basically tiers of "strained relationship handling":

  • D-Tier: chase after her, crying, offering her everything she wants. This will lose you all her respect and turn you into her doormat.

  • C-Tier: find some way to make her jealous to get her chasing after you. This can work sometimes but has a high backfire rate and really poisons the well at the same time (many girls will just decide "Two can play that game" -- and no matter how good you are with girls, girls themselves will always be better still at getting laid and rubbing it in your face).

  • B-Tier: go no-contact. Force her to come back on her own and bend to your frame. Of course, she may not come back. If/when she does come back, it is typically only after she's banged a few other dudes and missed what she had with you. The relationship dynamic often is not really the same after that point, because she kinda feels like she "settled": you weren't her ideal, but she found nothing better, so now she's back, ready to accept you warts and all.

  • A-Tier: just fix the problem. Use the Olive Rule. The only time you cannot do this is if the problem facing you is one of the 7 unresolvable romantic conflicts of interest. Do this, and a.) you don't become the doormat, b.) you never poison the well, and c.) she never goes out, messes around, then decides she is going to "settle" for you -- you remain Her Very Best Choice #1.

In my opinion, people online in general -- not just in pickup, but in the red pill space as well, in the female dating strategy space, and even on dating advice Reddit -- seem to default to "go no-contact" because a.) they don't have relationship-mending skills themselves and b.) the person they're advising also probably doesn't and it'd be too hard to coach that person through it. "No-contact", OTOH, is simple to understand and apply. Just stop contacting her and wait for her to come back; maybe she will, maybe she won't.



NO-CONTACT DOES NOT ALWAYS WORK

I'm going to quote @Skills here, who has had good experiences with it:

for me it has work for all the girls i have dated..... the only time i wrote "a letter" (just like you did in case of misunderstanding)/...

they came back from horrible shit i have done.... if you want in pm i can tell you some of the horrible shit! watch the video i posted it explain the why...

Probably I am simply not as sexy as Skills 😏 (I am kidding... we are equally sexy. Right Skills?) but my experience going no-contact with girls has been much more hit or miss regarding whether the girl comes back or not:

  • I have had girls come back to me after no-contact. It happens months later, and always after they have rebounded and banged some other guys. Usually they lie about it and say they did not, or are vague or evasive, however. But they reappear with something about how they miss you, or want to "try again", or how they have been thinking and they think we can make it work this time if we agree on a few changes, etc.

  • I have also had girls never come back after no-contact. That includes both girls where I have been guilty of being pretty awful and also girls where I ended things very amicably. In one case, a passive girl got roped back into me by another girl I was seeing later. As soon as the passive girl was back in my life, she was crying, telling me how much she had missed me, competing with the other girl, trying to get me for herself. But she never once reached out to me on her own. She didn't reengage until she was brought back in.

If you are doing no-contact, you should ONLY be doing it if you are completely fine with never hearing from the girl again.

Not every girl is going to chase you down to get you back, even if you were the Man of Her Dreams.

Some women are very passive; some view it as "the man's role" and accept that if the man does not contact them, that he is rejecting them; some leave everything "to fate" (you know... the "it just happened" types). Those types will usually not contact you first, and going no-contact with them simply means it is over, for good.



SHE'S BANGING OTHER DUDES ON NO-CONTACT

It is worth adding that in my experience if you let a girl go for N weeks or months, especially if you are a guy she was very into and needs to recover from emotionally, she is going to go on a rebound tear during that "no-contact" period and she will fuck some guys.

Depending on her personality and the relationship with you, she may admit it, she may lie and hide it from you, or she may be evasive. I had one girl who came back tell me she'd had sex with no one else. I knew it was BS, and found confirmation in her journal later (including all the lurid details!).

Another girl who came back made it seem like she'd been mourning my loss quietly, in a state of romantic tragedy, the poor girl; but I found out from a friend of hers she'd been banging her 50-year-old boss.

In one case, I know exactly when a girl I went no-contact with hooked up with new guys:

  • My first time going no-contact on her, she hooked up with a rebound FWB after 3 weeks.

  • My second time going no-contact on the same girl, she had a one-night stand with a different guy 1 month later.

In both cases I had put the girl through a pretty emotionally taxing relationship/breakup, so she needed rebounds to get her power back.

The less emotional the breakup, the longer a time you probably have before she goes out and hooks up with someone new (less strong of a need to emotionally rebound, etc.)

But you should always assume that from the moment you go no-contact, a countdown timer begins, and at some point new cock is going inside her.

If she comes back to you after banging other dudes, several unfortunate things happen:

  1. She has to decide how much to tell you. She is always going to conceal at least some of it from you: some thoughts, emotions, pleasures, etc. That is going to be her private little experience she had with other men between relationship stretches with you. This adds an additional crack into the foundation of the relationship. The more she conceals, the bigger the crack.

  2. She has settled for you. When a woman leaves, unless you did 100% of the breaking up yourself and made her feel completely rejected, she has it in her head that, "I can find someone like him or better." After she bangs a few other dudes / maybe dates some of them, then rotates back to you, when she comes back her thought is now, "He is the best I can find. Maybe there is a way we can make it work." Even if you were the Super Sexy Stud for her before, her top guy, best guy ever, #1 choice, you are now relegated to the guy she has settled for because reality has shown her she just can't do better than you -- even though she wanted to. Once again, another crack goes into the relationship foundation.

If you're a sexually liberal guy, you probably won't care she snarfed a few cocks in between relationship stints with you.

If you're not sexually liberal, however, or at least not in how you run your relationships, now you have a third unfortunate thing that you have let your "Pure Princess" run off, get pounded out by some dudes, then come back to you, and you are going to have visions of their big hairy dicks pounding her out pop into your head at the worst possible moments (like when she is giving you a nice little kiss and telling you "Have a nice day!" as she sends you off to work. "Man, I hope she doesn't fuck any more dudes while I'm at work!" you think!).



NO-CONTACT PUTS YOU ON MORE EQUAL TERMS

The biggest black mark against no-contact in my book is that if and when the girl comes back, even though she is the initiator, she is now on more even footing with you.

In the original relationship:

  • You approached her.
  • You picked her up.
  • You fucked her.
  • You kept her around.
  • You let it turn into a relationship.
  • You let her go.

But then at some point, after she finished rebounding & recovering, she came back to you, and you were there waiting, willing to take her back.

She now knows that she can leave and return.

She also knows you are not going to swiftly replace her (so no more dread game for you, my friend!).

This is fine if you are running low commitment, open relationships.

It is bad though if you are running high commitment, closed relationships.

You do not want "relationships of equals." You're the man; you must lead.

The fact that you let it fail the first time is a leadership failure:


The fact that she is the one who initiated and resumed things, once again, is a leadership failure (in this case, she was in the lead).

Sets a bad frame if you are having any kind of ongoing committed relationship.



WHEN SHOULD YOU USE NO-CONTACT?

Here are the situations I recommend no-contact for:

  1. When you honestly do not care if you ever see the girl again. If you can take her or leave her, you don't care, use no-contact.

  2. When you WANT her to rebound a bit on her own. Maybe she's being insufferable, and you realize any other dudes she nails are unlikely to outclass you -- and that once she realizes you're way better than her other options she'll chill out. This can be a valid use of no-contact.

  3. When you're running mLTRs. If you have multiple long-term relationships, and you're okay with girls coming and going and coming back again, no-contact is simply more efficient than sorting out relationship issues. Just let the girl who is having problems go, focus on your other girls who are still chill, and later the problem girl may come back, having resolved her problems on her own, ready to play ball again.

  4. When you frame it as "all sales final" to push her to come back faster. I have had girlfriends where I know with certainty they won't be able to last even 12 hours going no-contact, especially with how I frame the "end" of the relationship (i.e., that "all sales are final"). In this case, all you need to do is just wait -- within a few hours she will be messaging you to fix things (super fast no-contact).

  5. When the problem is an unresolvable one. e.g., she's giving you ultimatums about marriage/children, but you are set on being a childless bachelor for life. Or maybe you are just too young and don't want to be pushed into that yet. No-contact can extend your relationship lifespan with her some -- IF she comes back.



WHEN SHOULD YOU NOT USE NO-CONTACT?

Here are the situations I recommend against no-contact:

  1. When you do not want to let the girl go. No-contact is throwing the dice. If the dice land your way, she'll come back. Roll snake eyes? You'll never hear from her again. Don't roll dice if you aren't cool with losing her.

  2. When you do not want her banging other dudes. No-contact says "I don't care about you anymore and am not going to deal with your crap." The message she gets is that you have already moved on, so she should too. If you don't want her sleeping with other dudes, don't do no-contact.

  3. When you're running monogamous relationships and not picking up. If she is the only girl you're seeing, and you are not going to immediately hit the field and start picking up new girls, going no-contact just means you are going to be sitting there sexless and alone while she bangs new guys. If and when she does return to you, it will be a VERY different power dynamic (and not in your favor).

  4. When you're already clear on what the problem is and you know it's one you can/would like to solve. e.g., she wants marriage/babies, but thinks you don't, but actually you'd be fine with that. Going no-contact there is a terrible move, because you both want the same thing, there's just a communication barrier. Sending her off into the world to meet other men thinking "Obviously he doesn't want what I want" because you don't know how to communicate you actually do is like a tragic love story or something. No need for that.
If any of those apply to you, do not do no-contact.

Instead, use the Olive Rule and fix your relationship:




NO-CONTACT IS NOT REALLY ONE-SIZE-FITS-ALL

I know for a lot of guys "go no-contact" is the default "dealing with a tricky relationship" strategy.

As a guy who has done it, plus also used the Olive Rule to mend relationships in situations where most guys probably would've done no-contact -- for serious ongoing relationships, the Olive Rule is better.

That's because fixing the relationship

  1. Positions you as the LEADER
  2. Maintains good will with her (she feels understood, cherished, protected, etc.)
  3. Relieves all the bad stuff in her head (no need for her to leave, rebound, recover etc. -- now it is fixed)
  4. Is alpha-dominant (you force her to stay and fix the problem) vs. sigma-independent (just let her go)
  5. Is a flex in its own right -- most guys do not have this skill (they either grovel, play games, or do no-contact)

That said, if it is a situation where you just do not care if she still hangs around, or it is an mLTR and you can't be fucked, or the problem is an unresolvable one, or you're only using it as a short-term gimmick because you know she'll fold in hours or a day (and in case you read her resolve wrong and she doesn't, I hope you have your contingency in place!), then no-contact works just fine.

Chase
 

OldGuy

Cro-Magnon Man
Cro-Magnon Man
Joined
Jun 10, 2017
Messages
278
Back in the old days, I went to D-prime tier of just friends and hope they change their minds, since I did not think pandering would work.
 

Chase

Chieftan
Staff member
tribal-elder
Joined
Oct 9, 2012
Messages
6,464
@OldGuy,

Back in the old days, I went to D-prime tier of just friends and hope they change their minds, since I did not think pandering would work.

Was that for girls you broke up with?

So she'd break up → you'd become "just friends" with your ex?

I'd have to imagine that led to a lot of pain, right; hanging around exes as they dated new guys, etc.?
 

OldGuy

Cro-Magnon Man
Cro-Magnon Man
Joined
Jun 10, 2017
Messages
278
It did, although I have since found out several of the new guys were attempts to make me jealous. Not sure why they thought that would work.
For ones who sort of broke up (they had no problem going on dates with me, just told/showed me new guys). A few broke down when I finally got someone new.
 

DonGately

Modern Human
Modern Human
Joined
Mar 16, 2020
Messages
328
I've found [4] good use of no-contact to be extremely powerful. Like you said, when you know that specific girl won't get thru a night of sleep without texting/calling/emailing/begging for you.

Then you still hold the power and control the relationship.

[2] has also worked extremely well for me in cities like NYC where any hot girl gets tons of attention, and then after a few weeks realizes that those guys are just losers [or worse, doormats] when compared to you.
 

Will_V

Chieftan
Staff member
tribal-elder
Joined
Jan 24, 2021
Messages
2,207
"Go no-contact" seems to be the default advice online for dealing with strained relationships.

If you ask me, there are basically tiers of "strained relationship handling":

  • D-Tier: chase after her, crying, offering her everything she wants. This will lose you all her respect and turn you into her doormat.

  • C-Tier: find some way to make her jealous to get her chasing after you. This can work sometimes but has a high backfire rate and really poisons the well at the same time (many girls will just decide "Two can play that game" -- and no matter how good you are with girls, girls themselves will always be better still at getting laid and rubbing it in your face).

  • B-Tier: go no-contact. Force her to come back on her own and bend to your frame. Of course, she may not come back. If/when she does come back, it is typically only after she's banged a few other dudes and missed what she had with you. The relationship dynamic often is not really the same after that point, because she kinda feels like she "settled": you weren't her ideal, but she found nothing better, so now she's back, ready to accept you warts and all.

  • A-Tier: just fix the problem. Use the Olive Rule. The only time you cannot do this is if the problem facing you is one of the 7 unresolvable romantic conflicts of interest. Do this, and a.) you don't become the doormat, b.) you never poison the well, and c.) she never goes out, messes around, then decides she is going to "settle" for you -- you remain Her Very Best Choice #1.

In my opinion, people online in general -- not just in pickup, but in the red pill space as well, in the female dating strategy space, and even on dating advice Reddit -- seem to default to "go no-contact" because a.) they don't have relationship-mending skills themselves and b.) the person they're advising also probably doesn't and it'd be too hard to coach that person through it. "No-contact", OTOH, is simple to understand and apply. Just stop contacting her and wait for her to come back; maybe she will, maybe she won't.



NO-CONTACT DOES NOT ALWAYS WORK

I'm going to quote @Skills here, who has had good experiences with it:



Probably I am simply not as sexy as Skills 😏 (I am kidding... we are equally sexy. Right Skills?) but my experience going no-contact with girls has been much more hit or miss regarding whether the girl comes back or not:

  • I have had girls come back to me after no-contact. It happens months later, and always after they have rebounded and banged some other guys. Usually they lie about it and say they did not, or are vague or evasive, however. But they reappear with something about how they miss you, or want to "try again", or how they have been thinking and they think we can make it work this time if we agree on a few changes, etc.

  • I have also had girls never come back after no-contact. That includes both girls where I have been guilty of being pretty awful and also girls where I ended things very amicably. In one case, a passive girl got roped back into me by another girl I was seeing later. As soon as the passive girl was back in my life, she was crying, telling me how much she had missed me, competing with the other girl, trying to get me for herself. But she never once reached out to me on her own. She didn't reengage until she was brought back in.

If you are doing no-contact, you should ONLY be doing it if you are completely fine with never hearing from the girl again.

Not every girl is going to chase you down to get you back, even if you were the Man of Her Dreams.

Some women are very passive; some view it as "the man's role" and accept that if the man does not contact them, that he is rejecting them; some leave everything "to fate" (you know... the "it just happened" types). Those types will usually not contact you first, and going no-contact with them simply means it is over, for good.



SHE'S BANGING OTHER DUDES ON NO-CONTACT

It is worth adding that in my experience if you let a girl go for N weeks or months, especially if you are a guy she was very into and needs to recover from emotionally, she is going to go on a rebound tear during that "no-contact" period and she will fuck some guys.

Depending on her personality and the relationship with you, she may admit it, she may lie and hide it from you, or she may be evasive. I had one girl who came back tell me she'd had sex with no one else. I knew it was BS, and found confirmation in her journal later (including all the lurid details!).

Another girl who came back made it seem like she'd been mourning my loss quietly, in a state of romantic tragedy, the poor girl; but I found out from a friend of hers she'd been banging her 50-year-old boss.

In one case, I know exactly when a girl I went no-contact with hooked up with new guys:

  • My first time going no-contact on her, she hooked up with a rebound FWB after 3 weeks.

  • My second time going no-contact on the same girl, she had a one-night stand with a different guy 1 month later.

In both cases I had put the girl through a pretty emotionally taxing relationship/breakup, so she needed rebounds to get her power back.

The less emotional the breakup, the longer a time you probably have before she goes out and hooks up with someone new (less strong of a need to emotionally rebound, etc.)

But you should always assume that from the moment you go no-contact, a countdown timer begins, and at some point new cock is going inside her.

If she comes back to you after banging other dudes, several unfortunate things happen:

  1. She has to decide how much to tell you. She is always going to conceal at least some of it from you: some thoughts, emotions, pleasures, etc. That is going to be her private little experience she had with other men between relationship stretches with you. This adds an additional crack into the foundation of the relationship. The more she conceals, the bigger the crack.

  2. She has settled for you. When a woman leaves, unless you did 100% of the breaking up yourself and made her feel completely rejected, she has it in her head that, "I can find someone like him or better." After she bangs a few other dudes / maybe dates some of them, then rotates back to you, when she comes back her thought is now, "He is the best I can find. Maybe there is a way we can make it work." Even if you were the Super Sexy Stud for her before, her top guy, best guy ever, #1 choice, you are now relegated to the guy she has settled for because reality has shown her she just can't do better than you -- even though she wanted to. Once again, another crack goes into the relationship foundation.

If you're a sexually liberal guy, you probably won't care she snarfed a few cocks in between relationship stints with you.

If you're not sexually liberal, however, or at least not in how you run your relationships, now you have a third unfortunate thing that you have let your "Pure Princess" run off, get pounded out by some dudes, then come back to you, and you are going to have visions of their big hairy dicks pounding her out pop into your head at the worst possible moments (like when she is giving you a nice little kiss and telling you "Have a nice day!" as she sends you off to work. "Man, I hope she doesn't fuck any more dudes while I'm at work!" you think!).



NO-CONTACT PUTS YOU ON MORE EQUAL TERMS

The biggest black mark against no-contact in my book is that if and when the girl comes back, even though she is the initiator, she is now on more even footing with you.

In the original relationship:

  • You approached her.
  • You picked her up.
  • You fucked her.
  • You kept her around.
  • You let it turn into a relationship.
  • You let her go.

But then at some point, after she finished rebounding & recovering, she came back to you, and you were there waiting, willing to take her back.

She now knows that she can leave and return.

She also knows you are not going to swiftly replace her (so no more dread game for you, my friend!).

This is fine if you are running low commitment, open relationships.

It is bad though if you are running high commitment, closed relationships.

You do not want "relationships of equals." You're the man; you must lead.

The fact that you let it fail the first time is a leadership failure:


The fact that she is the one who initiated and resumed things, once again, is a leadership failure (in this case, she was in the lead).

Sets a bad frame if you are having any kind of ongoing committed relationship.



WHEN SHOULD YOU USE NO-CONTACT?

Here are the situations I recommend no-contact for:

  1. When you honestly do not care if you ever see the girl again. If you can take her or leave her, you don't care, use no-contact.

  2. When you WANT her to rebound a bit on her own. Maybe she's being insufferable, and you realize any other dudes she nails are unlikely to outclass you -- and that once she realizes you're way better than her other options she'll chill out. This can be a valid use of no-contact.

  3. When you're running mLTRs. If you have multiple long-term relationships, and you're okay with girls coming and going and coming back again, no-contact is simply more efficient than sorting out relationship issues. Just let the girl who is having problems go, focus on your other girls who are still chill, and later the problem girl may come back, having resolved her problems on her own, ready to play ball again.

  4. When you frame it as "all sales final" to push her to come back faster. I have had girlfriends where I know with certainty they won't be able to last even 12 hours going no-contact, especially with how I frame the "end" of the relationship (i.e., that "all sales are final"). In this case, all you need to do is just wait -- within a few hours she will be messaging you to fix things (super fast no-contact).

  5. When the problem is an unresolvable one. e.g., she's giving you ultimatums about marriage/children, but you are set on being a childless bachelor for life. Or maybe you are just too young and don't want to be pushed into that yet. No-contact can extend your relationship lifespan with her some -- IF she comes back.



WHEN SHOULD YOU NOT USE NO-CONTACT?

Here are the situations I recommend against no-contact:

  1. When you do not want to let the girl go. No-contact is throwing the dice. If the dice land your way, she'll come back. Roll snake eyes? You'll never hear from her again. Don't roll dice if you aren't cool with losing her.

  2. When you do not want her banging other dudes. No-contact says "I don't care about you anymore and am not going to deal with your crap." The message she gets is that you have already moved on, so she should too. If you don't want her sleeping with other dudes, don't do no-contact.

  3. When you're running monogamous relationships and not picking up. If she is the only girl you're seeing, and you are not going to immediately hit the field and start picking up new girls, going no-contact just means you are going to be sitting there sexless and alone while she bangs new guys. If and when she does return to you, it will be a VERY different power dynamic (and not in your favor).

  4. When you're already clear on what the problem is and you know it's one you can/would like to solve. e.g., she wants marriage/babies, but thinks you don't, but actually you'd be fine with that. Going no-contact there is a terrible move, because you both want the same thing, there's just a communication barrier. Sending her off into the world to meet other men thinking "Obviously he doesn't want what I want" because you don't know how to communicate you actually do is like a tragic love story or something. No need for that.
If any of those apply to you, do not do no-contact.

Instead, use the Olive Rule and fix your relationship:




NO-CONTACT IS NOT REALLY ONE-SIZE-FITS-ALL

I know for a lot of guys "go no-contact" is the default "dealing with a tricky relationship" strategy.

As a guy who has done it, plus also used the Olive Rule to mend relationships in situations where most guys probably would've done no-contact -- for serious ongoing relationships, the Olive Rule is better.

That's because fixing the relationship

  1. Positions you as the LEADER
  2. Maintains good will with her (she feels understood, cherished, protected, etc.)
  3. Relieves all the bad stuff in her head (no need for her to leave, rebound, recover etc. -- now it is fixed)
  4. Is alpha-dominant (you force her to stay and fix the problem) vs. sigma-independent (just let her go)
  5. Is a flex in its own right -- most guys do not have this skill (they either grovel, play games, or do no-contact)

That said, if it is a situation where you just do not care if she still hangs around, or it is an mLTR and you can't be fucked, or the problem is an unresolvable one, or you're only using it as a short-term gimmick because you know she'll fold in hours or a day (and in case you read her resolve wrong and she doesn't, I hope you have your contingency in place!), then no-contact works just fine.

Chase

Great post!

When the relationship has failed because of something you've done, you have to address it or it will choke the goodwill and enthusiasm out of everything even if she sticks around or comes back later. She may try to find ways to get back at you in some way, or at least protect herself from being vulnerable to your mistake again, which is all bad news for you.

I've never gone no contact as a way to try and fix things, for a few reasons:

- I'm an impatient guy, if she doesn't want me now then she doesn't want me period.
- I don't like to be passive waiting for her to be proactive.
- If I miss her and want her back I'm not gonna be sitting there hoping and waiting, it damages my overall frame and wellbeing. I'd rather round it all off and start a new story.
- There's no way I'm going to let her take a holiday on some dudes cock.

One more thing I've found is that there are times in a relationship when you have to be absolutely honest about mistakes you've made regardless of how embarrassed you are or how annoyed you are at how she acted as a result. To be able to state the facts without losing your sense of dominance or your trust in her submission to you is something you just have to find a way to do. Yes she might try to wave it in your face a bit but it's just another test, and later on her trust and loyalty will grow immensely from it.

Relationships, for a man, are more than anything a test of steadiness, consistency, and self-assuredness. To do the right thing with a sense of dominance regardless of the emotional heaving and hawing going on around you and even in your own head. That's what she wants to see so that she can let herself go into your frame.
 

HeartOfChaos

Space Monkey
space monkey
Joined
Aug 3, 2025
Messages
125
"Go no-contact" seems to be the default advice online for dealing with strained relationships.

If you ask me, there are basically tiers of "strained relationship handling":

  • D-Tier: chase after her, crying, offering her everything she wants. This will lose you all her respect and turn you into her doormat.

  • C-Tier: find some way to make her jealous to get her chasing after you. This can work sometimes but has a high backfire rate and really poisons the well at the same time (many girls will just decide "Two can play that game" -- and no matter how good you are with girls, girls themselves will always be better still at getting laid and rubbing it in your face).

  • B-Tier: go no-contact. Force her to come back on her own and bend to your frame. Of course, she may not come back. If/when she does come back, it is typically only after she's banged a few other dudes and missed what she had with you. The relationship dynamic often is not really the same after that point, because she kinda feels like she "settled": you weren't her ideal, but she found nothing better, so now she's back, ready to accept you warts and all.

  • A-Tier: just fix the problem. Use the Olive Rule. The only time you cannot do this is if the problem facing you is one of the 7 unresolvable romantic conflicts of interest. Do this, and a.) you don't become the doormat, b.) you never poison the well, and c.) she never goes out, messes around, then decides she is going to "settle" for you -- you remain Her Very Best Choice #1.

In my opinion, people online in general -- not just in pickup, but in the red pill space as well, in the female dating strategy space, and even on dating advice Reddit -- seem to default to "go no-contact" because a.) they don't have relationship-mending skills themselves and b.) the person they're advising also probably doesn't and it'd be too hard to coach that person through it. "No-contact", OTOH, is simple to understand and apply. Just stop contacting her and wait for her to come back; maybe she will, maybe she won't.



NO-CONTACT DOES NOT ALWAYS WORK

I'm going to quote @Skills here, who has had good experiences with it:



Probably I am simply not as sexy as Skills 😏 (I am kidding... we are equally sexy. Right Skills?) but my experience going no-contact with girls has been much more hit or miss regarding whether the girl comes back or not:

  • I have had girls come back to me after no-contact. It happens months later, and always after they have rebounded and banged some other guys. Usually they lie about it and say they did not, or are vague or evasive, however. But they reappear with something about how they miss you, or want to "try again", or how they have been thinking and they think we can make it work this time if we agree on a few changes, etc.

  • I have also had girls never come back after no-contact. That includes both girls where I have been guilty of being pretty awful and also girls where I ended things very amicably. In one case, a passive girl got roped back into me by another girl I was seeing later. As soon as the passive girl was back in my life, she was crying, telling me how much she had missed me, competing with the other girl, trying to get me for herself. But she never once reached out to me on her own. She didn't reengage until she was brought back in.

If you are doing no-contact, you should ONLY be doing it if you are completely fine with never hearing from the girl again.

Not every girl is going to chase you down to get you back, even if you were the Man of Her Dreams.

Some women are very passive; some view it as "the man's role" and accept that if the man does not contact them, that he is rejecting them; some leave everything "to fate" (you know... the "it just happened" types). Those types will usually not contact you first, and going no-contact with them simply means it is over, for good.



SHE'S BANGING OTHER DUDES ON NO-CONTACT

It is worth adding that in my experience if you let a girl go for N weeks or months, especially if you are a guy she was very into and needs to recover from emotionally, she is going to go on a rebound tear during that "no-contact" period and she will fuck some guys.

Depending on her personality and the relationship with you, she may admit it, she may lie and hide it from you, or she may be evasive. I had one girl who came back tell me she'd had sex with no one else. I knew it was BS, and found confirmation in her journal later (including all the lurid details!).

Another girl who came back made it seem like she'd been mourning my loss quietly, in a state of romantic tragedy, the poor girl; but I found out from a friend of hers she'd been banging her 50-year-old boss.

In one case, I know exactly when a girl I went no-contact with hooked up with new guys:

  • My first time going no-contact on her, she hooked up with a rebound FWB after 3 weeks.

  • My second time going no-contact on the same girl, she had a one-night stand with a different guy 1 month later.

In both cases I had put the girl through a pretty emotionally taxing relationship/breakup, so she needed rebounds to get her power back.

The less emotional the breakup, the longer a time you probably have before she goes out and hooks up with someone new (less strong of a need to emotionally rebound, etc.)

But you should always assume that from the moment you go no-contact, a countdown timer begins, and at some point new cock is going inside her.

If she comes back to you after banging other dudes, several unfortunate things happen:

  1. She has to decide how much to tell you. She is always going to conceal at least some of it from you: some thoughts, emotions, pleasures, etc. That is going to be her private little experience she had with other men between relationship stretches with you. This adds an additional crack into the foundation of the relationship. The more she conceals, the bigger the crack.

  2. She has settled for you. When a woman leaves, unless you did 100% of the breaking up yourself and made her feel completely rejected, she has it in her head that, "I can find someone like him or better." After she bangs a few other dudes / maybe dates some of them, then rotates back to you, when she comes back her thought is now, "He is the best I can find. Maybe there is a way we can make it work." Even if you were the Super Sexy Stud for her before, her top guy, best guy ever, #1 choice, you are now relegated to the guy she has settled for because reality has shown her she just can't do better than you -- even though she wanted to. Once again, another crack goes into the relationship foundation.

If you're a sexually liberal guy, you probably won't care she snarfed a few cocks in between relationship stints with you.

If you're not sexually liberal, however, or at least not in how you run your relationships, now you have a third unfortunate thing that you have let your "Pure Princess" run off, get pounded out by some dudes, then come back to you, and you are going to have visions of their big hairy dicks pounding her out pop into your head at the worst possible moments (like when she is giving you a nice little kiss and telling you "Have a nice day!" as she sends you off to work. "Man, I hope she doesn't fuck any more dudes while I'm at work!" you think!).



NO-CONTACT PUTS YOU ON MORE EQUAL TERMS

The biggest black mark against no-contact in my book is that if and when the girl comes back, even though she is the initiator, she is now on more even footing with you.

In the original relationship:

  • You approached her.
  • You picked her up.
  • You fucked her.
  • You kept her around.
  • You let it turn into a relationship.
  • You let her go.

But then at some point, after she finished rebounding & recovering, she came back to you, and you were there waiting, willing to take her back.

She now knows that she can leave and return.

She also knows you are not going to swiftly replace her (so no more dread game for you, my friend!).

This is fine if you are running low commitment, open relationships.

It is bad though if you are running high commitment, closed relationships.

You do not want "relationships of equals." You're the man; you must lead.

The fact that you let it fail the first time is a leadership failure:


The fact that she is the one who initiated and resumed things, once again, is a leadership failure (in this case, she was in the lead).

Sets a bad frame if you are having any kind of ongoing committed relationship.



WHEN SHOULD YOU USE NO-CONTACT?

Here are the situations I recommend no-contact for:

  1. When you honestly do not care if you ever see the girl again. If you can take her or leave her, you don't care, use no-contact.

  2. When you WANT her to rebound a bit on her own. Maybe she's being insufferable, and you realize any other dudes she nails are unlikely to outclass you -- and that once she realizes you're way better than her other options she'll chill out. This can be a valid use of no-contact.

  3. When you're running mLTRs. If you have multiple long-term relationships, and you're okay with girls coming and going and coming back again, no-contact is simply more efficient than sorting out relationship issues. Just let the girl who is having problems go, focus on your other girls who are still chill, and later the problem girl may come back, having resolved her problems on her own, ready to play ball again.

  4. When you frame it as "all sales final" to push her to come back faster. I have had girlfriends where I know with certainty they won't be able to last even 12 hours going no-contact, especially with how I frame the "end" of the relationship (i.e., that "all sales are final"). In this case, all you need to do is just wait -- within a few hours she will be messaging you to fix things (super fast no-contact).

  5. When the problem is an unresolvable one. e.g., she's giving you ultimatums about marriage/children, but you are set on being a childless bachelor for life. Or maybe you are just too young and don't want to be pushed into that yet. No-contact can extend your relationship lifespan with her some -- IF she comes back.



WHEN SHOULD YOU NOT USE NO-CONTACT?

Here are the situations I recommend against no-contact:

  1. When you do not want to let the girl go. No-contact is throwing the dice. If the dice land your way, she'll come back. Roll snake eyes? You'll never hear from her again. Don't roll dice if you aren't cool with losing her.

  2. When you do not want her banging other dudes. No-contact says "I don't care about you anymore and am not going to deal with your crap." The message she gets is that you have already moved on, so she should too. If you don't want her sleeping with other dudes, don't do no-contact.

  3. When you're running monogamous relationships and not picking up. If she is the only girl you're seeing, and you are not going to immediately hit the field and start picking up new girls, going no-contact just means you are going to be sitting there sexless and alone while she bangs new guys. If and when she does return to you, it will be a VERY different power dynamic (and not in your favor).

  4. When you're already clear on what the problem is and you know it's one you can/would like to solve. e.g., she wants marriage/babies, but thinks you don't, but actually you'd be fine with that. Going no-contact there is a terrible move, because you both want the same thing, there's just a communication barrier. Sending her off into the world to meet other men thinking "Obviously he doesn't want what I want" because you don't know how to communicate you actually do is like a tragic love story or something. No need for that.
If any of those apply to you, do not do no-contact.

Instead, use the Olive Rule and fix your relationship:




NO-CONTACT IS NOT REALLY ONE-SIZE-FITS-ALL

I know for a lot of guys "go no-contact" is the default "dealing with a tricky relationship" strategy.

As a guy who has done it, plus also used the Olive Rule to mend relationships in situations where most guys probably would've done no-contact -- for serious ongoing relationships, the Olive Rule is better.

That's because fixing the relationship

  1. Positions you as the LEADER
  2. Maintains good will with her (she feels understood, cherished, protected, etc.)
  3. Relieves all the bad stuff in her head (no need for her to leave, rebound, recover etc. -- now it is fixed)
  4. Is alpha-dominant (you force her to stay and fix the problem) vs. sigma-independent (just let her go)
  5. Is a flex in its own right -- most guys do not have this skill (they either grovel, play games, or do no-contact)

That said, if it is a situation where you just do not care if she still hangs around, or it is an mLTR and you can't be fucked, or the problem is an unresolvable one, or you're only using it as a short-term gimmick because you know she'll fold in hours or a day (and in case you read her resolve wrong and she doesn't, I hope you have your contingency in place!), then no-contact works just fine.

Chase
Just saw this post.

I assume it was posted following my own thread. Not sure if you kept up with it, but basically I messaged her a couple of days ago (following what RakeHell wrote), and once I tried to re-initiate the conversation about the relationship ("a part of me does not want to end things, and I know a part of you doesn't either...") , she replied straight away that she does not want to continue the romantic relationship. To which I said ok, ball in your court in future and left it at that.

Do you think this "A tier" approach failed because I was talking to her about it via text , not in person?
 

Chase

Chieftan
Staff member
tribal-elder
Joined
Oct 9, 2012
Messages
6,464
@HeartOfChaos,

Just saw this post.

I assume it was posted following my own thread. Not sure if you kept up with it, but basically I messaged her a couple of days ago (following what RakeHell wrote), and once I tried to re-initiate the conversation about the relationship ("a part of me does not want to end things, and I know a part of you doesn't either...") , she replied straight away that she does not want to continue the romantic relationship. To which I said ok, ball in your court in future and left it at that.

Do you think this "A tier" approach failed because I was talking to her about it via text , not in person?

The big problem for you was the overall confused, messy handling of the situation.

You only get so many "chances" before a woman decides it is just not going anywhere, contact with you is a mess, and gives up.

For your situation:

  1. You should've seen the warning signs and pre-empted the situation in May before it reached the tipping point.

  2. When that didn't happen, you should've handled it the first time she tried to break up with you in May.

  3. When that didn't happen, you should've handled it when she blew up at breaking point a few weeks back.

  4. When that didn't happen, you needed to send her a single, clear, dominant follow up that set the term and the frames to get her back out in-person to do what you didn't do in May or a few weeks back.

  5. When that didn't happen, and instead you sent a witch's brew of different contact attempts throwing different ideas at the wall based on different things different people were telling you, you ran out of "chances" and the girl just decided "You know what, screw this; I can't tell if he's playing me or his weaker and needier than I thought or what the situation is, but I'm over it."

As @Skills put it in that thread, there were too many chefs in the kitchen. You tried cobbling together a bunch of different strategies from different advice givers and turned it into a "patchwork get-her-back" strategy doomed to failure.

(This is analogous to the Patchwork Seducer effect.)

The more chances you blow, the more expert your follow-up needs to be to revivify your image in her eyes.

But the more chances you are blowing, the less of an expert you are going to tend to be, and the more you are just going to muck things up by continuing to follow up (sending wrong messages, getting the timing wrong, framing things wrong, hitting her with too many different things, etc.).

At this point with your girl, rather than a well-framed straightforward attempt (which would've worked immediately following the blow-up a few weeks back) you'd need some fairly complex game strategies demanding strong frame control instincts to get her gears spinning again and suck her back in. You would not be able to pull those off, given how previous attempts have gone, and giving them to you would just make things worse.

With a girl in the "all chances are used up" state, both no-contact and unskilled contact are ineffective.

It's a no-win situation -- like burning down a house then trying to figure out the best way to get the house back.

When it's still a small kitchen fire, you can put it out. Then put in some safeguards to avoid a repeat.

If the whole oven catches on fire, you can still put it out.

If the kitchen counter and appliance area catches on fire, it's getting dicy now and I hope you have a lot of fire extinguishers.

Once you reach the point where the entire kitchen is ablaze, unless you know how to call the firemen in or happen to have a fire hose and a hydrant laying around nearby and know how to use them, that house is burning down.

Your relationship in May was "whole oven is on fire." By a few weeks back it was "kitchen counter and appliance area are on fire." At this point the entire kitchen is in a conflagration.

While the relationship is in theory possible to save still, without the expert skills & instincts it is too far gone.

At this point, your best (most practical for your skill set) option is to go no-contact and hope she gets too depressed and lonely and reaches out on her own at some point.

I don't know what the odds are she reaches out again. Maybe 50/50?

Meanwhile, you should be focused on fully moving on:


It'll sting for a while, but you'll have important lessons from this relationship you can apply to the next one.

Time to get back in the saddle again.

Cheers,
Chase
 
the right date makes getting her back home a piece of cake

HeartOfChaos

Space Monkey
space monkey
Joined
Aug 3, 2025
Messages
125
At this point with your girl, rather than a well-framed straightforward attempt (which would've worked immediately following the blow-up a few weeks back) you'd need some fairly complex game strategies demanding strong frame control instincts to get her gears spinning again and suck her back in. You would not be able to pull those off, given how previous attempts have gone, and giving them to you would just make things worse

Yeah, I am not contacting her now. I agree that the major problem was confused handling.

Should I wish to re initiate sometime later down the line, say in a few months, do you think a straightforward attempt then to get her out in person would have a decent chance?

While the relationship is in theory possible to save still, without the expert skills & instincts it is too far gone.


What are these expert skills and how to develop them? Surely it depends on case by case situation and personality of each woman?



As @Skills put it in that thread, there were too many chefs in the kitchen. You tried cobbling together a bunch of different strategies from different advice givers and turned it into a "patchwork get-her-back" strategy doomed to failure.

Yeah. Last time I was in a LMR where the break up was initiated by a girl and hurt me badly was well over a decade ago. I had a couple of LMRs since then, but they mutually faded out. So I was completely unprepared for the situation, did not know how to react and coupled with my chronic lack of paying attention to signals, no surprise I screwed up.

At this point, your best (most practical for your skill set) option is to go no-contact and hope she gets too depressed and lonely and reaches out on her own at some point.

I don't know what the odds are she reaches out again. Maybe 50/50?

Would there have even been another option at this point except no-contact? Remember, a big part of why I tried to reach out to her a few days ago because of her LSE, depression and passivity. Granted, it fluctuates, she seems to be ok for now, but she's with family. As you yourself mentioned, her depression and LSE is a wildcard and may lead her to simply detach completely forever, especially as she tends to give up easily on things.

If it was a girl with a more healthy self esteem, I would not be overthinking this so much. A part of the "messy handling of situation" was that due to LSE, she compared herself to other girls I dated in the past and thought I behaved "better" with them and treated them more like a gf (which is completely untrue, but that's what she clearly said to me and believed).

It's hard to say how she feels long term and reacts. Overall she tends to be passive and retreat into her own space when sad / lonely. But maybe that will actually work in my favour and maybe will force her to reach out.
 
Last edited:

Chase

Chieftan
Staff member
tribal-elder
Joined
Oct 9, 2012
Messages
6,464
@HeartOfChaos,

Should I wish to re initiate sometime later down the line, say in a few months, do you think a straightforward attempt then to get her out in person would have a decent chance?

Depends how depressed and introverted she is.

If she sits in a dark room for 4 months and doesn't talk to anyone, maybe.

If she goes out and starts living her life and going on dates again, the chance is much lower.

At this point with the flurry of contact attempts, each time causing her to pull away more, the nail is pretty firmly in the coffin.

What are these expert skills and how to develop them? Surely it depends on case by case situation and personality of each woman?

The calibration to the girl and situation differs, but the expertise does not.

Basically:

  • Do you 'get' what she needs (REALLY needs)? Or are you confused by the various things she says she wants/needs? (i.e., able to focus on the forest over the trees vs. getting lost in the woods)

  • Do you understand how to convey that you can deliver what she needs without coming across like you are chasing (or, still worse, caving)?

  • Are you able to convey a dominant frame that your life is going a certain way, and that there is a place for her within it, and that the place she will occupy is exactly the one she wants and needs -- but then also that you have expectations of her as well (and to convey all this in a way that injects her with tons of hope without burdening her with a misread of her wants or anything it is unrealistic for her to be able to do)?

In essence, it is the ability to read what the woman wants, frame her wants as intersecting with what she can have with you, frame that as her still being of service to you, where her wants are simply being served incidentally by benefit of being with you, that way you are not chasing, you are not caving, you are just the powerful guy whose castle she wants to have a chamber in because all her hopes and dreams will be coming true in that chamber inside your castle.

Yeah. Last time I was in a LMR where the break up was initiated by a girl and hurt me badly was well over a decade ago. I had a couple of LMRs since then, but they mutually faded out. So I was completely unprepared for the situation, did not know how to react and coupled with my chronic lack of paying attention to signals, no surprise I screwed up.

Right.

Well, if you are insensitive to women's signals, and you want an ongoing relationship to last past a certain point, you will need to have some kind of mental checklist you run through every so often (and don't let yourself get lazy on) to compensate for that lower awareness.

I have an example of that in my "dating for autistic men" guide; even if you're not autistic, and just a little overly logical / inattentive, the same basic formula still stands.

(Then hopefully after a while it just becomes intuitive, and women doing anything that signals dissatisfaction trips your relationship alarm bells so you can fix it before it grows from molehill into mountain.)

Would there have even been another option at this point except no-contact? Remember, a big part of why I tried to reach out to her a few days ago because of her LSE, depression and passivity. Granted, it fluctuates, she seems to be ok for now, but she's with family. As you yourself mentioned, her depression and LSE is a wildcard and may lead her to simply detach completely forever, especially as she tends to give up easily on things.

If it was a girl with a more healthy self esteem, I would not be overthinking this so much. A part of the "messy handling of situation" was that due to LSE, she compared herself to other girls I dated in the past and thought I behaved "better" with them and treated them more like a gf (which is completely untrue, but that's what she clearly said to me and believed).

Hypothetically: yes, there are still multiple options to reach out to her, get her responsive, get her chasing, and get her back.

Practically: the combination of the bad precedent set by your previous (rejected) efforts to reach out, the geographical distance (no chance to reconcile physically while the emotions are hot from a reconciliation correspondence), and your own inexperience + lack of intuition (😢) around seducing back in women who have wandered off the reservation makes it next to impossible to actually pull off at this point. Either:

  1. You'll get the details of the reach-out attempt wrong, causing her to pull away even more, digging the hole even deeper, or

  2. You'll hit the right emotions, make her want to reconcile, but it's still weeks until you see each other; you can't get her out in-person and bang her brains out and have a deep heart-to-heart and fully re-seduce her; so instead she'll start second-guessing it as her emotions cool off again, remember her previous resolve, and likely decide that actually she does not want to get back

  3. Or even if you hit the right emotions, and she is so LSE that she remains hung up on you the whole time you're apart, you are likely to make a mistake at some point in that time, or at the reconciliation meeting, that is going to lead to her throwing her hands up in disgust and saying, "I can't believe I fell for it AGAIN!", driving the nail so deep in the coffin it breaks through the other side.

I can't see any recommendation anyone could give you at this point that you are likely to be able to execute effectively to get this girl back, aside from giving her time to cool off, hopefully start missing you, and circle back.

It's hard to say how she feels long term and reacts. Overall she tends to be passive and retreat into her own space when sad / lonely. But maybe that will actually work in my favour and maybe will force her to reach out.

I would say that is very likely your best bet with this girl, given the reality of the situation + your skills and abilities.

In the meantime, you should be rebounding as hard as you can and working to move on from her.

That way, if she does reappear, and you still want her (and who knows -- maybe you won't. Sometimes in the rebound phase you find really awesome girls really quick; "man on the rebound" is like a kind of "valuable commitment-worthy guy bargain bin" and a lot of girls seem to be able to smell it), you will be in a better place to execute that effectively.

Chase
 

HeartOfChaos

Space Monkey
space monkey
Joined
Aug 3, 2025
Messages
125
Thank you very much Chase for answering all my stupid questions. Clutching at straws, I know, but still...
Depends how depressed and introverted she is.

If she sits in a dark room for 4 months and doesn't talk to anyone, maybe.

If she goes out and starts living her life and going on dates again, the chance is much lower.

She isn't so depressed as to sit inside totally isolated for months - at least now, as her new pills seem to make her better. Her phone constantly receives messages from family and acquaintances or friends. She does go out, but just has frequent period of intense loneliness / self harm / low mood / inactivity especially in winter


Are you able to convey a dominant frame that your life is going a certain way, and that there is a place for her within it, and that the place she will occupy is exactly the one she wants and needs -- but then also that you have expectations of her as well
That's the difficulty, given that she knows my long term plans (work, location) are all up in the air, and they have been for years really. And she knows I expressed a desire to possibly relocate to a country in future where it's not very realistic for her to be, but for me might be ideal. But she also knows that I want to be with her and open to marriage etc, at least I said this much when she was break up.

You'll hit the right emotions, make her want to reconcile, but it's still weeks until you see each other; you can't get her out in-person and bang her brains out and have a deep heart-to-heart and fully re-seduce her

Oh, I don't mean to contact her right now. I really meant in a few weeks time at least. I am fully aware that now would be futile given geographical distance. But as I wrote before, my concern is that complete no contact for months will cause her to cool off and freeze totally, hence that's why waiting for too long is problematic.

That way, if she does reappear, and you still want her (and who knows -- maybe you won't. Sometimes in the rebound phase you find really awesome girls really quick; "man on the rebound" is like a kind of "valuable commitment-worthy guy bargain bin" and a lot of girls seem to be able to smell it), you will be in a better place to execute that effectively

Yeah... Given that I have approached around 50 women in last 2 weeks and got absolutely nothing, I don't see me finding awesome girls very likely, at least in London.

And there's more to it: when I got dumped by one LTR 12 years ago, I banged a dozen nice girls in the following few months...Still had the same longing for the ex. For me, it's really all about finding a girl on some deeper internal level who matches me emotionally. Realistically I am incompatible with 95% of women, I find. And given that I need to do hundreds of approaches to get a single lay, this makes the process like searching for a needle in a haystack.

Maybe it's the location issue. I think I will make a separate post about this.
 

HeartOfChaos

Space Monkey
space monkey
Joined
Aug 3, 2025
Messages
125
You'll get the details of the reach-out attempt wrong, causing her to pull away even more, digging the hole even deeper, or

P.S. One question here, what could "wrong details" of reach-out attempt entail, given the context that I ended the last conversation by saying that the ball is in her court?

Conveying neediness? Trying to chit chat too much rather than directly asking her to meet in person?
 
Last edited:
Top