This has been an extremely interesting discussion. Thanks @Karea Ricardus D. for bringing it up.
I have been working on my attachment style for a few years and I really think attachment theory is a great lens/framework to figuring out your relationships, both romantic and otherwise. And yes, you can have different attachments also depending on the relationship. I'm securely attached to my mom, while very avoidant with my dad for example. I'm disorganized with my romantic partners, with my anxious or avoidant side being shown more, depending on who I am with.
I think the passion trap concept and attachment styles work in tandem. The passion trap shows what's going on with you and a specific partner, but your attachment style modulates or amplifies which position you lean towards in the relationship:
Both types of avoidants basically have negative associations with vulnerability. They don't trust that the other person will have their best interests. The dismissive thus keeps himself closed off, being fully self-reliant and not needing to be vulnerable. The disorganized one, because of the anxious tendencies, feels the need to be vulnerable but at the same time doesn't trust the person he's being vulnerable with.
In the past years, I have worked on my attachment behaviours on a superficial level. Whenever my attachment would get triggered hard, especially on the anxious side, I would just force myself to not act on them. So, on the outside the girl would see me as a secure or avoidant. So, essentially it was like outer-game. But inside I'd still feel like a mess.
The way to look at it which has helped me more lately is trust. The secure person trusts himself to take care of himself, and also trusts the outside world to take care of his needs. The anxious trusts the world but not himself, so he clings to the world. The dismissive doesn't trust the world, but is self-reliant. The disorganized trusts no one.
So, the way to being more secure as a disorganized attacher is to develop trust on yourself and on the outside world. I have been practicing to be more vulnerable from the start of a relationship, and being accepting that it might still all go to shit, and I will still be ok.
Vulnerability has been a tricky concept to grasp for me, especially to be vulnerable and not be needy. My avoidant side has a tendency to consider all vulnerability to be neediness. Took me a while to understand that vulnerability from a point of strength is not neediness, and is good.
Hope this helps.
Cheers,
DarkJedi
I have been working on my attachment style for a few years and I really think attachment theory is a great lens/framework to figuring out your relationships, both romantic and otherwise. And yes, you can have different attachments also depending on the relationship. I'm securely attached to my mom, while very avoidant with my dad for example. I'm disorganized with my romantic partners, with my anxious or avoidant side being shown more, depending on who I am with.
I think the passion trap concept and attachment styles work in tandem. The passion trap shows what's going on with you and a specific partner, but your attachment style modulates or amplifies which position you lean towards in the relationship:
- Anxious: Very high chance of being pushed to the one-down side, because they always have a tendency to need the other person more. With securely attached people, they'd probably be starting off one-down, and with avoidants, they'd be heavily one-down. With another anxious person, it would probably depend on who's more leaning anxious
- Dismissive Avoidants: These are the ones who don't have attachment anxiety. High chance of being on the one-up throughout a relationship. When they perceive the tables turning, they'd rather exit the relationship than be one-down.
- Disorganized/Fearful Avoidants: Have both sides in them, and can sway very easily to being anxious (one-down) and avoidant (one-up), depending on how the partner is acting. And they can hit both extremes of avoidance or anxiety.
- Secure: They can sway both sides too, but the key difference is that they don't move to any direction too much before being able to self-correct and "fix" the situation. They have more emotional resilience to not get sucked into a grossly unfavourable dynamic for too long. They'll either try to fix it with healthy communication (instead of manipulation like the insecure styles) or exit the relationship.
Both types of avoidants basically have negative associations with vulnerability. They don't trust that the other person will have their best interests. The dismissive thus keeps himself closed off, being fully self-reliant and not needing to be vulnerable. The disorganized one, because of the anxious tendencies, feels the need to be vulnerable but at the same time doesn't trust the person he's being vulnerable with.
In the past years, I have worked on my attachment behaviours on a superficial level. Whenever my attachment would get triggered hard, especially on the anxious side, I would just force myself to not act on them. So, on the outside the girl would see me as a secure or avoidant. So, essentially it was like outer-game. But inside I'd still feel like a mess.
The way to look at it which has helped me more lately is trust. The secure person trusts himself to take care of himself, and also trusts the outside world to take care of his needs. The anxious trusts the world but not himself, so he clings to the world. The dismissive doesn't trust the world, but is self-reliant. The disorganized trusts no one.
So, the way to being more secure as a disorganized attacher is to develop trust on yourself and on the outside world. I have been practicing to be more vulnerable from the start of a relationship, and being accepting that it might still all go to shit, and I will still be ok.
Vulnerability has been a tricky concept to grasp for me, especially to be vulnerable and not be needy. My avoidant side has a tendency to consider all vulnerability to be neediness. Took me a while to understand that vulnerability from a point of strength is not neediness, and is good.
Hope this helps.
Cheers,
DarkJedi